Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter Sweetfunny
- Start date
- Status
- Jan 25, 2009
- 6,378
- 3,774
You need to contact support directly.
http://www.scrapebox.com/contact-us
Choose licensing from the drop down.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=scrapebox+rapid+indexer+list+2012
Also you can try the search button at the top of this page.
Go to settings >> use multi threaded harvester - and uncheck this. Then try and harvest, there will be a status column. What errors are you getting in the status column?
Here is a video that goes over how to do this and other troubleshooting for the harvester that might be helpful. http://youtu.be/2QaLWgTXsRo
Mex-deluxe
Regular Member
- May 24, 2010
- 254
- 31
I googled this, but didn't find a definitive solution. I harvest using about 250000 keywords, after like 700000 harvested URLs I get this error:
Access violation at address xxxxxxx in module 'scrapebox.exe'. Read of address 00000008.
then Scrapebox crashes.
I use 100 private proxies with 20 connections (multi-threaded harvester). My VPS runs Windows Server 2008 with 2GB RAM and 2.26 GHz quad core CPU. I only run Scrapebox, so it should have enough RAM and CPU. I also have free disk space. Using the latest Scrapebox.
By the way how can I resume the harvesting session after a crash? I see the harvester sessions folder, but how can I resume the harvesting (using only those keywords which left)? If I hit the Harvest button again, it will start over.
Access violation at address xxxxxxx in module 'scrapebox.exe'. Read of address 00000008.
then Scrapebox crashes.
I use 100 private proxies with 20 connections (multi-threaded harvester). My VPS runs Windows Server 2008 with 2GB RAM and 2.26 GHz quad core CPU. I only run Scrapebox, so it should have enough RAM and CPU. I also have free disk space. Using the latest Scrapebox.
By the way how can I resume the harvesting session after a crash? I see the harvester sessions folder, but how can I resume the harvesting (using only those keywords which left)? If I hit the Harvest button again, it will start over.
Last edited:
Mex-deluxe
Regular Member
- May 24, 2010
- 254
- 31
I had not enough memory (RAM), that was the problem. Didn't know that 2GB RAM is not enough for 20 threads.
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,110
- 26,629
best you can do is contact scrapebox support
worse they can say is no
you loose nothing by trying
alaltaierii
Supreme Member
- Jun 11, 2010
- 1,494
- 388
Update your scrapebox to the last version.
I'm using 1.15.59 and bing indexer it's working fine for me.
I always update my Scrapebox.
According to Scrapebox that "made up" url is indexed in Bing.
When checking manually its not even listed.
Anyone else using the OBL checker? I have to use that quite often and it makes it hell to use. First of all, it memory leaks. The process grows in memory by about 100 megs for each 1500 checked links. You need a gig and a half of spare memory if your list is 10k URLs long. If you have to check 2 million URLs, then all you can do is split that into 10k lists and run these one at a time. That's the only way I find is working for me. Imagine the time spent on this task. Anyone here doing it more effectively?
Another thing is, whether I set it to 25 connections or at 80, it spits out entire blocks or Timeout-ed URLs. Probably a sixth of all the URLs will get a timeout and these have to be repeated. Another time waster. I need to add here that for instance I don't get any timeouts in the Blog Analyzer or other addons that I use. It's only the OBL checker that has a problem. It seems to me like it's buggy and for some reason it was overlooked for a long time from getting an update
Another thing is, whether I set it to 25 connections or at 80, it spits out entire blocks or Timeout-ed URLs. Probably a sixth of all the URLs will get a timeout and these have to be repeated. Another time waster. I need to add here that for instance I don't get any timeouts in the Blog Analyzer or other addons that I use. It's only the OBL checker that has a problem. It seems to me like it's buggy and for some reason it was overlooked for a long time from getting an update
Last edited:
- Jan 25, 2009
- 6,378
- 3,774
Most generally when there is an access violation its that some outside program is interacting with scrapebox and causing it to crash. 1 instance of scrapebox is going to be fine on 2GB of ram, "probably". Windows probably sucks 500-800MB of memory and whats left is about 1.5-1.3GB of memory and thats pretty decent. SB can cap at 1.8 being a 32 bit app, but your in a good range.
Things like firewalls, anti-virus, sandboxie etc... and other programs can hook the process or mess with the sockets etc... and cause SB to crash. Try killing everythign except core windows processes and services and and/or just shut them down one by one till you find the culprit. Add allow rules in security programs.
I always update my Scrapebox.
According to Scrapebox that "made up" url is indexed in Bing.
When checking manually its not even listed.
Im not completely sure how SB reads the data in the response from bing, but I grabbed the response code and sent it along with the issue to the developer. Same thing happens to me in .59. Im sure they will fix it up.
I don't use it much, but you have to remember that everythign it does, it does in memory. So as it goes along, its holding all prior data, along with loading what could be Massive pages and then trying to read them, and extrapolate data, all in memory in real time. So if you load in 10K 10MB blog engine pages, imagine trying to load those, grab data, store data and continue to load.
Are you loading in randomized lists? IF you are not then its trying to load a bunch of urls from the same domain at once, which could cause the end server to ignore your request as it things your hammering, and/or it could just be to slow to respond. Also if you hit a site that has a fast enough server but hit a ton of large pages, your internet connection and/or DNS might not be able to resolve/load the pages in the timeout allotment.
Id say its not got an update because its fairly straight forward and likely wouldn't need updates. When I have used it, it seems to work fine for me.
- Nov 2, 2008
- 59,110
- 26,629
hay loopline you seriously need to have a wiki page called
wiki scrapebox mat or something - the stuff you no is of the
charts , i was gonna be humerus and call it
scrape mats box - but thats sounds creepy :cow_yello
wiki scrapebox mat or something - the stuff you no is of the
charts , i was gonna be humerus and call it
scrape mats box - but thats sounds creepy :cow_yello
Last edited:
I'm using very randomized lists when I do OBL checks. The point is, while you can run a 250k-long list in the Blog Analyzer, you can't do so with the OBL checker. Yes, it does work while it works, up until it fills up all memory and crashes, which is sure to happen, as it fills the memory at a fast rate. You'd have a hard time checking lists larger than 10k. It does seem indeed that it holds all the parsed pages in the active memory, but how practical is that? Anything Scrapebox that doesn't allow for the use of large lists defeats the purpose of this software.
I'm stumbling against the limitations of the OBL checker again and again and have a real problem with it. I offer a low OBL commenting service and I'm spending days on end running my lists thru the OBL checker.
I'm stumbling against the limitations of the OBL checker again and again and have a real problem with it. I offer a low OBL commenting service and I'm spending days on end running my lists thru the OBL checker.
I would like to post small update suggestion - in Options->Setup Email Notification Servers doesn't have option to receive notification for completed trackbacks and I'm sure that many scrapebox customers will be happy if this option exist.That would be awesome.
pisco
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2010
- 223
- 44
A quick question for you all, i know there is the option to "automatically remove duplicate domains", but is there an option to automatically remove duplicate URLS ? That would be very usefull, because on major harvesting it's not that hard to go past 1 milion results limit, but in the end removing the duplicates we only get around 20% of that (assuming the keywords were scraped from the same mother KW), so if SB just removed the dup url automatically it would be much harder to reach that limit.
ssd1234
Junior Member
- Nov 22, 2011
- 152
- 68
I dont think there is but you can buy the SB Automator plugin. There you can do it automatically
pisco
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2010
- 223
- 44
I'm not sure the automator will help my issue, if it only "tells" SB to remove duplicate URL after the harvest ends, then it will still crash when i get results above 1million.
I've been looking into the sales site for the Automator, but is anywhere i can find more extended documentation (maybe from someone who bought it?) to clear if it solves the issue or not ?
I've been looking into the sales site for the Automator, but is anywhere i can find more extended documentation (maybe from someone who bought it?) to clear if it solves the issue or not ?
- Jan 25, 2009
- 6,378
- 3,774
Haha.
I dump a lot of my knowledge on
http://www.scrapeboxfaq.com
and
http://www.scrapestuff.com
You can install it on only 1 pc per a license. So if you wanted to use it on both machines you would need 2 licenses. You can transfer it 1 time per month for free. Meaning move it to a new machine. Also you can purchase a 2nd license for a discounted price of $45
The grid that is used in the urls harvested section is a Microsoft grid and it limits to 1 million lines. However when harvesting you can harvest an unlimited number of ulrs. 1 million are stored in the grid but all the urls are stored in the harvester sessions folder. I have harvested 180 million urls in 1 run and I routinely harvest multiple millions of urls.
Then you can use the dupe remove addon mass dupe remove urls, up to 180 million ish.
There is NO such thing as a 1 million limit.
You can virtually scrape and unlimited amount of ulrs. Urls are stored in 1 million chunks in the following folder: Scrapebox Folder>> Harvester Sessions >> Harvester_ XXX_XXX
Each session creates a new folder. You may want to delete these from time to time.
src: http://scrapeboxfaq.com/can-i-scrape-more-then-1-million-ulrs-at-a-time
But Im not sure what your issue is. Are you trying to say your scrapebox physically crashes and closes down when you harvest more then 1 million urls? Because there is no limit.
The short answer is that the automator doesn't change how scrapebox works at all, it just "automates" it. Everything is still done in scrapebox.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
New Automator Plugin:
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status