Article Marketing Robot: Is this FAIR?

Is it fair of AMR to use my harvested websites?

  • Yes, sharing is caring.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, get your own links!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
I have a feature requests section on the AMR forum. Not all items get addressed, but some do. You can blacklist directories by highlighting one or more of them, right-click, blacklist options.

Sniper, why don't you post the forum url (if it is not against the TOS here) so some of these concerns can be brought in house.

Just a suggestion to keep things a little cleaner for you.
 
Links at the bottom of the AMR home page, or you can go help - instructions and there is a forum link in there as well.
 
Links at the bottom of the AMR home page, or you can go help - instructions and there is a forum link in there as well.

I was just trying to offer you some ideas... you and I have spoken and I know you are a solid guy offering a quality product.

I hope you didn't take my suggestion any other way.
 
I just thought I would offer a different way to access the forum instead of posting a direct link to it.. just in case ;)
 
Look, I'm a nice guy, but why should other people benefit off my harvested websites?

This is kind of making me want to use the cracked version instead!

"You can have everything you want in life, if you help enough other people get what they want" Zig Ziglar
 
I'm just learning to harvest new article sites,now I don't really have an issue with sharing but it seems AMR has horded all these directories to themselves.I'd rather see ,say,another 2-500 added every month to the main list because I have a 10% success rate right now mainly due to category mismatch issues,404 etc.
Anyway I know directories close etc so it would be a good way to keep it going.If anyone uses the private option they must submit 20working sites to general use.This way people keep their list and for those without scrapebox,still get decent runs out of it.
I like AMR and have seen success with it but I don't like the fact AMR must have a scary amount of directories.Maybe vince should do a decent clean up of the shitty ,non working directories and replace them with half decent,working ones.
 
it has advantage and disadvantage actually, everything should be got plus and minus, no matter what, right ?

advantage is, if u use robot, it can make a lot of link, better than person can do

disadvantage is, who want to read those non-sense article ? and it's difficult to re-edit those article, cause, too heavy to handle

however, people who want to use it, i think, because don't have enough (quantity) man power to do it

but it's different from big company who has power of money to get a team.

(personal opinion)
 
Ironic post talking about how other people are lazy when your using a tool that allows you to do less work which is "lazy"
 
I can't believe 60% votes for "Sharing is caring". This is Bullshit man. I have never tried to harvest any article directories but I've tried find blogs with scrapebox, let me tell you, it is definitely HARD WORK. Those ppl who are saying "sharing", you are Hypocrites and a bunch of lazy fuck.

This is definitely not fair for the guy and even though I'm benefit from his hard work, I still feel like the Owner is not doing his work right. I mean, I've never talk to the guy, but if he lets this happens, I don't care how nice he is with you, he is not a good guy.

Common, I mean, server cost, time, and even the knowledge to do all this. I respect people with skills and dedication. I bought Scrapebox for 3 months now and couldn't manage to scrape my own list of less than 1000 autoapprove blogs.

Apparently, I don't think the Owner would care about your problem because 60% of the voters are lazy fuck and they are willing to pay. %40 of the rest are also willing to pay for the software so ... why would he bother changing the system? After all, everyone gets the benefits from this but only the Owner get the best out of it. It's life man. The world we're living in is FUCKED.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe 60% votes for "Sharing is caring". This is Bullshit man. I have never tried to harvest any article directories but I've tried find blogs with scrapebox, let me tell you, it is definitely HARD WORK. Those ppl who are saying "sharing", you are Hypocrites and a bunch of lazy fuck.

This is definitely not fair for the guy and even though I'm benefit from his hard work, I still feel like the Owner is not doing his work right. I mean, I've never talk to the guy, but if he lets this happens, I don't care how nice he is with you, he is not a good guy.

Common, I mean, server cost, time, and even the knowledge to do all this. I respect people with skills and dedication. I bought Scrapebox for 3 months now and couldn't manage to scrape my own list of less than 1000 autoapprove blogs.

Apparently, I don't think the Owner would care about your problem because 60% of the voters are lazy fuck and they are willing to pay. %40 of the rest are also willing to pay for the software so ... why would he bother changing the system? After all, everyone gets the benefits from this but only the Owner get the best out of it. It's life man. The world we're living in is FUCKED.
actually if you are the owner of AMR, you would definitely put the same policy...if everyone just use the database for his own, most of the noobs would feel "AMR is useless" considering how small the number of its directories. they will go away once they find out a better tool than AMR. Obviously AMR creator has been thinking about this. It's all about money man...
 
hopefully this software will not become deprecated, maybe a monthly fee will keep it from mass using.

I answered YES to the poll.
 
a simple way would be to give the user an option when he adds sites... option to either make his additions public or not... dats all... those who want to share let them share, those who dont want to share let them not share..
 
I have to say I agree with RealBlackHat. The fact that it is a paid service, & the work is his own - should entitle him to some exclusivity. For new users, of course it is a good thing to get access to all the links accumulated by the rest of the members. But saying that, it also is not entirely fair on those who do not want to just give-away their hard-earned work, especially when someone else is making money off of that...
 
I feel the same way and will implement the private feature in the next build. As it stands right now, I am in the middle of adding some other features and I don't want to rush anything out the door that will just cause more chaos.

Please have some patience on this one as I can't put a lot of time into coding right now due to my personal circumstances, but hope to have something out within the next few weeks.

Thanks for listening Sniper - great customer service.
 
i want to sale my twiends account some accounts have 25,000 points and some of have 50,000 points in them. if some one wants to buy these account so please tell me.

i am asking
$ 35 for 25,000 points account
$ 80 for 50,000 points account

if someone interested so please let me know.
and tell how how will you pay me
 
dude you're not the only one with scrapebox and harversting new blogs all the time, other people will find something you missed and you'll take advantage of that too. why so selfish?
 
I totally agree with the OP on not sharing. There are plenty of "gimmes" in this forum and available to those who would rather not do the harvesting.

I have not learned how to harvest directories yet, as I just got scrapebox. My next purchase is set to be AMR, but this would be one of those things that would have kept me on the fence had Sniper not addressed it.

Sniper, thank you for addressing this issue. Might I suggest that it be done in such a way that the default setting allows any added directories to be put into the mass directory list, but that if you want to privatize your own, you have to set that option up. That way, those who want to benefit from others work can still do so, but those of US who choose to keep their hard work to themselves can do so as well.
 
I just basically found out that AMR uses the sites that you import through their program into a "global database" that is shared with all the other AMR users.

Look, I'm a nice guy, but why should other people benefit off my harvested websites?

This is kind of making me want to use the cracked version instead!


I have a proposition that makes sence.... dont import your hard-way-found article directories (yet) and use those which are there already...

Now after you have made your money back with them, import your article directories as o contribution, as you have used other peoples findings and profited from them :) makes sence to me(?)

ARM is beautiful piece of software, i have done 2 articles and submitted them.... now my site is #2 in google after few days, and i have not yet pinged my articles!
 
Well I am still waiting for the next update with the private feature implemented...
 
Back
Top