GreyWolf
Elite Member
- Aug 17, 2009
- 1,862
- 5,847
You're probably better off most times using example 1, but you should actually do it like example 2 sometimes. Here is the part where I explained that in the first post.Which is the best way to post backlinks? For example, if i am ranking for this two keywords "online games" which of this two ways is better:
1. You can play free [FONT="]<a href="http://mysite.com">[/FONT]online games[FONT="]</a> at this site.
or
2.Free [/FONT][FONT="]<a href="http://mysite.com">[/FONT]online[FONT="]</a> games. The best flash [/FONT][FONT="]<a href="http://mysite.com">[/FONT]games[FONT="]</a> on the net.
[/FONT]
...
Change up your anchor text. The idea of backlinking is to simulate that masses of people are becoming interested in your site. It should have some amount of randomness to it in order to look natural. I've seen a few made up stats on what's best, but I think a good rule of thumb is maybe about 45% primary keywords, 35% secondary keywords, and about 15% random unrelated like Click Here, and then about 5% just the url. The exact percentage isn't dramatically important, it just needs to seem like the linking is natural.
...
The specific percentages aren't absolute. I've seen it recommended to use primary keywords more often than that, maybe even as much as 60% of the time, and drop the unrelated 'click here' to less than 1%. The point is you want to change it up and be sure to make anchors with both your primary keywords and secondary keywords.
One thing that's important to keep in mind when you're using the example 2. Google supposedly only indexes the anchor from the first backlink to your site that it finds on a page. If that's true then you'd be better off splitting your example 2 into using "online" for some sites and "games" for others, rather than placing them as seperate anchors on the same page.