Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[drogon]

The tool was released 2 days ago so whatever difference there is you can't clearly say that it resulted from the content.

I know that, just based on how he wrote his comments i got the impression he had be using it a bit longer....ie got a copy prior to release.

 

[SEO20]

When you run the software it will randomly alter these stopwords so it will still looks the same to you and I - but all search-engines, software and computer programs will see something completely different and unique.
No strange HTML-codes or anything like that. All text will be clear and plain text.

May sounds a little akward or noobisch, but I really cant see the differance in articles before and after use of this software.

Even in plain text I cant get my head around the fact that it is unique to search engines, it plain text.

Please explain to me how search engines will see articles as uniques while they are the same to the human eye, in a txt file. No coding is used in plain txt so what is the REAL differance?

Sorry for these questions but I find it hard to believe that google will think these articles are unique, while they LOOK the same in plain txt file.

Can you explain further on the concept of the stopwords? or give an example article so we can see that's going on behind the scenes of this software.

And if I want to sell articles, I don't think customers like a plain txt file with a bounche of coding in it.

 

[xxtoni]

I bought the software yesterday, haven't done a lot of testing with it, seems very straightforward you copy the text into the tool, the output looks identical to the naked eye but CopyScape and the TheBestSpinner duplicate checker, which is much more precise than Copyscape can't detect it.

What I would do if some of the users here or even seo20 would help is to test (if you haven't done so already) how, if and what it looks like when Google indexes your site with the duplicate text. I specifically mean rankings, can you really rank with the copied text because, yes the content definitely is unique but that won't do you much good if the only thing Google sees is gibberish. SEO20 did you do any tests regarding that ?

Don't get me wrong, even if that doesn't work this is an awesome tool, but if it DOES work then this is an incredible tool.

 

[SEO20]

Thanks - I know users of my tool, who has gotten their content indexed in google

I bought the software yesterday, haven't done a lot of testing with it, seems very straightforward you copy the text into the tool, the output looks identical to the naked eye but CopyScape and the TheBestSpinner duplicate checker, which is much more precise than Copyscape can't detect it.

What I would do if some of the users here or even seo20 would help is to test (if you haven't done so already) how, if and what it looks like when Google indexes your site with the duplicate text. I specifically mean rankings, can you really rank with the copied text because, yes the content definitely is unique but that won't do you much good if the only thing Google sees is gibberish. SEO20 did you do any tests regarding that ?

Don't get me wrong, even if that doesn't work this is an awesome tool, but if it DOES work then this is an incredible tool.

 

[drogon]

Thanks - I know users of my tool, who has gotten their content indexed in google

I think the question was "what it looks like when Google indexes your site with the duplicate text"? Does it look like the actual text or gibberish in the Google index?

 

[mariosocieto]

crazy tools!!!!...
I can not say anything words...

this is the craziest things i see since i'm start IM journey 2 years ago...

all hail seo20...

 

[kazhkaz]

Made an order and got details in 30 seconds that was fast, thank you

 

[SEO20]

Thanks man - super with another happy user. Really makes my day.

crazy tools!!!!...
I can not say anything words...
this is the craziest things i see since i'm start IM journey 2 years ago...
all hail seo20...

 

[SEO20]

I aim to be faster than 24 hours - but 30 seconds must be some kind of record

Made an order and got details in 30 seconds that was fast, thank you

 

[SEO20]

All orders has been processed - ready for next batch.

 

[SEO20]

Bonus
Later this month I will throw in a little bonus for all subscribers - can't say what it is yet but you will love it.
Will properly do that EVERY month from now on - whoooooooo hoooooo

 

[ninny83]

Please can you reserve me a copy?

 

[SEO20]

Reserved my friend.

Please can you reserve me a copy?

 

[ninny83]

Thank you mate do i need to pm you after purchase?

 

[mariosocieto]

got lil' problem about the tools, check ur pm sir..

thx so much

 

[btallyopp]

Is this similar to Content Hurricane? If not, how is it different?

When I look at the html code although they're similar looking, they're
not quite the same.

It seems to me that although it beats the duplicate content problem it
diminishes the SEO benefit.

 

[krzysiekz]

Is this similar to Content Hurricane? If not, how is it different?

When I look at the html code although they're similar looking, they're
not quite the same.

It seems to me that although it beats the duplicate content problem it
diminishes the SEO benefit.

Fair point, but I think we need to consider 'where' the SEO benefit comes from. Does it come from works like "are", "and" "because" or does it come from words like "lose weight", "make money", etc?

This is only changing the useless words, in between the main words of the article. All of your if's, but's, and's, are's are altered -but the keywords are not.

End output is perfectly readable content to the human eye, but we assume that to the search engines, this sh*t is fresh. Let's see how long it lasts! SEO20, don't sell this too much!!

 

[ninny83]

I think it safer to use it for third parties links (articles, web 2.0, blog hosting, etc...) not for your content on your momey sites

 

[SEO20]

In some cases posting to WP blogs is giving problems to some setups. Will look more into it later this week. Maybe others has tried this and succeeded, please let me know.

Bet it's related to the local HTML-setup and character charset and encoding - not anything to do with the service of cause - but want to help if I can.

 

[the_demon]

Just ran my first test of SEO20's tool. Just to test I ran it against The Best Spinner comparison tool. 56% unique in one click of a button. Definitely not bad and great for pre-article spinning if your about to do an TBS --> AMR --> BLAST.

This is a truely EASY TO USE, BLAZING FAST, excellent re-writer tool. Basically in a period of 2 minutes I'm going to save $20 bucks by using this tool.

In other words, for every 5 - 10 minutes you use this tool, you save about 2 1/2 - 5 hours of writing time... or days if waiting on content writers AND IT PAYS DIVIDENDS OVER TIME.

This is now a must have for my SEO Arsenal.

PS: I really am on a rapid-pace schedule so that fact that OP responded to my PM with an email w/ the details in about 20minutes was a life saver! Thanks OP.