[Quick Case Study] - Ranking Web 2.0 Sites using GSA and 301 Shorteners in 2017
- Thread starter moonlighsunligh
- Start date
pj777777
Power Member
- Nov 12, 2014
- 699
- 365
I am doing something very similar.
Making web 2.0>generating 301 redirects>generating 100-200 backlinks to 301's.
Been doing this for around a month or so.
No positive or negative effects as of yet.
Nb keyword difficulty around 20-30 in research and around 90-320 sv.
This is a very quick process. If it doesn't produce $$ it is a lesson learnt and a bit more experience under my belt
I will try a new web 2.0 today with similar sv, but higher value products and add in more lsi to main web 2.0 and an old school link wheel ;-)
PJ
Making web 2.0>generating 301 redirects>generating 100-200 backlinks to 301's.
Been doing this for around a month or so.
No positive or negative effects as of yet.
Nb keyword difficulty around 20-30 in research and around 90-320 sv.
This is a very quick process. If it doesn't produce $$ it is a lesson learnt and a bit more experience under my belt
I will try a new web 2.0 today with similar sv, but higher value products and add in more lsi to main web 2.0 and an old school link wheel ;-)
PJ
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
Thanks. The blast is done, I decided to do 20k comments in order to get faster results.
A bit strange month and no results/change.
Did you do other kinds of links or just the shorteners?
You just remainded me that I should take a look at keyword density. I usually use 9 mention of keywords in a 400-500 word article but this could be too high sometimes ... have to analyse. But sometimes works.
A bit strange month and no results/change.
Did you do other kinds of links or just the shorteners?
You just remainded me that I should take a look at keyword density. I usually use 9 mention of keywords in a 400-500 word article but this could be too high sometimes ... have to analyse. But sometimes works.
Last edited:
I am doing something very similar.
Making web 2.0>generating 301 redirects>generating 100-200 backlinks to 301's.
Been doing this for around a month or so.
No positive or negative effects as of yet.
Nb keyword difficulty around 20-30 in research and around 90-320 sv.
This is a very quick process. If it doesn't produce $$ it is a lesson learnt and a bit more experience under my belt
I will try a new web 2.0 today with similar sv, but higher value products and add in more lsi to main web 2.0 and an old school link wheel ;-)
PJ
What sort of success with indexing are you seeing ?
I'd have thought after a month there'd be some type of effect.
W9go
Elite Member
- May 16, 2011
- 5,841
- 1,308
I am doing something very similar.
Making web 2.0>generating 301 redirects>generating 100-200 backlinks to 301's.
Been doing this for around a month or so.
No positive or negative effects as of yet.
Nb keyword difficulty around 20-30 in research and around 90-320 sv.
This is a very quick process. If it doesn't produce $$ it is a lesson learnt and a bit more experience under my belt
I will try a new web 2.0 today with similar sv, but higher value products and add in more lsi to main web 2.0 and an old school link wheel ;-)
PJ
you should make more links to the 301 .... spam them
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
He is maybe using PBN links ...
geneticwaste
Regular Member
- Apr 4, 2008
- 334
- 78
Interesting, keep us posted
Scraper9
Power Member
- Feb 8, 2015
- 662
- 742
Nice of you to open such threads, unfortunately 90% of all ''ranking case studies'' on BHW are never finished. They open threads start posting stuff and after few weeks the threads is dead and when someone comes after month or two and bumb the thread by asking ''any updates'' the OP is hiding like a mice even thought you can see him posting around the forums. Hope you are not one of these guys. Good luck.
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
It is easy to update a thread.It can work or not if not 301 direct links or something else could.
Curent stats: #21 (was #22 but that is likely just dancing)
Curent stats: #21 (was #22 but that is likely just dancing)
Black_Balls
Registered Member
- Jan 21, 2012
- 75
- 3
when the kw diffiicult is so low you can even use social signals to rank that site without a risk of a penalty..
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
No, because I use articles on T2 not comments.
No movements so far, but it is too early.
No movements so far, but it is too early.
Last edited:
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
Didnt try social signals, I mean i never saw something is ranked due to FB likes.
It can be ranked in multiple ways I am testing this one.
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
So far no change at all - it is still dancing on the third page. It is 5-th day after the blast.
It seems it takes longer than before to rank a web 2.0 site.
But I got today a new domain, added a video from youtube, created video sitemap, submited to google and after 10 minutes I am already on the first page for an easy kw and the site is indexed.
It seems it takes longer than before to rank a web 2.0 site.
But I got today a new domain, added a video from youtube, created video sitemap, submited to google and after 10 minutes I am already on the first page for an easy kw and the site is indexed.