Anyone Using AI to Mass Generate Pages? How Are You Indexing Them?

Hey,

I’ve seen a lot of talk about using AI to generate thousands of pages for SEO — especially for local or niche-specific targeting. Curious to know if anyone here is actually pulling decent results from this in 2025?

My biggest question is: how are you getting them indexed?

• Are you using tiered linking?
• Social signals?
• GSC and sitemap spam?
• Or just waiting it out?

Also, does Google seem to catch on faster now with AI content, or are you still flying under the radar with the right setups?

Would love to hear what’s working (or what’s completely failing) from anyone testing this at scale.

Interlink using link whisper plugin it's openai api integrated. Submit the sitemap to gsc google will indexed a well interlinked site.

Muzzaffar said:

Hey,

I’ve seen a lot of talk about using AI to generate thousands of pages for SEO — especially for local or niche-specific targeting. Curious to know if anyone here is actually pulling decent results from this in 2025?

My biggest question is: how are you getting them indexed?

• Are you using tiered linking?
• Social signals?
• GSC and sitemap spam?
• Or just waiting it out?

Also, does Google seem to catch on faster now with AI content, or are you still flying under the radar with the right setups?

Would love to hear what’s working (or what’s completely failing) from anyone testing this at scale.

Click to expand...

For these sorts of sites I mainly go for aged/expired domains, and backlink the home page, category pages, and author pages (if I include them). I use related posts at the end of the post (calculated using a simple FULLTEXT mysql search as a relevance factor), and a random number of internal links added to the post content. To add these I simply select a 'root word' at random from the text, then take the words to the left and right of that word, and use that 3 word phrase as the link. (this is the simplified method, I have another convoluted method to preserve structure with punctuation and vary link length etc)

If possible, I prefer to add the AI posts as a separate section of an already existing site, ie. a new 'FAQ' section. These seem to stick better. That said, I am finding indexing of these sorts of sites to be slowing down though this year so far.

Muzzaffar said:

Hey,

I’ve seen a lot of talk about using AI to generate thousands of pages for SEO — especially for local or niche-specific targeting. Curious to know if anyone here is actually pulling decent results from this in 2025?

My biggest question is: how are you getting them indexed?

• Are you using tiered linking?
• Social signals?
• GSC and sitemap spam?
• Or just waiting it out?

Also, does Google seem to catch on faster now with AI content, or are you still flying under the radar with the right setups?

Would love to hear what’s working (or what’s completely failing) from anyone testing this at scale.

Click to expand...

Yes, mass-generating AI content still works in 2025 — but indexing is the bottleneck. Smart internal linking, fresh XML sitemaps submitted to GSC, and injecting social signals (like Twitter/X and Reddit embeds) help. Some use cloud-based Tier 1 links or embed pages in Web 2.0s. Google’s getting sharper at detecting low-value AI content, so adding structured data, unique media, and tweaking templates per niche helps fly under the radar. Quality > quantity is the new safe play at scale.

for AI generated content (unedited), my recent problem is not getting indexed, but keeping them indexed.

I’ve been testing AI content on expired domains too, and adding internal links with random anchor phrases helps a bit. Submitting sitemaps to GSC works, but indexing still feels slower this year. Anyone else seeing this?

Great question, this has definitely been getting more traction lately. I’ve tested mass AI page generation for local SEO in low-comp niches, and indexing has been hit or miss. What’s worked best for me so far is a mix of GSC sitemaps + some light tiered linking (mostly web 2.0s and niche-relevant forums), plus sprinkling in social signals to simulate real activity. I’ve noticed Google’s a bit more picky in 2025, especially with thin or templated content, but if your internal linking and on-page looks natural, a decent chunk still gets indexed. But yeah, at scale, some pages just won’t stick