AdworkMedia pending payment

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m looking from the outside in. So, I can only speculate. But if I were to guess, what happened here is just mismanagement. They probably had a backlog of communication with their publishers as well.

They still should contact him, but this kind of thing happens.
I didn't mean to suggest that it's a scam, just that I get why it can feel like one. Every business is operated by people, and people make mistakes.
 
Yea, mismanagement sounds about right. From the sound of the person who works for the company above, the investigation requires a response back from the advertiser to go any further after the initial report.

Wonder if advertisers are taking advantage of that.

Sometimes things get lost in a transitional phase. I’m not saying they’re right, they’re not. They should’ve handled it better and this should be made right.

However, it’s not the first time a thread like this has been posted here


I didn't mean to suggest that it's a scam, just that I get why it can feel like one. Every business is operated by people, and people make mistakes.

Oh no, I didn’t mean you. There was a member who commented a few above yours who alluded to the CPA network being a scam because of the investigation.

As I’ve said on the forum before, we’re not machines. We’re subject to entropy, decay, and mistakes. Oh, and fucking taxes, of course.
 
As I’ve said on the forum before, we’re not machines. We’re subject to entropy, decay, and mistakes. Oh, and fucking taxes, of course.
Speak for yourself. I’ve been evading paying taxes for years. What are they gonna do, arrest me?

Also I don’t think they scamming in any way. I used them what feels like a decade ago and they were solid.
 
That's true, but they also should have notified OP that the adv marked his traffic as fraud in real time and not just when the payment is due. It sheds bad light on the investigation, especially when it's taking so long.
We dont even know how much the payment is and what if the publisher is sending fraud traffic ?

He should be ashamed of himself for ruining the advertiser relationship with the network
 
what if the publisher is sending fraud traffic ?
That's why they are investigating.
Never jump to conclusions, even after the investigation ends, the advertiser has good reasons to claim that this is fraud even if it isn't, and they're the ones holding the money.
 
Speak for yourself. I’ve been evading paying taxes for years. What are they gonna do, arrest me?

Also I don’t think they scamming in any way. I used them what feels like a decade ago and they were solid.

Yes, that’s exactly what they’ll do. You may be lucky and they’ll offer you a payment plan, but I’ve heard that if you miss one payment the balance becomes full.

There was another use above who mentioned the word scam. So, that’s what I was referring to.

Also, in my humble IM opinion, taxation is theft.


why why why why why did you mention taxes?!
this topic is the only topic worse than covid.



It can be. You just have to figure out the loopholes. In internet marketing, you can claim a fair amount to get reductions.
 
Have you contacted their support team?
I have reached out to that user via PM to try and find out why their payment was cancelled.
That process takes a whole year?
It shouldn’t normally but it’s not just a single exchange between us and the advertiser. It’s not like we reach out to them on why they’ve flagged a pub and they say “yeah it’s our wish” and then we tell the pub “tough luck”. There’s a lot of back and forth. Our team liaising with their’s figuring out if there’s enough proof to back up the advertiser’s claims. It’s usually in these instances where we ask the pub for proof of their traffic and campaigns but some of them clamp right up citing reasons of “method leak” and what not. I’m not sure how the other networks work but I honestly couldn’t care about a CPA method that I’ve probably used myself in the past. It goes this far only when the leads are iffy and/or are not converting for the advertiser. So if you’ve got good leads, the payment should be on time.

The leads get counted on the network when our in house anti-fraud has cleared it. But that’s just one part of the equation. It needs to convert for the advertiser (they do have metrics for that and they do keep a close eye on it as like any of us, they don’t want to lose money either). If whatever system they’ve got in place clears it as well, the payment gets sent out. If not, the date gets postponed. But it shows as “Payment due on XX” on our system and a lot of pubs take that for a certainty when it’s not. It’s a definite date when it’s a pub we’ve worked with for years and trust but for some accounts, it’s just a date.

The truth is we’ve got plenty of users who try to game the system. I’ve been a part of this forum for quite a while now and it’s funny watching them think that they’ve fooled our system. There was a time about a year back when threads like this started popping up left and right. I cleared all those payments because they were members of BHW even though their traffic looked sketchy. I was then made to know that there was a facebook group based in a T3 country that listed this out as an actual method. Meaning they encouraged their members to commit CPA fraud and then post a thread on BHW because some clueless AM (me) was green lighting all the payments. I’ve since stopped blindly approving payment requests and have begun looking into the traffic. If it’s genuine, we’ll pay you as that’s the only way a network works.
 
I have reached out to that user via PM to try and find out why their payment was cancelled.

It shouldn’t normally but it’s not just a single exchange between us and the advertiser. It’s not like we reach out to them on why they’ve flagged a pub and they say “yeah it’s our wish” and then we tell the pub “tough luck”. There’s a lot of back and forth. Our team liaising with their’s figuring out if there’s enough proof to back up the advertiser’s claims. It’s usually in these instances where we ask the pub for proof of their traffic and campaigns but some of them clamp right up citing reasons of “method leak” and what not. I’m not sure how the other networks work but I honestly couldn’t care about a CPA method that I’ve probably used myself in the past. It goes this far only when the leads are iffy and/or are not converting for the advertiser. So if you’ve got good leads, the payment should be on time.

The leads get counted on the network when our in house anti-fraud has cleared it. But that’s just one part of the equation. It needs to convert for the advertiser (they do have metrics for that and they do keep a close eye on it as like any of us, they don’t want to lose money either). If whatever system they’ve got in place clears it as well, the payment gets sent out. If not, the date gets postponed. But it shows as “Payment due on XX” on our system and a lot of pubs take that for a certainty when it’s not. It’s a definite date when it’s a pub we’ve worked with for years and trust but for some accounts, it’s just a date.

The truth is we’ve got plenty of users who try to game the system. I’ve been a part of this forum for quite a while now and it’s funny watching them think that they’ve fooled our system. There was a time about a year back when threads like this started popping up left and right. I cleared all those payments because they were members of BHW even though their traffic looked sketchy. I was then made to know that there was a facebook group based in a T3 country that listed this out as an actual method. Meaning they encouraged their members to commit CPA fraud and then post a thread on BHW because some clueless AM (me) was green lighting all the payments. I’ve since stopped blindly approving payment requests and have begun looking into the traffic. If it’s genuine, we’ll pay you as that’s the only way a network works.

I never heard that story, man. It sucks that those losers took advantage of your good nature. Helping people is infectious. It's addicting and gives you a nice sense of being the change you want to see. But people like that can really ruin it.
 
I have reached out to that user via PM to try and find out why their payment was cancelled.

It shouldn’t normally but it’s not just a single exchange between us and the advertiser. It’s not like we reach out to them on why they’ve flagged a pub and they say “yeah it’s our wish” and then we tell the pub “tough luck”. There’s a lot of back and forth. Our team liaising with their’s figuring out if there’s enough proof to back up the advertiser’s claims. It’s usually in these instances where we ask the pub for proof of their traffic and campaigns but some of them clamp right up citing reasons of “method leak” and what not. I’m not sure how the other networks work but I honestly couldn’t care about a CPA method that I’ve probably used myself in the past. It goes this far only when the leads are iffy and/or are not converting for the advertiser. So if you’ve got good leads, the payment should be on time.

The leads get counted on the network when our in house anti-fraud has cleared it. But that’s just one part of the equation. It needs to convert for the advertiser (they do have metrics for that and they do keep a close eye on it as like any of us, they don’t want to lose money either). If whatever system they’ve got in place clears it as well, the payment gets sent out. If not, the date gets postponed. But it shows as “Payment due on XX” on our system and a lot of pubs take that for a certainty when it’s not. It’s a definite date when it’s a pub we’ve worked with for years and trust but for some accounts, it’s just a date.

The truth is we’ve got plenty of users who try to game the system. I’ve been a part of this forum for quite a while now and it’s funny watching them think that they’ve fooled our system. There was a time about a year back when threads like this started popping up left and right. I cleared all those payments because they were members of BHW even though their traffic looked sketchy. I was then made to know that there was a facebook group based in a T3 country that listed this out as an actual method. Meaning they encouraged their members to commit CPA fraud and then post a thread on BHW because some clueless AM (me) was green lighting all the payments. I’ve since stopped blindly approving payment requests and have begun looking into the traffic. If it’s genuine, we’ll pay you as that’s the only way a network works.
So what proofs does the network really ask for mate?

ad network screenshots? tracking software screenshots?
 
Popcash + competing the offers yourself? :anyway:
How is it possible for me to complete german and french offers that requires completion with credit card details when I am not in any of these countries?
 
stolen credit cards mate
I do not have such idea. And I do not have access to any of these countries.
I only make use of popcash as approved by the affiliate network.
I got the first payment successfully, then the second payment pending over a year now.
 
I do not have such idea. And I do not have access to any of these countries.
I only make use of popcash as approved by the affiliate network.
I got the first payment successfully, then the second payment pending over a year now.
why you waited such long for payment and how much is the amount ?
 
I've used adworkmedia few years back without problems and now I'm back in lead generation and working with companies like maxbounty, Toroadvertising, but I feel that adworkmedia is not interested in my traffic. The support doesn't answer, it's impossible to reach out to my affiliate manager and the offers are not beeing accepted.

Adworkmedia has changed drastically over the years.
 
I do not have such idea. And I do not have access to any of these countries.
I only make use of popcash as approved by the affiliate network.
I got the first payment successfully, then the second payment pending over a year now.
Second payment is pending over a year? If the amount is not big, just forget about it and move on.
 
Contact their support.

This is not a BHW issue and the representative for that entity has always been on point and never a SL problem.

/Thread
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top