MASSIVE list of link building techniques! (15 Easy Post-Penguin Link Building Methods)

Do you submit the same press release to the multiple pr site?
 
Do you submit the same press release to the multiple pr site?

I usually change some things around every time I submit to a new PR site. I manually change some wording, sentence order... I don't spin my press releases, because It is perfectly natural to have a duplicate press release, but I do make some minor changes every time I submit to a new site.
 
Excellent post, i've been using paid press release sites recently and hitting number 1 quite often with a number of keywords just by using press releases alone.
 
Just checked out Tynt and it looks pretty cool. Signing up now!
 
Good post and well explained.

One question I have when using Web 2.0. type sites to increase ranking and (hopefully) drive traffic to your main money site what sort of content do you put on your Web 2.0. sites? Just rehashed stuff from the main site? Obviously re-writing new content would take an age for all these different web 2.0s.
 
Good post and well explained.

One question I have when using Web 2.0. type sites to increase ranking and (hopefully) drive traffic to your main money site what sort of content do you put on your Web 2.0. sites? Just rehashed stuff from the main site? Obviously re-writing new content would take an age for all these different web 2.0s.

I usually fill them with about 1000 words and a few pictures. I use lots of header tags, and make it easily readable. I don't usually use spun content, but i manually re-word product descriptions and sales pitches for my money site. Re-writing doesn't take as long as you would think.

Honestly... I just keep thinking type as fast as I can. Its web 2.0's, it doesn't have to my incredibly high quality. You can pay any of your friends $10/hour and tell them you need 2000 words per hour for re-written content. Its a reasonable expectation and it works.
 
why don't u use solo ads or safe swaps,are they unreliable and no use to link building?
 
Really good post. I even printed it out which is high praise indeed - its just so good to have an overview. Going 'manual' isnt that hard though of course if youve got dozens of sites...but I have a question which I just cant seem to get right in my head (a massive hangover doesnt help).

Web 2.0 for SEO for ONE main website. Do you create them as satellite sites, so, for example if you sell bikes you do a blog about mountain bikes which has good unique content but is clearly linked to you (eg it showcases your mountain bikes) OR do you have to pretend its a totally separate thing & do general content with links out all over the place?

Can you get away with linking to your articles (on article sites), press releases etc? And what about Squidoo lenses, Hubpages etc? At the moment mine are clearly mine (user name is my website name) showing my products, but with good unique content & some links to suppliers, articles etc as well as links to my products. Im clear that its another way to reach customers but will it help my SEO?

If anyone can definitively answer this I will tweet, like, link to & vote for whatever you want (except meds/porn/gambling). Seriously, its doing my head in. :D
 
I usually change some things around every time I submit to a new PR site. I manually change some wording, sentence order... I don't spin my press releases, because It is perfectly natural to have a duplicate press release, but I do make some minor changes every time I submit to a new site.

I don't think there is any need to do this. I have never changed a press release to make it unique among sites. Even if your just changing a few things. Companies pay thousands of dollars to push out a press release. If they were being punished by Google for same content no one would ever do a legit press release.


To be clear, I am not saying that Xrumer and Scrapebox don't work... they do. But now you need more Tiers, more buffers, and more trust to get the same rankings.

Good advice. I use scrapebox to look for fresh blog post made within the last 24 hours or so and post then we have someone that manually post to them.

We use used to use Nuke and switched to magic submitter for promoting our tier 1 and 2 sites. Never our money sites.

Great post. Rep given.
 
PartyNeon - this is awesome and helpful post. Much appreciate that and rep given. I could PM you with some fiver gigs from my collection, which you could include in your fiver case study. Also they could be useful for everyone. Just let me know and I'll PM you :)

Cheers
Petko
 
Nice post, especially on the warnings to keep in mind. Does anyone have a method to create 3-tier backlinks for a site and ensuring that you don't get sandboxed? I'm looking for the actual method.
 
PartyNeon - this is awesome and helpful post. Much appreciate that and rep given. I could PM you with some fiver gigs from my collection, which you could include in your fiver case study
Petko

Of course! Send me some of your info. I'll share some of my current data and tips that I use too. PM Me
 
This is really cool list you got there. I am using a few of them now, will add a few others soon too.
 
Web 2.0 for SEO for ONE main website. Do you create them as satellite sites, so, for example if you sell bikes you do a blog about mountain bikes which has good unique content but is clearly linked to you (eg it showcases your mountain bikes) OR do you have to pretend its a totally separate thing & do general content with links out all over the place?

Can you get away with linking to your articles (on article sites), press releases etc? And what about Squidoo lenses, Hubpages etc? At the moment mine are clearly mine (user name is my website name) showing my products, but with good unique content & some links to suppliers, articles etc as well as links to my products. Im clear that its another way to reach customers but will it help my SEO?

If anyone can definitively answer this I will tweet, like, link to & vote for whatever you want (except meds/porn/gambling). Seriously, its doing my head in

Yeah I'd like to know the answer to this too. It's something I'm not sure on just yet.
 
Really good post. I even printed it out which is high praise indeed - its just so good to have an overview. Going 'manual' isnt that hard though of course if youve got dozens of sites...but I have a question which I just cant seem to get right in my head (a massive hangover doesnt help).

Web 2.0 for SEO for ONE main website. Do you create them as satellite sites, so, for example if you sell bikes you do a blog about mountain bikes which has good unique content but is clearly linked to you (eg it showcases your mountain bikes) OR do you have to pretend its a totally separate thing & do general content with links out all over the place?

Can you get away with linking to your articles (on article sites), press releases etc? And what about Squidoo lenses, Hubpages etc? At the moment mine are clearly mine (user name is my website name) showing my products, but with good unique content & some links to suppliers, articles etc as well as links to my products. Im clear that its another way to reach customers but will it help my SEO?

If anyone can definitively answer this I will tweet, like, link to & vote for whatever you want (except meds/porn/gambling). Seriously, its doing my head in. :D

Using Web 2.0's for one main website is fine. I do a 50/50 split of satellites and more natural looking pages. In reality, I honestly do not think that it matters very much, as long as you have enough unique content to make the page authoritative. I'll usually link the pages to another web 2.0 on the same domain (even if it is not my own page) Linking to the same domain won't drastically dilute the outbound link value, but it still makes the page look like a natural web 2.0.

You ABSOLUTELY can get away with linking to your articles, that is the best way to link. Most natural links are pointed to deep pages! This is definitely the way to go. (Don't completely eliminate your homepage though.)

I would pick a different username, thats an easy footprint.

Rather than make web 2.0's, spend $30, buy a few domains, and post content on satellite domains. This will ultimately pass more value than the lenses and hubpages.
 
Using Web 2.0's for one main website is fine. I do a 50/50 split of satellites and more natural looking pages. In reality, I honestly do not think that it matters very much, as long as you have enough unique content to make the page authoritative. I'll usually link the pages to another web 2.0 on the same domain (even if it is not my own page) Linking to the same domain won't drastically dilute the outbound link value, but it still makes the page look like a natural web 2.0.

You ABSOLUTELY can get away with linking to your articles, that is the best way to link. Most natural links are pointed to deep pages! This is definitely the way to go. (Don't completely eliminate your homepage though.)

I would pick a different username, thats an easy footprint.

Rather than make web 2.0's, spend $30, buy a few domains, and post content on satellite domains. This will ultimately pass more value than the lenses and hubpages.

It must take so much time to build and update all these different satellite sites and 2.0s etc, no?

I'll usually link the pages to another web 2.0 on the same domain (even if it is not my own page) Linking to the same domain won't drastically dilute the outbound link value, but it still makes the page look like a natural web 2.0.

I don't get this. You're linking to another page that doesn't belong to you, why?
 
Would like to get back into buying links again but anyone have ideas that have worked best for them?
 
OH yeah and be CAREFUL buying links from just anywhere. I had companies that I trusted buying me links and they worked but then Penguin hit and it hit hard so QUALITY is key
 
Search for LinkBombReport...
it is one very old document that is still bible for link building
 
Back
Top