Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[billy735]

Gold package placed.
PayPal Transaction ID: 0D115762NR9008707

 

[caliphproton]

do you have samples or review ?

 

[hanssolo]

►►► 10% OFF COUPON CODE: GIVEME10
HURRY! 2 PACKAGES ONLY
Ranking Proof for today (13 Apr):

​

 

[Adevictus]

Ordered 2 gold packages:
Transaction ID: 1CF91199FS04648
Transaction ID: 57D056119L5421637

 

[hanssolo]

Ranking Proof for today (14 Apr):

​

 

[yukinara88]

Placed order..

Transaction ID #580X

Please confirm it.. Thanks.

 

[euclideanbell]

Here is my 30 day update:

Positions
KW1 - POS1 >>POS1
KW2 - POS11 >> POS5
KW3 - POS10 >> POS5

Will be ordering again this month

 

[alexsopot]

Can you send me samples please?

 

[Mister Digital]

Here is my 30 day update:

Positions
KW1 - POS1 >>POS1
KW2 - POS11 >> POS5
KW3 - POS10 >> POS5

Will be ordering again this month

Which package did you order?

 

[hanssolo]

Ranking Proof for today (15 Apr):

​

 

[pitbully]

While the credentials of the domains, sites and network might be solid, I was disappointed with the quality of the text in the articles. Yes there's a relevant picture there and yes power of the link might be there, but any human who reads through any one of these articles will know right away that it's either been spun 600 times or was written by a terrible writer.

More importantly, anybody from Google or any other type of authority that might check on a site's backlinks would instantly know that these posts were done for the link and nothing else. A solid high quality backlink in 2016, as this thread portrays to offer, is one that looks natural even under a manual review. Am I a tougher critic than some? Maybe, but backlinks are a delicate subject and "high quality" links might be used for a serious project that can be ruined by over spun garbage like this.

 

[LeanLow]

While the credentials of the domains, sites and network might be solid, I was disappointed with the quality of the text in the articles. Yes there's a relevant picture there and yes power of the link might be there, but any human who reads through any one of these articles will know right away that it's either been spun 600 times or was written by a terrible writer.

More importantly, anybody from Google or any other type of authority that might check on a site's backlinks would instantly know that these posts were done for the link and nothing else. A solid high quality backlink in 2016, as this thread portrays to offer, is one that looks natural even under a manual review. Am I a tougher critic than some? Maybe, but backlinks are a delicate subject and "high quality" links might be used for a serious project that can be ruined by over spun garbage like this.

It's impossible to have a public PBN domain that looks like a real site, think about it... If you want content that will pass a manual review the articles would cost 10$ each and the price of the service would be at least x4 higher no one would buy it because competitors would be using cheaper content and charging less.

 

[AffiliatePrograms]

i Also want some metric information?

 

[anjalisharam]

I am really interested after checking the review but want to see some of your sample work before placing the order. Please provide the copy of your sample words and few article urls.

 

[pitbully]

It's impossible to have a public PBN domain that looks like a real site, think about it... If you want content that will pass a manual review the articles would cost 10$ each and the price of the service would be at least x4 higher no one would buy it because competitors would be using cheaper content and charging less.

This is ridiculous. EVERYBODY should want articles that will pass a manual review. In today's SEO game, anything less is not only a waste of money but a guaranteed death sentence for whatever site those links are pointing to. Luckily for me I'm experienced enough that I sent my first order to a site that I don't care about, as far as ranking in search engines goes, but many other people won't be so lucky.

I'm sick of so many sellers on BHW selling "high quality" and "manually re-written" articles/links just so they can get your money and then they spew out some bullshit article that might as well be waving a red flag. If these articles were re-written then the person who re-wrote my articles must be retarded. I understand that articles need to be spun if you don't want to pay extremely high prices for link packages, but there's a right way and a wrong way to spin an article and the examples I read through in my report were a nightmare.

 

[pitbully]

You can keep the money but please remove the articles and/or links from my order. I'm better off without them.

 

[Mister Digital]

Order made for Gold package ID transaction ending 46219

 

[Penumbra]

So articles are not unique?

 

[Penumbra]

Placed order for Siver Package to try out this service, will post review.
Transaction ID: 5T012369JH3994016

 

[hanssolo]

I am really interested after checking the review but want to see some of your sample work before placing the order. Please provide the copy of your sample words and few article urls.

We don't share actual urls but article samples were sent via pm~ Please check

You can keep the money but please remove the articles and/or links from my order. I'm better off without them.

Yes we will do that no problem~

So articles are not unique?

All articles are uniquely handwritten by a team of writers~

i Also want some metric information?

Here are the metrics we stick to when we acquire our domains since V2: PR3-6, DA30+, PA35+,TF15+,CF20+, Age 3+. (Please keep in mind that these metrics might drop over time due to loss of links.)

Ranking Proof for today (19 Apr):

​