would WHO IS privacy have protected this from happening?
would putting all your clients on a offshore hosting account have prevented this problem without them even noticing they were on a offshore server?
Just thinking about future protections for your business model as a uniform practice.
Take the image down and ignore the letter.
If they search google for images, use the search tools button and select usage rights, then select labeled for reuse or labeled for reuse with modification.
This takes the hard work out of finding noncopywrite images...but the selection is pretty bare.
There are plenty of sites that offer free stock images, not the best but gets the job done without any trouble.
I'm not talking about forums that gather content from usersEven with the free sites you're not completely safe. For example, if the person who uploaded the image to the site didn't own the copyright in the first place.
I'm not talking about forums that gather content from users
If blackhatters do whitehat business...
Read through this here: http://www.contentfac.com/copyright-infringement-penalties-are-scary/
Hey Honest, I tried to PM you but I think I need more posts on here. Thanks for suggesting the offshore host though. My year of hosting is almost up and I'll start to consider moving my sites.If you can send a copy of the letter to me I'll have a few people take a look at it, myself included. In the future you (or your customers) use an offshore host; if I am not mistaken, this would prevent any possible issues.
I've dealt with all kinds of these letters in the past, never have I complied or been brought up on charges.