Did you hear about this Google secret?

[MarkusAllen]

Mister choudahary, please don't tell me you are running out of fresh meat on WF... you forgot to add the wso jargon sales page to your first post.

Oh wait... you need to have more posts to include a link.

Why don't you go spam other threads with your toll booth link mantra so you can post your 4k word sales page on here.

Oh wait...

​

I'm trying to figure out why you think I'm Gauher.

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

Folks, Once a post called a "Google Secret" gets posted here it is no longer a secret... actually it never was.

 

[Serp_Pimp]

I will refer to you as guather because you are his puppet.

You have had an account here since 2009, your last post besides this thread was two other posts promoting gauther's product and before that, the last posts were from 2010.

Please Pinocchio, WF is that way ---->

 

[Crewchief007]

Is this the same Marcus Allen that made that sweet run is Super Bowl XVIII?

Congrats dude, that was one heck of a cutback. Needless to say, the Raider Nation will always pay homage to you.

I had no idea you were into IM; it's a small world, right?

 

[MarkusAllen]

I will refer to you as guather because you are his puppet.

You have had an account here since 2009, your last post besides this thread was two other posts promoting gauther's product and before that, the last posts were from 2010.

Please Pinocchio, WF is that way ---->

Trust me, I find the Warrior Forum repugnant.

I'm not promoting Gaeher's software. It is mine. And my post was over 4,000 words with 259 words reserved for those who wanted an automated way to handle a private ad network.

And if you checked, you'll see that I've got 29 posts here since 2009. But for some reason, they're not showing up (and or were deleted).

For example, I posted this comment in a thread titled, "Own list of high pr sites, edu sites, quick backlinks" - here's what I wrote:

Anybody know a site that can quickly ping a huge list?

Yes, pingler.com

Does pingler allow you to make multiple url pings?

Ah. I see where you're going with that. I don't think so.


You probably don't want that anyway... look into "link velocity."

With that said, are you saying you'd rather I not post here?

Just say the word and you've got it.

 

[meathead1234]

Trust me, I find the Warrior Forum repugnant.

With that said, are you saying you'd rather I not post here?

Just say the word and you've got it.

I'm sure you know your stuff (to some extent) but when your only contributions are self-promotional you're going to run into a lot of criticism, especially when you use terms like "secret blog" and "inner circle" - it just reads like a sales letter. Google's smart pricing isn't a "secret", they post it publicly on their blog (yes - some people are too stupid to know about it, but that's life).

Why don't you try contributing without the ulterior motive and without the WF-esque language? Once people get to know you, there won't be as many issues with the occasional bit of self-promo.

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

Trust me, I find the Warrior Forum repugnant.

With that said, are you saying you'd rather I not post here?

Just say the word and you've got it.

29 posts since 2009... not sure it even matters if you post or not here... clearly you are not contributing.

 

[MarkusAllen]

29 posts since 2009... not sure it even matters if you post or not here... clearly you are not contributing.

As I said in the post above... I have posted here many times... always giving value.

I can understand why you'd be concerned as there's either a glitch or something with looking at posts from back in time (see above).

Again, if you think 259 words out of 4,000 is a bad thing, I'm out. Just say the word.

 

[meathead1234]

As I said in the post above... I have posted here many times... always giving value.

I can understand why you'd be concerned as there's either a glitch or something with looking at posts from back in time (see above).

Again, if you think 259 words out of 4,000 is a bad thing, I'm out. Just say the word.

Actually, quite a few of your past posts have been promotional.

I'm curious, though, so I have a question. The software you are creating is relatively basic. What on earth do you need $30k for? If you say programmers/testing, I know you are full of shit. Something like that would cost $10k, max. And that would be if you went with expensive US based programmers. And if you think it's such a great idea, why not fund it yourself and keep all the profits.

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

As I said in the post above... I have posted here many times... always giving value.

I can understand why you'd be concerned as there's either a glitch or something with looking at posts from back in time (see above).

Again, if you think 259 words out of 4,000 is a bad thing, I'm out. Just say the word.

I wouldn't say the word as that is out of turn.

I'm not concerned either but I am clearly not impressed... you called out one respondent and you stated that you have 29 posts since 2009... that is really not being a contributing member but a guy that pops in from time to time.

Nothing wrong with that at all but you can't espouse as being a contributing member (laud and applaud yourself) with an average of 10 posts a year.

Just my opinion.

 

[MarkusAllen]

Actually, quite a few of your past posts have been promotional.

I'm curious, though, so I have a question. The software you are creating is relatively basic. What on earth do you need $30k for? If you say programmers/testing, I know you are full of shit. Something like that would cost $10k, max. And that would be if you went with expensive US based programmers. And if you think it's such a great idea, why not fund it yourself and keep all the profits.

That's cool that you think I'm full of shit.

But now I'm gunshy about talking about my solution... because now you'll just call me a spammer.

Here's what I recommend you do - don't invest in my project.

I'm not saying this to be smart... I'm saying continue using Google to monetize your site, and I'll use my software to monetize my content.

Let's revisit this post exactly a year from now and trade notes. Let's see who is "winning."

I'm willing to make a friendly bet that exactly a year from now, Google will have banned almost 90+% of all AdSense accounts (probably 99.99% actuallY) - and will still continue to frustrate everyone (except authority site owners) with their infamous no-comment bullshit.

Site owners will be screaming 100 times worse than they are now. I'll take that bet all day long. You ain't seen nothin' yet.

I left the beginnings of a blueprint in that post I made... the tip about poaching advertisers from EzineArticles.com's search results is huge. Very few people I've talked to even thought about doing that.

I suggest you go out and spend your $10,000 and get a fantastic programmer to do it for you and that way you get to keep 100%. Seriously. Try it. Tell me how that works out for you.

Deal? Can we meet up again this time next year?

By the way, I AM funding it myself and keeping all of the profits. Did you think I made up the funding number out of thin air? It's the total amount (minus the $750 to finish coding the software) I've invested on this project since I came up with the idea back in 2010. And by the way, I've used coders that cost be $1,000 an hour (an Israeli guy who was the only person on the planet that could figure out the AI I needed for this) to my regular guy in Bulgaria that probably charges $3 a hour (I always pay per project, not per hour - so I'm guessing). I've got another guy from India working on it, too. And tonight I'm having another programmer work on another module.

If you think creating software that automatically poaches advertisers and converts them to private ads sponsors is relatively basic, you're just dead wrong about that. Dead wrong.

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

That's cool that you think I'm full of shit.

But now I'm gunshy about talking about my solution... because now you'll just call me a spammer.

Here's what I recommend you do - don't invest in my project.

I'm not saying this to be smart... I'm saying continue using Google to monetize your site, and I'll use my software to monetize my content.

Let's revisit this post exactly a year from now and trade notes. Let's see who is "winning."

I'm willing to make a friendly bet that exactly a year from now, Google will have banned almost 90+% of all AdSense accounts (probably 99.99% actuallY) - and will still continue to frustrate everyone (except authority site owners) with their infamous no-comment bullshit.

Site owners will be screaming 100 times worse than they are now. I'll take that bet all day long. You ain't seen nothin' yet.

I left the beginnings of a blueprint in that post I made... the tip about poaching advertisers from EzineArticles.com's search results is huge. Very few people I've talked to even thought about doing that.

I suggest you go out and spend your $10,000 and get a fantastic programmer to do it for you and that way you get to keep 100%. Seriously. Try it. Tell me how that works out for you.

Deal? Can we meet up again this time next year?

By the way, I AM funding it myself and keeping all of the profits. Did you think I made up the funding number out of thin air? It's the total amount (minus the $750 to finish coding the software) I've invested on this project since I came up with the idea back in 2010. And by the way, I've used coders that cost be $1,000 an hour (an Israeli guy who was the only person on the planet that could figure out the AI I needed for this) to my regular guy in Bulgaria that probably charges $3 a hour (I always pay per project, not per hour - so I'm guessing). I've got another guy from India working on it, too. And tonight I'm having another programmer work on another module.

If you think creating software that automatically poaches advertisers and converts them to private ads sponsors is relatively basic, you're just dead wrong about that. Dead wrong.

I almost never say this but not responding would be improper.

You're a dick and a schill... neither one is something to aspire to... thought I'd toss that in since it appears that is your goal in this forum.

 

[Serp_Pimp]

I apologize if I came off as being harsh earlier.

But listen, if you are going to promote something then please play by the rules.

Become a donor and open up a bst, no need to act sneaky.

 

[meathead1234]

That's cool that you think I'm full of shit.

But now I'm gunshy about talking about my solution... because now you'll just call me a spammer.

Here's what I recommend you do - don't invest in my project.

I'm not saying this to be smart... I'm saying continue using Google to monetize your site, and I'll use my software to monetize my content.

Let's revisit this post exactly a year from now and trade notes. Let's see who is "winning."

I'm willing to make a friendly bet that exactly a year from now, Google will have banned almost 90+% of all AdSense accounts (probably 99.99% actuallY) - and will still continue to frustrate everyone (except authority site owners) with their infamous no-comment bullshit.

Site owners will be screaming 100 times worse than they are now. I'll take that bet all day long. You ain't seen nothin' yet.

I left the beginnings of a blueprint in that post I made... the tip about poaching advertisers from EzineArticles.com's search results is huge. Very few people I've talked to even thought about doing that.

I suggest you go out and spend your $10,000 and get a fantastic programmer to do it for you and that way you get to keep 100%. Seriously. Try it. Tell me how that works out for you.

Deal? Can we meet up again this time next year?

By the way, I AM funding it myself and keeping all of the profits. Did you think I made up the funding number out of thin air? It's the total amount (minus the $750 to finish coding the software) I've invested on this project since I came up with the idea back in 2010. And by the way, I've used coders that cost be $1,000 an hour (an Israeli guy who was the only person on the planet that could figure out the AI I needed for this) to my regular guy in Bulgaria that probably charges $3 a hour (I always pay per project, not per hour - so I'm guessing). I've got another guy from India working on it, too. And tonight I'm having another programmer work on another module.

If you think creating software that automatically poaches advertisers and converts them to private ads sponsors is relatively basic, you're just dead wrong about that. Dead wrong.

Woah, talk about defensive.

I was genuinely interested. I actually agree with you that Adsense is a waste of time, I don't even have an account with them and make a fair % of my revenue through selling direct ads, so I do actually like the concept. I guarantee I speak to more site owners on a daily basis than you do as well, so I would actually be your perfect investor. No need to be a patronising smart-ass.

You're willing to bet Google is going to ban 99.99% of Adsense accounts this year? That's naive at best. I'm assuming you realise that Google relies on publishers to generate the majority of their multi-billion dollar revenues.

I still can't see how it could cost $30k to build. I have a number of programmers on my books full time and have created a number of software products, and I could have three of them work for a year for $30k (and they are pretty good). Surely there isn't *that* much work?

The fact you have gone super defensive on me implies that your "crowd-funding" front is exactly what I thought it was... a way to make some early sales. If it really was crowd-funding, your investors would be getting equity, not just a free trial when it's launched. It's a smart idea, but so far I've just found you to be patronising and rude so I'll remember not to recommend you to my clients.

 

[MarkusAllen]

Woah, talk about defensive.
You're willing to bet Google is going to ban 99.99% of Adsense accounts this year? That's naive at best. I'm assuming you realise that Google relies on publishers to generate the majority of their multi-billion dollar revenues.

I live and breathe news about Google AdSense.

Because I've been working on my AdSense alternative software for years.

When Google says, "don't be evil"... they're laughing at us. Because they are the epitome of evil.

Google says do this... and the sheep follow to get fleeced.

Laughing. Google is laughing at us.

Speaking of Google - Google this:
To Pat, From Google Adsense: About Your Account...

It's about how Pat Flynn (and his authority site) got banned. The post is just 12 hours old from today.

If Pay Flynn gets banned, we're all goin' down this year.

I'm authoring another massive post detailing how Google and their "quality mantra" is a whopper of a lie. Publishing quality content (at least the way Google suggests) is a surefire way to online banktuptcy.

I'd post a link to my article (which will link to my software), but obviously that doesn't work here - so I won't.

So here's a hint: Google this phrase:
google GYBO

GYBO is going to make Google AdSense irrelevant by this time next year. Put money on it. I am.

Getting your site organically listed on the first page of Google will become almost impossible two years from now (maybe sooner).

I could go on and on.

 

[Makunouchi]

LAWLZ SEO IS DEAD DUDES
Well, there's no such a secret, because you have outed it brawh.
The fact that you "breathe" Google news does not mean you know what will happen. Do you have solid and irrefutable proofs of what you're saying? I bet you don't. All you say are mere speculations and hearsays. If you really knew what will happen then why in the world would you reveal it in a forum? I mean, you could be potentially millionaire keeping your mouth closed.

It's nothing personal, nor I'm trying to troll you. It's just that many people think they have found the holly grial of the interwebz.
Cheers.

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

I'd post a link to my article (which will link to my software), but obviously that doesn't work here - so I won't.

So here's a hint: Google this phrase:
google GYBO

So you did the next best thing.

Getting your site organically listed on the first page of Google will become almost impossible two years from now (maybe sooner).

For some it always be... for those of us that have been adapting for years it will never be.

 

[meathead1234]

I already agreed with you about Google. I don't like Adsense, nor do I like sites that rely too heavily on Google for traffic. I don't know why you keep trying to sell this notion to me. All I'm saying is that "99.99%" is way too high. Just because a few well known MMO "gurus" have been banned, doesn't mean the whole world will be.

For someone who "breathes" everything Google, you're not a very good reader. Pat wasn't banned, he just got a warning. Did you even read his blog post?

No-one has any issues with the knowledge you seem to have, it's just the self-promotional and patronising way you communicate.

 

[MarkusAllen]

I already agreed with you about Google. I don't like Adsense, nor do I like sites that rely too heavily on Google for traffic. I don't know why you keep trying to sell this notion to me. All I'm saying is that "99.99%" is way too high. Just because a few well known MMO "gurus" have been banned, doesn't mean the whole world will be.

For someone who "breathes" everything Google, you're not a very good reader. Pat wasn't banned, he just got a warning. Did you even read his blog post?

No-one has any issues with the knowledge you seem to have, it's just the self-promotional and patronising way you communicate.

My bad... you're right. He got a rare warning letter with a 72-hour notice. I say rare because everyone else gets a nonspecific whack letter about the potential for invalid clicks (or some other vague reason).

I was actually thinking of Spencer Haws when I was typing... mixed the two up. Spencer got banned. You should Google his situation - blew me away, actually.

Again, my mistake. Pat Flynn was warned. Spencer Haws was banned by AdSense.

Question is, will Pat be banned 72 hours later? Time will tell.

Night!

 

[Crewchief007]

I see the problem!

I live and breathe news about Google AdSense...

Markus, it appears as though you greatly underestimated what BHW is all about and the level of expertise, knowledge and SEO acumen that resides at this Internet address.

You may also not realize this but there are a ton of heavy hitters on BHW. They don't toot their own horns or engage in other forms of incessant self-promotion. They don't have to because their volume of work speaks for itself.

That being said, what you shared is no secret to anyone on BHW and some just may take it as an insult that anyone would even dare attempt to sell BHW on the idea that your 4000 word missive is some sort of a secret or new revelation.

Maybe if you had utilized the BHW search feature and looked for some of the threads about Matt Cutts, Adsense, the google slap, the google dance and Adense ban hammer and etc., you would have figure out that the BHW family knows what Google is doing and we are not impressed, scared, intimated, jittery or weary of their game plan.

Sure, some individuals abandoned ship after the Panda and Penguin fallout but that number is pale in comparison to the number of individuals who hunkered down, regrouped and came out swinging!

And P.S., no one is suggesting that you refrain from becoming a contributing member of BHW; that was your idea. What we are saying is, if you claim you are sharing a secret, it better be a genuine bona fide certifiable secret!!!!