SEO Tools Comparison (SEnuke X, Xrumer, SBox, AMR, BF SEO, BMD, Sick S..,Magic Submitter)
- Thread starter JasonS
- Start date
invisibledash
Newbie
- Dec 8, 2012
- 19
- 8
Wow nice but they are too expensive and i am scared of negtive seo
JasonS
Elite Member
- Sep 15, 2012
- 6,007
- 2,881
He said he has used all the programs and then generated this chart, and this chart is related to softwares feature.
JasonS
Elite Member
- Sep 15, 2012
- 6,007
- 2,881
If you know how to use them properly with solid strategy then you no need to worry about penguin/panda or any updates.
LinkContractor
Registered Member
- Mar 24, 2012
- 92
- 27
Credits goes to "faisalmaximus" on WF
Obviously, biased toward SeNuke!
I'd go with SeNuke or Ultimate Demon... My personal pick is UD (SN is too expensive for my taste) ^.^
myownhero
Power Member
- Mar 13, 2012
- 790
- 749
Despite what that picture says, SEnuke has no built in OCR (it was removed some time ago and really sucked even when it was in).
And you know this is a stupid comparison because things like scraping settings (which is the reason most people buy SB/XR) aren't compared.
It also says SEnuke can't check PageRank when technically it can. I don't get why they'd choose to compare whether or not software can check PR but not whether or not it can scrape sites...
And you know this is a stupid comparison because things like scraping settings (which is the reason most people buy SB/XR) aren't compared.
It also says SEnuke can't check PageRank when technically it can. I don't get why they'd choose to compare whether or not software can check PR but not whether or not it can scrape sites...
dotcomdesigns
Power Member
- May 16, 2009
- 673
- 655
and conveniently omits Ultimate Demon but includes Bookmarking Demon instead.
mrtornado
Power Member
- Dec 16, 2008
- 509
- 540
They just upgraded x-rumer you should take another look at it
Amd ye guys like I've told you before this pictures is just what the picture taker wants. You can't never compare x-rumer with senuke, or scrapebox with senuke, scrapebox is for something else, and x-rumer if you know how to use it it can do a lot of stuff.
- Jan 25, 2009
- 6,378
- 3,774
seems nice at a glance, but the xrumer price is wrong, its $650 + 10 a month now, sbox is clearly available for $57.
Xrumer has X on things it does, sbox does too, focus of scrapebox is completely wrong.
Ill not go into more details, as just looking at this sheet at a glance its easy to see that the derringer entered into it with presumptions and looked at the data and made it fit their presumptions.
If you were to unbiasedly look at all the data for each, which would take a LOT of research, then you could construct a sheet that listed a lot more elements and creative options. The sheet assumes that all users of the program want to follow are particular path and accomplish a particular element with a given tool. Then it uses significantly limited info to construct the sheet.
That said, if you look at tools as a whole, and realize most if not all tools can creatively be used largely or exponentially beyond what the "general blackhat public" might think of them as, then you can realize that the power of the tool has not all that much to do with the tool and with the user.
A tool is only as good as its user and this sheet shows that either someone was biased or was limited in their thinking of how you can use such tools.
Good concept, just it was only executed "ok", not awesomely.
Xrumer has X on things it does, sbox does too, focus of scrapebox is completely wrong.
Ill not go into more details, as just looking at this sheet at a glance its easy to see that the derringer entered into it with presumptions and looked at the data and made it fit their presumptions.
If you were to unbiasedly look at all the data for each, which would take a LOT of research, then you could construct a sheet that listed a lot more elements and creative options. The sheet assumes that all users of the program want to follow are particular path and accomplish a particular element with a given tool. Then it uses significantly limited info to construct the sheet.
That said, if you look at tools as a whole, and realize most if not all tools can creatively be used largely or exponentially beyond what the "general blackhat public" might think of them as, then you can realize that the power of the tool has not all that much to do with the tool and with the user.
A tool is only as good as its user and this sheet shows that either someone was biased or was limited in their thinking of how you can use such tools.
Good concept, just it was only executed "ok", not awesomely.
0_00_0
Senior Member
- Oct 7, 2010
- 1,027
- 494
This is a decent list for beginners but there are definitely some features missing. SeNuke can definitely check page rank but it does not have OCR anymore (it was horrible anyways). This chart makes Scrapebox look useless .
I didn't think magic submitter had that many features it looks pretty good. I have SENuke lifetime license though so I'm happy.
I think they could have used a few more rows ie. Blog posting.
.I didn't think magic submitter had that many features it looks pretty good. I have SENuke lifetime license though so I'm happy
. I think they could have used a few more rows ie. Blog posting.
stevejohns
Junior Member
- Sep 5, 2011
- 107
- 34
'Tis the season of noob rippers!
Just in case anyone wondered why the chart is biased towards Senuke,
lol! no doubt being bias.
and xrumer just increased their price this year.
I'd rather go with zenno + xrumer + gsa
mrtornado
Power Member
- Dec 16, 2008
- 509
- 540