ask.fm? I dont think so
will google + be more popular than twitter, fb in future?
- Thread starter vordarac
- Start date
IMpossible
Supreme Member
- Apr 15, 2012
- 1,344
- 304
Google won't go down. LOL!
robinsousa
Newbie
- Dec 30, 2011
- 13
- 1
We still don't know what will be the next big social network.
One thing I believe and many people are already coming to the same conclusion is that facebook will soon get to it's peak of users and will suffer a drastic drop. So if it's gonna be g+ or a new one nobody knows.
On the other hand, Twitter is in a good health currently so I suppose it will continue growing as it did till now.
One thing I believe and many people are already coming to the same conclusion is that facebook will soon get to it's peak of users and will suffer a drastic drop. So if it's gonna be g+ or a new one nobody knows.
On the other hand, Twitter is in a good health currently so I suppose it will continue growing as it did till now.
Last edited:
lietuvis002
BANNED
- Aug 3, 2012
- 2,385
- 2,589
Why are you so sure?
IMpossible
Supreme Member
- Apr 15, 2012
- 1,344
- 304
Because their main product, "Google Search" is and will always be on top. Don't worry about Google+ vs. Facebook. It doesn't matter that much. It's just being dramatized by media. Google also knows that they have no chance against Facebook. The ONLY purpose of Google+ is to "disturb" Facebook and get some of the FB users to leave FB and come to Google+, not to be bigger and better than them.
Google have had a massive opportunity to dominate the Social Media arena and have failed miserably. It's hard to understand really.
It starts with the lack of clear definition of its offerings. Your average Joe struggles to understand how Google plus differs from Google Places (if indeed understanding the difference is important to them). They both to this day look the same. Then when google invite you to conjoin the two it really gets confusing.
FB has hitherto suffered for exactly the same reasons but ultimately it is easier to see grasp the differences between personal accounts and business accounts in FB.
With the easy integration between FB and Twitter that Google lacks with those platforms, I can only assume Google's heart really isn't in this market. It couldn't get it more wrong if it tried.
But that doesn't make sense.
It starts with the lack of clear definition of its offerings. Your average Joe struggles to understand how Google plus differs from Google Places (if indeed understanding the difference is important to them). They both to this day look the same. Then when google invite you to conjoin the two it really gets confusing.
FB has hitherto suffered for exactly the same reasons but ultimately it is easier to see grasp the differences between personal accounts and business accounts in FB.
With the easy integration between FB and Twitter that Google lacks with those platforms, I can only assume Google's heart really isn't in this market. It couldn't get it more wrong if it tried.
But that doesn't make sense.
Lets see how BEBO kicks off
I think G+ will eventually grow.
They have improved it a lot and they work on it on a daily basis, so I don't see how not.
yeah I'm waiting what bebo will offer...when does it start tho?
IMpossible
Supreme Member
- Apr 15, 2012
- 1,344
- 304
Lets see how BEBO kicks off
I think G+ will eventually grow.
They have improved it a lot and they work on it on a daily basis, so I don't see how not.
How do you think Google+ can grow when it is no real alternative to Facebook?
It has to be worth it, otherwise why would you switch from FB to Google+?
saketanand
Registered Member
- Jan 7, 2014
- 85
- 6
nope... not possible
lancis
Elite Member
- Jul 31, 2010
- 1,682
- 2,443
Flying dicks is all I see on their site. Interesting way to attract new users.
Techxan
Elite Member
- Dec 7, 2011
- 3,091
- 3,620
Facebook, twitter, digg, reddit, stumbeupon, pinterets, and all the rest are what they are because they offered something someone else doesn't at least when the grew their fanbase.
At some point they were innovating.
Google is not offering anything new, and they are not going to succeed until they do, unless they invest for the long term. In 20 years who knows what will be the big thing? Google can fund 20 years easily.
But I dont see it being anything but a wannabe for the next half decade or so. Matt Cutts has come tight iout and said it doesn't help rankings.
He might as well have pulled out a pistol and shot it in the head.
Without that lever G+ is done.
At some point they were innovating.
Google is not offering anything new, and they are not going to succeed until they do, unless they invest for the long term. In 20 years who knows what will be the big thing? Google can fund 20 years easily.
But I dont see it being anything but a wannabe for the next half decade or so. Matt Cutts has come tight iout and said it doesn't help rankings.
He might as well have pulled out a pistol and shot it in the head.
Without that lever G+ is done.
- Sep 30, 2012
- 1,617
- 1,313
I agree with all of you that say G+ got nothing to offer, thing is, they have the power.
People hate it now, sure thing. But they are forcing more and more businesses/people to start using it.
You know, when you get used to something, you will simply keep using it even if you were not too fond of it at the beginning. Give it some months, and people will start to like it...
Brute force works, and it works best when its done "unconsciously" as well as actively.
I don't like Gs aim of world domination, but hey, if you can't fight them you might as well join forces with them (I believe this is what G+ haters will end up saying).
I like twitter but there are a lot of spammers tho