#1 With No Hands SEO Alone

g4m3r said:

How you reach #1?

look at my stats with/without (some hand made bl's) no hands seo

View attachment 11076

Click to expand...

You're comparing stats from before a google update and after a google update, it doesn't really say much if anything about the effectiveness of NHSEO as the latest google update changed things for the majority of webmasters (or so it appears). There are discussions all over the internet, including this forum, talking about how their ranks have shot down since the latest update.

Whenever you build links it is very very common to see the rankings jump up and down for a few days to a couple of weeks while the search engine decides where your website should sit in the rankings. There are also an endless amount of factors that could cause a drop in rankings and to be honest 50 or so visitors is hardly a big sample size to draw any major conclusions from.

Hello.

I've download trial version two hours ago, and searching for google opinions, have found in the official webmasters google spanish blog:

http://googlewebmaster-es.blogspot.com.es/2012/04/un-paso-mas-en-el-reconocimiento-de.html

NHSEO as Matt Cutts' black hat example. See pic:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NshS6eSDRuE/T5a5s3SqUvI/AAAAAAAAAEs/4qk0qauWRQo/s1600/keyword-stuffing.png

and says NHSEO's site is going to pinguin affected.

In english, your can read it at:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-step-to-reward-high-quality.html



Any way, NHSEO looks as an ideal tool.

Thanks, jimbobo2779.

This tool gives me only no follow links, and they are completely useless for ranking, no follow will not pass page rank or anchor text, or anything.. except maybe that my link portfolio will look more natural in roboeyes of boogle?

anyone confirm, is it work with a lot of change of google panda?

The majority of links on the internet are d0-foll0w. I am doubtful therefore that there would be any penalty for having all or mostly DF links. Since the minority of links on the net are N0-follow on the other hand, if you are blasting away with NHSEO/SB/whatever that makes 97% or whatever NF links, now THAT is a massive red flag. So it's ironic that the owner of NHSEO should tell people to blast with NHSEO because it makes a more "natural" distribution of links, when it is anything but. I like to blast as much as anybody but these assumptions of penalties for having DF links are far-fetched and hypocritical, in this case.

loulou said:

This tool gives me only no follow links, and they are completely useless for ranking, no follow will not pass page rank or anchor text, or anything.. except maybe that my link portfolio will look more natural in roboeyes of boogle?

Click to expand...

Ewayinc said:

anyone confirm, is it work with a lot of change of google panda?

Click to expand...

jb2008 said:

The majority of links on the internet are d0-foll0w. I am doubtful therefore that there would be any penalty for having all or mostly DF links. Since the minority of links on the net are N0-follow on the other hand, if you are blasting away with NHSEO/SB/whatever that makes 97% or whatever NF links, now THAT is a massive red flag. So it's ironic that the owner of NHSEO should tell people to blast with NHSEO because it makes a more "natural" distribution of links, when it is anything but. I like to blast as much as anybody but these assumptions of penalties for having DF links are far-fetched and hypocritical, in this case.

Click to expand...

If the penguin update did in anyway penalise for using NHSEO why is NHSEO still in the rankings? Why aren't any of my websites affected? I can easily tell you why and it is because of the content on the sites that are getting penalised, it is that simple.

Since starting work on NHSEO I have only had a few SENuke blasts to a couple of my sites, everything else has been all NHSEO and guess what... I haven't had a single noticeable drop in traffic on any of my sites. In fact check them out yourself:


Also the site is still very much a PR2. Totally unaffected by the new update, well actually it is slightly up since the last update on what I would have expected.

If this new update attacked people that have used NHSEO at all the sites worst hit would be mine so why have I yet to see a site take even a small drop? It is all because of content and the way the site is SEOd, ok I am guessing as much as the next person but when people are blaming NHSEO I can unequivocally state that they are wrong.

malaga said:

Hello.

I've download trial version two hours ago, and searching for google opinions, have found in the official webmasters google spanish blog:

http://googlewebmaster-es.blogspot.com.es/2012/04/un-paso-mas-en-el-reconocimiento-de.html

NHSEO as Matt Cutts' black hat example. See pic:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NshS6eSDRuE/T5a5s3SqUvI/AAAAAAAAAEs/4qk0qauWRQo/s1600/keyword-stuffing.png

and says NHSEO's site is going to pinguin affected.

In english, your can read it at:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-step-to-reward-high-quality.html



Any way, NHSEO looks as an ideal tool.

Thanks, jimbobo2779.

Click to expand...

I have stated over and over about the picture that Matt Cutts and how it shows an example of KEYWORD STUFFING, a tactic that he talked about at length in the blog post. He does not once or even suggest anything like that they will be targeting NHSEO or that it will no longer work what he says is that they are tackling webspam which he describes as keyword stuffing and spinning text to create content on a website. This is nothing at all what NHSEO does.

I don't want to soung like I am having a go at you but I have seen it posted a hundred times as proof that NHSEO is a sure fire way to get your website banned, if that was the case why haven't I seen even a slight drop? Could it be that the content on my websites is what Google is looking for in the latest update? As Matt Cutts has said the update is primarily about content and I have used NHSEO extensively on the majority of my websites I would be inclined to say so.

See the pic of my webstats for nohandsseo.com, that is with almost 90% nofollow links.

loulou said:

This tool gives me only no follow links, and they are completely useless for ranking

Click to expand...

insert: Not sure if serious image...

/cutwrist
/leavesforum

Be very smart when you use this tool because the links that it create are not the best for google ^^

jimbobo,

If big G bans your site, only must be because your tool es THE BEST, and they (neither your competitors) can't permit it.

Like.

I think Jimbob cannot say his sites are still ranking etc. Better to come from someone who is unbiast.

Ill vouch for it. Currently got 9 sites all running with it and only seen drop with one of them (have been running scrapebox blasts on it)
Some of the links you are getting are pr7+ with low OBL.

malaga said:

jimbobo,

If big G bans your site, only must be because your tool es THE BEST, and they (neither your competitors) can't permit it.

Like.

Click to expand...

mailingmax said:

I think Jimbob cannot say his sites are still ranking etc. Better to come from someone who is unbiast.

Click to expand...

Wanna see another screeny of website stats?
Website stats

That is a pic of my stats from all domains on that account, some are years old, some are brand new and almost all have had some attention from NHSEO, can you not see the upward trend. I am not claiming NHSEO is a sure fire way to get #1 over night, I have never claimed anything rediculous like that.

You can say I am biased all you like but I don't see anyone discrediting me. I have always been totally honest and patient with people but this topic is getting really friggin old now. This update did not target NHSEO, if the two screenys of stats don't satisfy you what would? Maybe another shot?

Server stats

These screenshots are for different websites (1st is for nohandsseo.com, 2nd is for a servers worth of domains (not including NHSEO) and 3rd is a site I have been playing around with for a couple of years, there is no overlap in any of these domains). I would be happy to get a mod on TeamViewer and show him/her all of this to prove that I am not talking shit and I can even show them the stats from within NHSEO where I have been promoting them.

The thing is at the minute everyone is busy saying how badly they have been hit by the update rather than actually thinking what could have caused it by using critical thinking. I know lots of NHSEO users have been hit by the update, I also know there are users that have seen improvements, the difference is the website it is being used on.

Lithin said:

Ill vouch for it. Currently got 9 sites all running with it and only seen drop with one of them (have been running scrapebox blasts on it)
Some of the links you are getting are pr7+ with low OBL.

Click to expand...

Thanks Lithin, sometimes its like everyone is trying to tell me up is down lol.

leandrud said:

Sorry but I know this. All nofollow links It's not good for seo or link juice.

Click to expand...

You are wrong, but keep thinking that Good luck with all the stuff you KNOW. lol

Thanks a lot guys. I am really glad that people are starting to see that the latest update is more about content and the drops people are seeing is due to google suddenly changing its onsite/content criteria more than links.

I am having an issue now where when i hit Play and it starts running it just gets to "Threads Setup" then nothing happens....ever. It was working fine, now it completely just doesnt seem to work.... is anyone else having this issue?

sorry guys i am a noob to nhseo. what is "no hands seo"? Does it just mean use bots like Xrumer, Zenno or SeNuke X?

0_0
Read through this thread. Its a program.

WrightWilliams said:

I am having an issue now where when i hit Play and it starts running it just gets to "Threads Setup" then nothing happens....ever. It was working fine, now it completely just doesnt seem to work.... is anyone else having this issue?

Click to expand...

The status label is not to show what the tool is or isn't doing, you need to refer to the log to see what is happening. The latest versions actually have a message that states this so if you are not using the latest version you should update and then run it to see what is happening in the log. There are lots of new features and a few bug fixes in the latest version and after a week I there are no known bugs in it.

In GA I see that my site getting a lot of direct traffic, is it because of NHS?

Does NHS improve traffic or just ranking?