Где вы живёте в России?do you really rely on PR to understand the weight of the link from this page????
you crazy??!!
Is the weight value of the link?
It's the stone age!!!
You don't know what the weight of the links depends STRONGLY on the anchor links?
Not the ANKOR put on the website with PR8 and no weight, the link will not pass!!! Do you not understand? And are willing to pay 1000 dollars for a link from page pr=8??!!
you do not mind the money?
new Russian technology
- Thread starter tar729
- Start date
-
- Tags
- seo transistors
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
москва
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
to help you understand. Tourist site in Russia-is the sum of the reference weights of each of the pages.
And the number of TCI, which has a website does not depend on the weight of the link.
just as the weight of the links does not depend on what kind of PR on the donor page.
It's a shame not to know these things
And the number of TCI, which has a website does not depend on the weight of the link.
just as the weight of the links does not depend on what kind of PR on the donor page.
It's a shame not to know these things
Я в Петербурге. Я хотел чтобы вы научили меня
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
the weight of the links depends entirely on other things.
1) from the traffic page
2) from the ctr of link anchor text
3) relevance of the donor in the link anchor text
4) how much the donor is complementary to the acceptor in the sense of
PR is a metric that is indirectly related to these things. And you use it. For any anchor links
Ah-ha-ha
And so you do not spoil the ranking in Google with this method of evaluation, PR and removed.
And in Russia, to measure the weight of links on the above metrics.
The error that you have on assessing the weight of links on a PR - factor, at least 400%
And that's the minimum!!! Imagine how much money you spend in vain?
1) from the traffic page
2) from the ctr of link anchor text
3) relevance of the donor in the link anchor text
4) how much the donor is complementary to the acceptor in the sense of
PR is a metric that is indirectly related to these things. And you use it. For any anchor links
Ah-ha-ha
And so you do not spoil the ranking in Google with this method of evaluation, PR and removed.
And in Russia, to measure the weight of links on the above metrics.
The error that you have on assessing the weight of links on a PR - factor, at least 400%
And that's the minimum!!! Imagine how much money you spend in vain?
D
Deleted member 719276
Guest
Is OP on drugs or ?
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
вы свободно говорите по русски?
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
I try to give you maximum information. I'm sorry that you chose the trolling instead of obtaining important information.
Нет. Я в России только 6 месяцев. Я пытаюсь хорошо говорить
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
я открыт к сотрудничеству. я хочу выйти на этот рынок. мне тесно в россии.
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
well...what to do....the difficulties of translation.
learn Russian gentlemen, if you want to understand more
I also do Not learn English joke
I think... if there is a desire, we are able to understand each other.
Until I see that the Western market is in deep ignorance about the reference ranking algorithms.
Я думал что вы уже на нём
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
нет. Это моя первая попытка рассказать об этих технологиях на английском форуме.
И проблем я вижу много. В первую очередь низкий уровень западных оптимизаторов.
Нужна довольно большая просветительская деятельность.
web_riches
Regular Member
- Feb 9, 2010
- 328
- 263
My take on this....
Looks like he is saying...
Item 1
Your money site. Let's say it's about dog collars.
You point a bunch of Web 2.0 properties to that site with the keyword "dog collars"
Item 2
You build a second site (a satellite site) with a similar keyword like "best dog collars" and have Web 2.0 properties pointing at it. You have links in that site the points to your main moneymaking site.
Item 3
You build a third site (another satellite site) that points to item 2, and again use a similar keyword such as "ways to walk dogs". Again of Web 2.0 properties pointing to it.
Using this method you create link authority and domain authority and consequently your site would appear higher in search rankings.
That is what I got from all this...
Looks like he is saying...
Item 1
Your money site. Let's say it's about dog collars.
You point a bunch of Web 2.0 properties to that site with the keyword "dog collars"
Item 2
You build a second site (a satellite site) with a similar keyword like "best dog collars" and have Web 2.0 properties pointing at it. You have links in that site the points to your main moneymaking site.
Item 3
You build a third site (another satellite site) that points to item 2, and again use a similar keyword such as "ways to walk dogs". Again of Web 2.0 properties pointing to it.
Using this method you create link authority and domain authority and consequently your site would appear higher in search rankings.
That is what I got from all this...
Они не поверят, пока вы докажете им и надо правильно и хорошо говорить по английски
tar729
Regular Member
- Jun 27, 2016
- 265
- 223
the translation is terrible. I gave a link to the source. the best way would be to find a translator. let postupku:
ask one specific question and we will try to make it so that you understood him correctly as possible.
recap will be late.
Until I see translation complete misunderstanding or inconsistency due to translation problems.