6 strikes rule takes effect July 1st?

Hmmmm, interesting, I been torrenting for years and about a week ago, i received a call from some peeps with an over seas accent and they said they were recieving some "red alert signals" from my computer. Im a PC tech and I admit that I have been loose with my PC security but they said they were with my ISP. I was trying to explain to them that I could care less about any signals that they could be receiving, hell just ignore them. Then the dude randomly said he could get my Windows License deactivated for pirating games.... I hung the phone up, recracked my Windows 7, did a full virus scan and kept on being a boss. I did notice that my internet seems to be going faster xD (and i know its not from removing a virus, im talking about 500KB/s to 1MB/s.). IDK, Centurylink sucks ass either way....


Thats just a scam. They often pretend that they are from microsoft and they are going to help with virus/trojan/whatever problem on you windows pc. They want to give remote desktop help and install virus/trojan/malware software. Even might hijack your pc/files for $$$. Avoid them.
 
Get an offshore windows vps and torrent all of your files with that. You can get one relatively cheap depending where you get it. Whenever the torrents are done downloading, download it directly from the vps. If you do that, you'll have super fast torrent downloads, and you won't have to worry about these copyright assholes getting your real ip. Plus you'll be doing a good deed for other pirates that want fast downloads of the files you have. Ive been doing this for a couple years now.
 
I agree with 2011nfl , I doubt ISP's will ban users for file sharing . They would loss a lot of money from user's cause everyone's doing it. I don't think banning half of their user's is good for business . I think this whole thing is just hype .

I think it's just scare tactics mostly. These corporations know that they'll never be able to put a complete end to piracy. The thing is, the average internet user doesn't have clue about how to hide their tracks on the internet (proxies, vpns, etc). So they'll be more prone to actually buy movies, software, streaming services, etc instead of pirating in fear that the law will come down on them. In turn, these corporations see a huge increase in profits which is what they're after.
 
There is no "free" internet and never has been, you are agreeing to the terms of the ISP when you order it. Its their lines, and their servers not the public's.

"The Public" regulates & controls every single aspect of the ISP, from the license to do business, the certificate of occupancy, the income taxes, sales taxes, special fees, the imminent domain of the utility poles and underground cable, the RF radiating from the electronics, allowing large trucks to park illegally and sometimes block roadways for repairs & installs, requiring public service announcements, requiring contracts that the ISPs get their customers to sign guarantee that the customer receive fair value, the geographical areas where some ISP's have monopolies due to only one ISP being allowed access, the special funding given to ISPs in order to provide service to remote and unprofitable areas, not to mention the whole slew of special regulations that require ISPs to provide an inordinate number of sports channels and deny individual customers the ability to choose basic packages without any sports in them at all (ESPN in particular).

And also the satellites, the use of them, the regulated radio frequencies the satellites used, the licensed technology being given (instead of sold) to them, and the US subsidized mail service they use to deliver their billing.

So, if the ISPs want to get arrogant and anger the General Public, we can renegotiate everything. We can run Time Warner out of business, and construct circumstances favorable enough so that evenyour Aunt Sadie can make a profit running an ISP. We can decide anything we want, put them out of business, put someone else in business, get better service for a cheaper price and never remember they even existed 12 months later. What was the name of that cable company again? Cox-something-or-other? The one that went out of business last year. Yea, THAT one. I hated those a-holes. I'm GLAD they went out of business, and now we have Sadie's Home Entertainment as our ISP.
 
you got it all wrong. they do not have triggers on those keywords like some kind of Google Alerts. They just keep all the logs and if you're ever arrested for anything they go and look at them. Then they can use that against you.

lol what if someone being a programmer launches a virus for any particular individual and that virus is only to send messages "am selling cocaine"....will he be screwed? if yes? I think I have to learn now how to code virus to kick ass my SEO competitors :D
 
This is the entire reason I don't use P2P networks. I really think 1/2 of them are a complete sting set up by certain corporations. You download from them and boom... They got you. There's better ways of getting things without torrents and as of yet I haven't had any emails about anything I've downloaded from those. But when I've used torrents... Ugh. I got emails that told me what I had downloaded and when. Sharing sites are way better than p2p...
 
Good thing there's now literally more IP addresses than there are stars in the sky...

Get ready for the Proxy Wars 2024.
 
Good thing there's now literally more IP addresses than there are stars in the sky...

Get ready for the Proxy Wars 2024.

Yes , so VPN's will become cheaper too i think. This is crazy if it does happen....
 
Charter internet has been doing this for a couple years. My big brother and a friend of mine both received letters from Charter stating the exact material that they downloaded. My brother's was Dr. Dre and my buddies was a Slayer album.
 
I don't live in the US so I won't be having this problem anytime soon...

But there is a very simple solution for you guys as well, just use secure connections (encrypted) when you're downloading stuff and you have nothing to worry about. Encrypted traffic looks the same, there is no way for the ISP to see what is "inside" the secure connection, a byte is a byte is a byte.
 
1st VPN from Russia = done..
2nd VPN from China = done..
1st Socks 5 from Phanama = done..
2nd Socks 5 from Netherland = done..
Anonymous Proxy from a botnet PC = done..
Cracking neighbours WLAN = done..

This should keep you 99,999% save - but you still have to use your brain, and do not login on your personal Paypal etc.
 
@albaniax proxy chaining ftw. i never bother though. would slow my 100mbps down :)
 
The possible benefit to the ISP would be reduced bandwidth maybe?

ISPs and carriers are usually not the same. In other words the company you get internet from is not always a carrier (doesn't have a backbone). That being said, the room for bandwidth growth of the carriers is huge. They can handle hundreds of times more bandwidth on the current fiber infrastructure. The reason they don't increase customer bandwidth has to do with price policy and equipment at the ends of the backbones and at the ISP. But do not make the mistake to think the infrastructure is limited. A single fiber thread is capable of transfer rates at the speed of light (theoretically). In practice the electronic devices where the fiber line is connected is what slows things down and that is why the price of a backbone fiber router costs more than a sports car. Those things have to be fast. Now think that all carriers have hundreds of fiber threads in a single cable.

You don't believe me? The fastest sustained speed P2P achieved was IIRC 186gbps (23gBps). That means you'd transfer an entire 1TB hard disk in 43 seconds. Actually in practice you wouldn't because the speed of a HDD is lower than 186gbps in general.
 
Ah man. I just read that at torrentfreak too. Us really sucks this days, they want to squeeze every single drop of money from their citizens lol.
 
Back
Top