RealBlackHat
Registered Member
- Feb 11, 2011
- 95
- 23
The point when these directories start getting too much spam is the day when AMR will stop being effective. When will that come? Only Google knows.
For that reason, I am AGAINST public sharing as everyone who uses AMR will hit those same article directories and they will soon be flooded with junk content.
On the other side, most of the users wouldn't have benefits from AMR if it didn't have that many directories, so then they wouldn't buy it. That's why AMR is made that way, to make it sellable, otherwise it wouldn't even exist at all. That's why I am OK with the directory sharing at the same time I am against it.
Final decision: Can't make up a decision![]()
Exactly, it's set up in a way to benefit the owner of AMR and not the hard working individuals who are trying harder than others to fulfill their SEO ambitions.
you work hard, and still use others links that they worked hard for
you benefit from others
others benefit from you
stop complaining and learn how to share![]()
I never WANTED other peoples hard earned links. I never knew it was set up like that.
I should be benefiting off the product and the product owner should be the one updating the links NOT the customers.... Or the product owner could have made it a Xrumer style program where he just sells the program and other people need to find their own links.
Right now it's set up to pamper to noobs and to get money in the door for the product. That's just my 2 cents!
If AMR wants to set it self apart from other article marketing programs it needs to be the best, and right now this "link sharing feature" is a HUGE dent in the credibility of this product.
Last edited: