Scrapebox doesn't harvest a single URL! :(

[Seljo]

Just testing now Gscraper + Nohandsproxies, it just blazing fast, I loaded up contextual footprints from GSA and I'm getting 13600 LPM.

Just insane I'm already at 2900000 urls

Scraping hands down Gscraper wins over Scrapebox. But the simplicty and loads of other useful things Scrapebox wins.

 

[zenlagor]

I have the same issue as Monie, only private proxies can harvest anything in Scrapebox. I figure this will be fixed in the new scrapebox as my proxies work fine in Gscraper and for other stuff.

 

[hatblackguy]

try scraping with private "socks proxies" Scrapebox works best with those

 

[nutserious]

Anyone getting the Error 503? I started using today and after one set of scraping, I'm getting Error 503. Note I'm not using any proxies.

 

[Monie]

Just testing now Gscraper + Nohandsproxies, it just blazing fast, I loaded up contextual footprints from GSA and I'm getting 13600 LPM.

Just insane I'm already at 2900000 urls

Scraping hands down Gscraper wins over Scrapebox. But the simplicty and loads of other useful things Scrapebox wins.

Wow that's insane? But 13600 LPM? Are you sure you didn't add an extra zero there? Are you scraping based on the footprints of a particular CMS? Any rankings improvements as a result of these links?

 

[Seljo]

Wow that's insane? But 13600 LPM? Are you sure you didn't add an extra zero there? Are you scraping based on the footprints of a particular CMS? Any rankings improvements as a result of these links?

No mistake there. I'm scraping and feeding gsa to build links. Its fascinating on the solidseovps screaming plan , I'm runing GSA SER with 800 threads + gscraper with 150 threads cpu usage is 28% LOL.

But I have to admit I have to work on my footprints as I get loads of duplicate urls so vrom a list of about 7900000 links I got 290000 uniqe domains as I'm looking only for xpressengine, budypress and zendesk.

Will update when I get GSA to go trough them.

 

[Monie]

No mistake there. I'm scraping and feeding gsa to build links. Its fascinating on the solidseovps screaming plan , I'm runing GSA SER with 800 threads + gscraper with 150 threads cpu usage is 28% LOL.

But I have to admit I have to work on my footprints as I get loads of duplicate urls so vrom a list of about 7900000 links I got 290000 uniqe domains as I'm looking only for xpressengine, budypress and zendesk.

Will update when I get GSA to go trough them.

Cool. Keep us updated and say when you have any rankings improvements when actually building these links to your site. I think this is a sure fire way to consistently get google-friendly contextual links and boost your SERPS.

 

[Seljo]

With contextual links you get serp rise as I'm doing right now.
Problem is keeping this links alive as you have qualty content so they don't get deleted. And for many of these platforms you need DBC which is expensive.

 

[Monie]

With contextual links you get serp rise as I'm doing right now.
Problem is keeping this links alive as you have qualty content so they don't get deleted. And for many of these platforms you need DBC which is expensive.

What is DBC? Also you might you want to try Content Foundry for auto generated content. I have heard that it's good.

 

[DannyZhang]

DBC is death by captcha. Manual captcha solving, won't recommend it with GSA though. It will burn a hole in your pocket.

 

[Sweetfunny]

Just testing now Gscraper + Nohandsproxies, it just blazing fast, I loaded up contextual footprints from GSA and I'm getting 13600 LPM.

Just insane I'm already at 2900000 urls

Scraping hands down Gscraper wins over Scrapebox. But the simplicty and loads of other useful things Scrapebox wins.

You might be an ideal candidate. Feel like testing something with ScrapeBox if you have a spare few moments? If so please send an email to support AT scrapebox.com

 

[Monie]

Look at the results I got with Gscraper free version today with proxies from No Hands Proxies. 30k URLs per minute. :O It stopped at 100000 URLs after a few minutes.



Definitely buying Gscraper. Scrapebox clearly has a problem with how it handles partially working large public proxy lists.

 

[nutserious]

Did you get nohands seo proxes for free or can I get them through the trial version?

 

[Sweetfunny]

Look at the results I got with Gscraper free version today with proxies from No Hands Proxies. 30k URLs per minute. :O It stopped at 100000 URLs after a few minutes.

View attachment 54377

Definitely buying Gscraper. Scrapebox clearly has a problem with how it handles partially working large public proxy lists.

Every second URL is the Google cache links, so when these are removed it would be 15k URL's minute?

The ScrapeBox v2.0 is a lot faster, here's 110,000 URL's minute sustained over 1 million harvested urls using free public proxies just from ScrapeBox using the same footprints as your screenshot. I only done Google, but Yahoo and Bing are even faster i've managed twice the speed with them.

 

[Seljo]

Wow Is scrapebox 2.0 already released ?

 

[Monie]

Did you get nohands seo proxes for free or can I get them through the trial version?

The 7 day trial is fully functional. You can test it out before buying it. Keep in mind - "No Hands SEO" and "No Hands Proxies" are two different softwares.

 

[Seljo]

Buy nohandsproxies is cheap and delivers loads of fresh proxies, I'm very satisfied.

 

[hatblackguy]

Every second URL is the Google cache links, so when these are removed it would be 15k URL's minute?

Agreed not only that Gscraper alway's drain's system resources badly

The ScrapeBox v2.0 is a lot faster, here's 110,000 URL's minute sustained over 1 million harvested urls using free public proxies just from ScrapeBox using the same footprints as your screenshot. I only done Google, but Yahoo and Bing are even faster i've managed twice the speed with them.

View attachment 54380

Awesome stats so excited for Scrapebox V2.0

 

[nutserious]

Anyone know how to scan for a proxies? From my understanding, you either harvest or scan for proxies. Second question are these paid software really that good? Are there no free alternative which do exactly the same thing at the same speed? Like all of them come with public proxy seed list, how do these different software differentiate.

 

[hatblackguy]

Scanning then testing is such a waste of time the best thing to do is use services which already pre do that for you BHW MarketPlace

Anyone know how to scan for a proxies? From my understanding, you either harvest or scan for proxies. Second question are these paid software really that good? Are there no free alternative which do exactly the same thing at the same speed? Like all of them come with public proxy seed list, how do these different software differentiate.