Sent to your PM box. Thanks![]()
Any chance of a reply to my support ticket?
Ok so I just took a look at your batches. The web 2.0 batch that contains 846 links is set to drip feed, and only 83 have been processed. I checked the first 10 links out of the 83 processed links manually and discovered that 7 of them have been indexed. That's a 70% indexing rate!
As for the other batches and link types, the links were built on very spammy sites. No matter what you do, you can't get a good indexing rate on those spammy links with dynamic urls. Besides, dynamic urls have a poor indexing rate because they look like duplicate urls to Google, and many of the links you submitted have dynamic urls, are built on spammy sites, or both.
Waiting to hear from youlooks interesting will get back to you soon.
Hi, for my current status on the forum I can't send PM, I will create a ticket under username like this, is this ok?50% off coupon still available![]()
Pm sent to youany new deal for newbie
Ticket answeredHi, for my current status on the forum I can't send PM, I will create a ticket under username like this, is this ok?
Looking for a discount. Only submitting about 100 links per day, but need API.
Discount code sentCan I have the 50% coupon please ?
Please open a ticket on our support platform so we can take a look at your account and links. It's here: https://hkseo.groovehq.com.yesterday i brought one hour indexing (sad without discount) i added links and set process to (0) so all links will process instant. Within just a minute all links showing processed. But not even 1 got index. How the services works ??? Please Let me know
Hey man, thanks for your assessment and sorry it's not doing as well as you'd hoped.Review
Let me start by saying I tested this service with my guard up due to what not only myself but many others know to be a rigged sponsored blog post on the Matthew Woodward blog to try get this service business.
I have put the service through EXTENSIVE testing over the past few days ranging from high quality web 2.0's, low quality web 2.0's, High Quality GSA SER Contextual platforms and Low Quality GSA SER Contextual platforms. The evidence suggests this is unfortunately another snake oil product that simply does not work. High quality web 2.0's are holding at around 30% indexed after the index dance, low quality web 2.0s and GSA SER platforms are around the 0%-5% index mark.
Sure there are plenty of reasons why these links may not have indexed and the OP has most of them to hand in an attempt to defend this service but to put things into perspective, a rival indexing service over the same time frame on test batches of URLs on the same platforms has around 70% high quality web 2.0s with between 30%-50% of the SER platforms indexed.
Customer support also lacks with the service, I had a support ticket open and did not receive a response for a number of days while the service providers were active on the forum.
Consider yourself warned by not only my own review but also THIS review, THIS review and THIS review!
DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY!