Telegram keeps banning the group i use to adding users in bulk, anyone can help?

Saddys

Newbie
Joined
Oct 5, 2026
Messages
10
Reaction score
6
I have my own code to scrape and add telegram members. Untill 1 year ago was working super fine. Now that i wanted to come back in business im not able to use the script anymore. I use telethon, i have a random delay that i keep at more than 60 seconds, i add the user in the contacts by username, i use private proxy. Ive also changed all the hardware information of the session files so every session looks like is on a different device. Im using 30 account rn, Every time that i reach more or less 30 members added i get this error

Your community Test has been flagged for review. After reviewing the reported content, we have found material that violates our Terms of Service. Access to the violating community has been disabled.

The decision has been taken as part of Telegram’s voluntary moderation measures.

The content was detected without using automated means.

The decision was made by a human moderator.

If you believe this was a mistake, you can appeal the decision here: [LINK REMOVED]

Subject to local laws, you may also contact a DSA-accredited out-of-court dispute settlement center for a non-binding review of your case, or local courts if applicable.

Telegram Support Team


Does anyone know why? I have thinked pretty much to everything. The only think i could be missing is an aged group.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good day, do you do standard inviting or invite via admin privileges?
Hey, thanks for answering. I do standard invites. Would you say that if i make all the 20 and more admin wuold change anything? If im not wrong, there is a limit of 50 admins. Last year i was using even more than 100. Im using not really good proxy. I was thinking to try some residential one but the price is really high. Tonight i think i will try with a group of 4 years ago. Lets see if anythings change.
 
Hey, thanks for answering. I do standard invites. Would you say that if i make all the 20 and more admin wuold change anything? If im not wrong, there is a limit of 50 admins. Last year i was using even more than 100. Im using not really good proxy. I was thinking to try some residential one but the price is really high. Tonight i think i will try with a group of 4 years ago. Lets see if anythings change.
I also have problems with invites, chats are flooded even from 100 invites, sometimes it allows you to fill up to 300 invites in 2 attempts, and if I use the quick method, it bans chats
 
I also have problems with invites, chats are flooded even from 100 invites, sometimes it allows you to fill up to 300 invites in 2 attempts, and if I use the quick method, it bans chats
Do you use your own script? What do you mean by quick method? Whats the safest one? Cause i think im using the quick one xd. Ive also tried private residential proxy but nothing wont change. I always get the same error after 30-40 members invited. Is alomst a week that im working on the script now. My last try will be tomorrow with a group older than 5 years. I really hope. Should we write ourself? 2 heads are better than 1 xd
 
You’re using a tactic that worked back in 2022 I know because I used to do it the exact same way using mass TDATAs, welcome back to member scraping on telegram - but it won’t work like you’re trying to do anymore.
 
You’re using a tactic that worked back in 2022 I know because I used to do it the exact same way using mass TDATAs, welcome back to member scraping on telegram - but it won’t work like you’re trying to do anymore.
Yo, thanks for the answer. So, what are you saying? Is it impossible to do it nowdays?
 
Do you use your own script? What do you mean by quick method? Whats the safest one? Cause i think im using the quick one xd. Ive also tried private residential proxy but nothing wont change. I always get the same error after 30-40 members invited. Is alomst a week that im working on the script now. My last try will be tomorrow with a group older than 5 years. I really hope. Should we write ourself? 2 heads are better than 1 xd
Yes, I have my own scripts, and I also have purchased ones from the old days.
The fast method is when 3,000-5,000 invites flood into the chat in a short period of time, and that's it. The chat is 100% flooded and no longer accepts invites.
The slow method is when you invite, say, 150-200-300 users to the chat every day. Groups used to accept a lot of them, meaning the chat shouldn't be flooded.
But neither method works for me now. With the fast method, I get banned immediately or at midnight, due to a bot abusing the owner.
With the slow method, chats accept few invites and the flooding begins, meaning the chats no longer accept invites. I've tried both groups with a lot of ease and new ones, and it makes no difference.

The screenshot shows my first result, a chat with absolutely no relief, freshly created, and I managed to invite about 1,600 users. And now I can’t even add 200.
1791445682445.png


You’re using a tactic that worked back in 2022 I know because I used to do it the exact same way using mass TDATAs, welcome back to member scraping on telegram - but it won’t work like you’re trying to do anymore.
I use the format Jason+session instead of TDATA.

maybe telegram is likely flagging the bulk adding i suggest you to stop mass adds and use telegrams official type invite links instead
You’re using a tactic that worked back in 2022 I know because I used to do it the exact same way using mass TDATAs, welcome back to member scraping on telegram - but it won’t work like you’re trying to do anymore.
Do you have any ideas or suggestions on how to invite now without running into anti-fraud issues?
I've done a tremendous amount of work, including content, links, and text. Each chat is completely unique, and networks aren't being detected.
I think I have a problem with the request script itself, because flooding is an error caused by repeating the same action, I assume. If you have any thoughts on this, I'd be happy to discuss it, and perhaps it will help us with the author of this post.
 
Stopped bulk inviting once groups kept dying around the 100 add mark, now I drop a useful post in a few niche channels and let people join themselves, fewer members but they actually reply
 
Yes, I have my own scripts, and I also have purchased ones from the old days.
The fast method is when 3,000-5,000 invites flood into the chat in a short period of time, and that's it. The chat is 100% flooded and no longer accepts invites.
The slow method is when you invite, say, 150-200-300 users to the chat every day. Groups used to accept a lot of them, meaning the chat shouldn't be flooded.
But neither method works for me now. With the fast method, I get banned immediately or at midnight, due to a bot abusing the owner.
With the slow method, chats accept few invites and the flooding begins, meaning the chats no longer accept invites. I've tried both groups with a lot of ease and new ones, and it makes no difference.

The screenshot shows my first result, a chat with absolutely no relief, freshly created, and I managed to invite about 1,600 users. And now I can’t even add 200.View attachment 550999


I use the format Jason+session instead of TDATA.



Do you have any ideas or suggestions on how to invite now without running into anti-fraud issues?
I've done a tremendous amount of work, including content, links, and text. Each chat is completely unique, and networks aren't being detected.
I think I have a problem with the request script itself, because flooding is an error caused by repeating the same action, I assume. If you have any thoughts on this, I'd be happy to discuss it, and perhaps it will help us with the author of this post.
Yoooo. Could be i made it. My group is alive from 1 day now, ive added 100 members. The abuse\fraude notification shouldnt be a problem anymore. Now i just do not know how many members will make me add. Last week no matter what i always got the notification that is on the first post. Was also this the reason why your group were getting banned right? Or your group are getting banned for others reasons? They still ban the admin?
 
Stopped bulk inviting once groups kept dying around the 100 add mark, now I drop a useful post in a few niche channels and let people join themselves, fewer members but they actually reply
Do you use neurocommentary software in channels or chats?
 
Yoooo. Could be i made it. My group is alive from 1 day now, ive added 100 members. The abuse\fraude notification shouldnt be a problem anymore. Now i just do not know how many members will make me add. Last week no matter what i always got the notification that is on the first post. Was also this the reason why your group were getting banned right? Or your group are getting banned for others reasons? They still ban the admin?
Btw now im buying 20\30 file sessions so for tonight we ll know if i understood how to not get banned. Is all about the group you use i believe, i hope so xd
 
If it dies at around 30 adds every run thats probably an automated limit and not user reports. Even with a 60s delay per session, 30 accounts hitting the same chat means an invite comes in every few seconds so it burns out pretty fast. Group age helps a bit but you probably need way fewer accounts and spread the invites out over the day
 
Yoooo. Could be i made it. My group is alive from 1 day now, ive added 100 members. The abuse\fraude notification shouldnt be a problem anymore. Now i just do not know how many members will make me add. Last week no matter what i always got the notification that is on the first post. Was also this the reason why your group were getting banned right? Or your group are getting banned for others reasons? They still ban the admin?
My chats accept 150-200, but the next day they are already in flood and no longer accept invites.
Did you find a solution, was your group still suspended
We'll check it now, but I don't think there's a solution yet.
Although I found a lot of problems in my script and spent the whole day yesterday fixing them.
I'll post the results after I get them. I hope the author will post theirs too.
 
Back
Top