new Russian technology

tar729

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Messages
265
Reaction score
223
have you ever had something to hear about the amps relevance?
We are talking about technology developed in 2009 in Russia, which was called seo transistors.
the amplifier consists of three sites. two satellites and one customer
The secret in the first two sites made for two different semantic cores.
Single site information and uses the semantic core of a non-commercial search queries. Another commercial website and uses semantic core, consisting of commercial queries in the same topic. Both satellites have the same key in the title. But that's not all. Sites have symmetrically opposite structure, see screenshot http://yagooart.ru/tranzistor.jpg

But that's not all. The secret to gain in the positive feedback that occurs inside of the search algorithm. As a result, with each update of the calculation of the reference weight is increased the relevance of the first two sites and they both are alternating race to the TOP.
ask questions. Case studies.
 
I don't understand what this thread is all about. Nothing makes sense. And the sites depicted in the image seemed to look the same.
 
My first question :
What are you talking about ??
I'm talking about the technology of promotion of sites. about SEO technology. This forum SEO professionals?
 
and the name...
you forgot the name
seo transistors
ridiculous and naive to think that high rankings can only be achieved with quality and interesting content :)
In fact, SEO also exists to manipulate the results. Isn't it?
sorry for my English. I use Google translate.
 
Nowadays, 2016, the OP is talking about

and it was

That's it!
the fundamental principles of the ranking does not change, but only improve. So all this is still relevant now. There are multiple confirmations.
We are talking about feedback INSIDE the ALGORITHM, about which you cannot even imagine. And due to this feedback, and there are trigger shift relevantnoise satellites at a time.
 
I don't understand what this thread is all about. Nothing makes sense. And the sites depicted in the image seemed to look the same.
the arrows in the figure show the direction of references in the anchors. and it is perfectly clear that this area is different.
In one case links go from the home page and in the other case the main.
This difference in structure suggests a different approach to search engines for ranking sites. But you about these differences, I do not know :)
 
tar729, you wanna go technical? OK. What transistors are you talking about? MOSTFET, bipolar, etc? What feedback are you talking about? Negative or positive?
 
tar729, you wanna go technical? OK. What transistors are you talking about? MOSTFET, bipolar, etc? What feedback are you talking about? Negative or positive?
technically, the algorithms of Google and Yandex are some differences. if we talk about the reference ranking, search engine Yandex is more perfect. So you still have to face the fact that we in Russia are long gone :) Google has Got its benefits, but rather, they are administrative in nature, not algorithmic.
From the specifics of the Russian mentality seo in Russia has chosen another way. We have a very highly developed industry of automatic promotion of sites. Many brilliant minds have worked on the automation for that part of Russian seo specialists a long time ahead of you. Other aspects on the contrary, greatly subsided Google to them the undisputed leader. But that's part of the reference algorithms in Yandex and reverse engineering seo experts, we broke away from you for 3-5 years. it is a fact.
I could tell you a lot about how actually works, nofollow in Google. Because you think that the reference in nofollow does not transfer weight. But it's not. moreover, the referring website receives a bonus of trust.
This causes positive feedback in the transistor.
 
If it was developped by russian guys, there is a chance it was aimed toward yandex.
I don't beleive yandex and google respond the same way to the same seo technique.
However what you are saying isn't shocking or dumb, since it would be two backlinks from topically related websites, one with commercial intent and the other one being informative.
 
But it's not. moreover, the referring website receives a bonus of trust.
This causes positive feedback in the transistor.

Oh, a positive feedback? In the transistor device? It causes a generation also. Most of amp engineers hate it.
 
Oh, a positive feedback? In the transistor device? It causes a generation also. Most of amp engineers hate it.
positive feedback occurs because of the bonus trust, which is formed but the donor.
The search engine calculates the bonus for the relevant link from the donor.
You only used to ensure that the trust can flow from the donor. But I don't know what a useful reference it again and accrue to the donor.
And this is one of the fundamental principles of the reference ranking.
Both sites in transistor manufacturing have the same relevance, but for entirely different reasons. And are approximately at the same positions.
One website has its position at the expense of the trust, which got the main page with links to internal. And the other site got its relevance due to the pumping of the text of the main page in the related queries with the main. we are talking about semantic graph.

When the first two sites perelinkovat the trust is glued to the semantics. The first gain relevance.
I hope you know that link weight has two options of the transfer?
1) trust
2) semantic weight

And then the recalculation of the link weight algorithm is an increase in confidence in the first website, because now he refers to the second site and position it higher. that is referred to a more relevant area and gets more confidence. Then this link pumped the second site and the cycle repeats.
Thus, each reference update sites increase their relevance alternating in the search results. The first outperforms the second. I have screenshots of these processes. and in the end both sites are built in TOP1 and TOP2 followed each other :)
 
Seems that OP is trying to help.
Op,can you translate the Transistor into English for us?
tranzistor.jpg


Thank you :)
 
If it was developped by russian guys, there is a chance it was aimed toward yandex.
I don't beleive yandex and google respond the same way to the same seo technique.
However what you are saying isn't shocking or dumb, since it would be two backlinks from topically related websites, one with commercial intent and the other one being informative.
alas, but the fundamental principles are in this sense identical.
 
Seems that OP is trying to help.
Op,can you translate the Transistor into English for us?
tranzistor.jpg


Thank you :)
I do not speak English. All I can do is give you a link to the source and use Google translator. The picture in General, and so it's pretty simple.
the first two website is just the satellites with different structure and the third promoted website.http://yagooart.ru/tranzistor
 
Back
Top