40 days, 300 web 2.0 and 0 effects

[JasonXDC]

Could be anchor text being overoptimized , web 2.0 having bad content and not properly fleshed out with supporting pages and unique images.



New sites tend to be in a sandbox for a period of time. 40 days isn't long compared to many others I've seen.

Also, have you considered that a brand new site not getting any social interactions and traffic suddenly getting hundreds of links that have supporting tier two links is a dead giveaway footprint? If those web 2.0straffic also had no social signals to justify them getting tier two links, I think that's pretty much where the problem is.

 

[aidenhera]

you should make as many links to each of these webs as to your moneysite. lets say ahrefs shows u have 200 RD for moneysite, do that for each blog too and they will rank (on easy comp). if you are in all that tiering thing, many people dont get here if you fired gsa for 300 sites you would need at least 60000 do-follow links (300*200). from about 200 various domains and more. if your link building strategy bases on FRESH links that carry NO link juice then they need shitload of unique RD.

after that, make sure all your T2 links are indexed and each web;link profile is in quality of your moneysite then wait 40 days.

apart from parasites, when someone does FRESH links then i never saw someone ranking on easy kw without at least 200 unique RD on ahrefs (ahrefs crawls about 1/20 anyway so you imagine how many fresh links you need!)

 

[olo555]

The sites are too young. Did you use aged domains? If not then building all these links to a brand new site will likely do more harm than good. Also expect 2 to 3 months for new links to kick in.

No, domains are fresh.

In order to make the most out of links, you should make sure to dripfed them naturally and spice it up with some links of a different kind. A website getting 300 backlinks from five different web2.0s in one day does is not very natural.

Also, did you make sure to use a good mixture of different anchor texts?



This should not matter too much, I doubt tumblr and wordpress tell Google the IP of blog owners

20% exact anchor, rest is generic and urls

Following this! but yes alarm bells at the rate - manually created or software? Same emails,ips,text-spun, and how many articles?

Software created
Different emails
Created by private proxies
90 spintax articles.

you should make as many links to each of these webs as to your moneysite. lets say ahrefs shows u have 200 RD for moneysite, do that for each blog too and they will rank (on easy comp). if you are in all that tiering thing, many people dont get here if you fired gsa for 300 sites you would need at least 60000 do-follow links (300*200). from about 200 various domains and more. if your link building strategy bases on FRESH links that carry NO link juice then they need shitload of unique RD.

after that, make sure all your T2 links are indexed and each web;link profile is in quality of your moneysite then wait 40 days.

apart from parasites, when someone does FRESH links then i never saw someone ranking on easy kw without at least 200 unique RD on ahrefs (ahrefs crawls about 1/20 anyway so you imagine how many fresh links you need!)

I made about 30k links to each post on the blogs.

 

[aidenhera]

No, domains are fresh.



20% exact anchor, rest is generic and urls



Software created
Different emails
Created by private proxies
90 spintax articles.



I made about 30k links to each post on the blogs.

do you see what you post? lol you can have 1% exact anchor.


u made 30k to each post? thats too much.

 

[olo555]

do you see what you post? lol you can have 1% exact anchor.


u made 30k to each post? thats too much.

1% its not too small? Yes i made 30 k to each post

 

[MisterF]

1% its not too small? Yes i made 30 k to each post

Wow, is all I can say.

40 days old website, has 200 Tier 1 all from Wordpress. com, with spun articles and each has 30k links.....
You wonder why your sites are doomed ?

Is this a churn and burn experiment ?

 

[aidenhera]

Wow, is all I can say.

40 days old website, has 200 Tier 1 all from Wordpress. com, with spun articles and each has 30k links.....
You wonder why your sites are doomed ?

Is this a churn and burn experiment ?

probably none of these 30k*200(or more)=6000000+ links are in the index, so theres hope

 

[olo555]

probably none of these 30k*200(or more)=6000000+ links are in the index, so theres hope

They are indexed my friend.

 

[jingsaw]

[QUOTE = "olo555, post: 9987960, Mitglied: 137100"] Vielleicht was soll ich jetzt machen? [/ QUOTE]
You are German right?

 

[bartosimpsonio]

No, domains are fresh.

IMO too aggressive link building for a new domain. Just my 2 cents.

 

[denzero]

Seems like you built your links too fast , all you can do now is wait

 

[olo555]

[QUOTE = "olo555, post: 9987960, Mitglied: 137100"] Vielleicht was soll ich jetzt machen? [/ QUOTE]
You are German right?

No Im not,but near

IMO too aggressive link building for a new domain. Just my 2 cents.

What do you suggest for fresh domains?

 

[Nargil]

The more links you build in a short time period, the more devalued they will get. Plus, fresh web 2.0s with spun content and on the same platform have close to zero firepower.

I have one website, used expired niche relevant domain for it. Nothing amazing, like 40RD. Targeting some 2.5K MS keywords. Added articles, let it rest, put 10 different expired web 2.0s to main money article and haven't done fuckall with it a couple months and now it's in top 10 for main terms. With basically zero SEO effort. The slower you take it these days, the better it will be for you.

SEO is not for impatient. Never has been, but now, patience is even more important than ever before. Survival of the fittest in the IM space.

 

[olo555]

The more links you build in a short time period, the more devalued they will get. Plus, fresh web 2.0s with spun content and on the same platform have close to zero firepower.

I have one website, used expired niche relevant domain for it. Nothing amazing, like 40RD. Targeting some 2.5K MS keywords. Added articles, let it rest, put 10 different expired web 2.0s to main money article and haven't done fuckall with it a couple months and now it's in top 10 for main terms. With basically zero SEO effort. The slower you take it these days, the better it will be for you.

SEO is not for impatient. Never has been, but now, patience is even more important than ever before. Survival of the fittest in the IM space.

Hi Nargil! Thanks for good advices

 

[transitarea]

I have also tried this with link pyramid, link wheel...etc with no effect. I waited for long months and still nothing.

 

[Nestory]

I hope you don't write the content of your websites by yourself mate.

is no = no or know?

 

[Will It Profit]

You are linkbuilding like it is 2010 again.

A handful of PBNs or expired Web 2.0s with unique content would have been much better than all that, and less work too.

 

[marcuses]

I will suggest you stop any link building you are thinking right now and blast your money site with lots of social signals

 

[olo555]

I will suggest you stop any link building you are thinking right now and blast your money site with lots of social signals

Do You know some good services ?

 

[dhf123]

Hi, i have some problem with my 2 websites . I created 2 websites 40 days ago.

I maked 300 web 2.0 for each website. Build tier 2 for them. Links are indexed , and my website are not even top 100 :/ Sites are indexed and they are in GWT. Its first time when i see something like this. Websites have about 90 points in google pagespeed and gtmerix.

I don't know what to do. If someone have some ideas please share

Thanks for the answers.

i used to care about the google pagespeed bla bla score, it's useless bro if u asked the guru
my advice: dripfeed and build links naturally, it's slow but it has to be that way