Cassius Ali
Registered Member
- Aug 14, 2009
- 92
- 18
1500 words is a good start. Make sure your article gives you room to expand if need be.
Why limit yourself? Write as much as you can and as long article as you can with tons of longtails everywhere. Some of my articles are 15K words and they rank and convert perfectly.
Because people have literally 4 second attention span and can't be bothered to read 15k words.
I recently wrote a 10k article and had to spend a long time making it as pieced out as possible.
Exactly. And during those 4 seconds you want them to click the affiliate link, gtfo and do the landing page make the conversion.
Unless you're purely filling up content for keyword usage.
See? It wasn't that hard.
And no, with a nicely made navigation you are not undermining anything.
Google's UX evaluation is algorithm-based, not manual reviews, so well-written content-heavy pages tend to get a bonus.Google cares about user experience. The mentality "the longer the better" isn't always the best strategy.
Google's UX evaluation is algorithm-based, not manual reviews, so well-written content-heavy pages tend to get a bonus.
I agree that virtually nobody reads these overly-long articles, but a 1% conversion rate while on page 1 of the SERPS is always going to be more profitable than a 10% conversion rate while stuck on page 3.
Have you done split-testing between multiple sites to verify this?Except if people see long-winded redundant 15000 word articles they will bounce da fuck out of there, and then googles algo goes to work to drop your ranking.
Have you done split-testing between multiple sites to verify this?
I'm not questioning the bounce rate aspect of the algorithm, I'm just curious if you've tested long vs short articles to compare real-world bounce rates.It is common knowledge that user actions influence search results (i.e. bounce rate, etc).
Except if people see long-winded redundant 15000 word articles they will bounce da fuck out of there, and then googles algo goes to work to drop your ranking.
Your user experience depends on how you structure the article. The length does not matter.
Length is just a bot fodder. Everything important is in the first few paragraphs, including clickthrough links.
Well, you base this argument on what you think, while I base it on what has been working for me for years.
My longest article is ranking top 3 for 4400 Amazon keywords (and gazillion of longtails I do not even know about) without a single backlink built (site overall has also no links built). And Amazon traffic from that article converts well about 10%.
So if you know what you are doing, yes, longer is always better.
Just curious, what broad experience do you have on the subject? What split-testing have you done, across how many sites, how many niches, how recent, etc?You are basing this off your narrow-experience of your Amazon sites and passing it off as a general rule. And this is simply not the case.
Just curious, what broad experience do you have on the subject? What split-testing have you done, across how many sites, how many niches, how recent, etc?
There are lots of things about my own sites that I seriously dislike (my personal pet peeve is pagination and slideshows rather than single-page articles), but the raw data from split-testing proves that these annoying tactics greatly improve the bounce rate and SERP positions, without overly sacrificing the conversion rate. And if your site is well-designed, your article length won't even be immediately apparent to your visitors.
And if your site is well-designed, your article length won't even be immediately apparent to your visitors.
So you're speaking from opinions, not data? Got it.You seem pretty hell bent on me providing data for common sense and don't seem to question what the other guy says.
I think you're getting me confused with someone else, I've never done affiliate links.They still have to read the article. You do know that not every website is an affiliate site with the goal of stuffing links for immediate clicks to Amazon right?
If your visitors are bouncing out after four seconds, perhaps you should have someone look over your site for UX/content issues.The average attention span is 4 seconds online (something like that)... and you cannot possibly fathom how some people prefer to read shorter articles?