Article Marketing Robot: Is this FAIR?

[9errors]

@RealBlackHat just switch to another submitter if this bothers you so much. AD (a.k.a Article Demon) does not share the list and it supported adding of directories way before AMR. In fact, it is the first submitter to have that feature and not AMR.

Sniper added that feature into AMR due to competition pressure. I know because I own both of them since day 1.

 

[RealBlackHat]

@RealBlackHat just switch to another submitter if this bothers you so much. AD (a.k.a Article Demon) does not share the list and it supported adding of directories way before AMR. In fact, it is the first submitter to have that feature and not AMR.

Sniper added that feature into AMR due to competition pressure. I know because I own both of them since day 1.

I don't NEED to switch to another submitter. I NEED to bring awareness to what's happening because a lot of people don't know this is happening.

 

[liviug]

What's wrong in sharing?
This great forum is all about sharing.

 

[RealBlackHat]

What's wrong in sharing?
This great forum is all about sharing.

Sure it is... now share me all your xrumer linkslists, your paypal money and send me a pack of zig zags while you are at it

 

[jb2008]

Wow, I believe this is majorly fucked up.

I have been harvesting for over 2 months with keyword lists that took me an additional 2 months to accumulate using various methods. Then once my harvest is done I have to sort through around 1,000,000 results and get the viable directories. I PAID for hrefer, I PAID for my servers, my blood sweat and tears goes into getting the lists I harvest, and Vince is simply using it to make his program better? He is the only one getting money for this.

This is the equivalent of making your own linklists with your own time, effort and money in Xrumer, only to have botmaster to add them to a cloud database of linkslists that everyone can use and spam to death. Hence there will be little or no value in them anymore. This is the WRONG way to do it.


To all other AMR users, I do not WANT your own harvested lists. You keep them for yourselves. That way you can benefit from your OWN work, and I can benefit from mine. It works out better for all of us this way. I will be posting this on AMR forums because this has to stop.

 

[RealBlackHat]

Wow, I believe this is majorly fucked up.

I have been harvesting for over 2 months with keyword lists that took me an additional 2 months to accumulate using various methods. Then once my harvest is done I have to sort through around 1,000,000 results and get the viable directories. I PAID for hrefer, I PAID for my servers, my blood sweat and tears goes into getting the lists I harvest, and Vince is simply using it to make his program better? He is the only one getting money for this.

This is the equivalent of making your own linklists with your own time, effort and money in Xrumer, only to have botmaster to add them to a cloud database of linkslists that everyone can use and spam to death. Hence there will be little or no value in them anymore. This is the WRONG way to do it.


To all other AMR users, I do not WANT your own harvested lists. You keep them for yourselves. That way you can benefit from your OWN work, and I can benefit from mine. It works out better for all of us this way. I will be posting this on AMR forums because this has to stop.

Exactly, harvesting isn't easy. Time + Money....

We don't want your lists, keep them to yourselves... we got our own brains and know how to actually harvest our own.

Tell me when you post to AMR forums, I'll post as well.

So far Sniper hasn't posted here yet... which I find really odd because he's always on this forum helping AMR customers.

 

[Sniper]

I'm in the middle of moving to another city.

I understand your concerns, and you must understand that it was not my intent to benefit from your hard work. I implemented the site import list based on user requests. Just like I implement other features.

I feel the same way and will implement the private feature in the next build. As it stands right now, I am in the middle of adding some other features and I don't want to rush anything out the door that will just cause more chaos.

Please have some patience on this one as I can't put a lot of time into coding right now due to my personal circumstances, but hope to have something out within the next few weeks.

 

[RealBlackHat]

I'm in the middle of moving to another city.

I understand your concerns, and you must understand that it was not my intent to benefit from your hard work. I implemented the site import list based on user requests. Just like I implement other features.

I feel the same way and will implement the private feature in the next build. As it stands right now, I am in the middle of adding some other features and I don't want to rush anything out the door that will just cause more chaos.

Please have some patience on this one as I can't put a lot of time into coding right now due to my personal circumstances, but hope to have something out within the next few weeks.

Please, Please, Please do this Sniper !

We love your program, it's awesome and with it's multi threading abilities it has really struck a chord with me.

I will also donate 20% of my list to the public directory area just to make sure the public directory is healthy enough to entice new customers.

 

[Sniper]

I have no problem doing this. On my end I am getting nothing but junk "directories" that don't even accept articles so this is really a win-win situation. Helps with house cleaning, which was one of my biggest concerns when I implemented the import feature in the first place.

 

[SaraJ]

So what's the problem of someone getting a backlink from a site that you found?

I don't see why someone getting the list hurts your efforts at all.

 

[RealBlackHat]

So what's the problem of someone getting a backlink from a site that you found?

I don't see why someone getting the list hurts your efforts at all.

The more backlinks on the website, the less link juice one receives from that website.

 

[RealBlackHat]

Oh jeez can you guys hear the lots of ya speaking, why should I share my lists to people, I don't care what you say sharing is good, damn seo is a game, why do everyone come on this forum saying oh this is niche made me huge lots of money, but hell no will they share their niche, same thing should go to my lists, if i decided to give all harvested list i will, but i should be giving the option to do that.

Its seem there are alot of lazy ppl on here no offence that want everything to be handed to them on a plate.

Scrapebox is a software where you get your own list, even peepz on here have to sell aa lists. Why cant amr be like that i will harvest my own list i dont mind doing that, but not sharing my hours of harvesting giving someone that cant be bother to do the same. rant over

Agreed. Co-Sign.

 

[SaraJ]

The more backlinks on the website, the less link juice one receives from that website.

Link juice happens page to page not the way you are describing.

 

[RealBlackHat]

Link juice happens page to page not the way you are describing.

Do you have any readings you could supply that would prove what I'm saying otherwise?

I was under the impression that the more outbound links on a website, the less link juice if being flown down.

I thought this holds true for websites in general as well as pages?

 

[blackma]

Get that crap out of here.... your a noob if you really believe in what Matt Cutts has to say.

He's all about disinformation. Articles = Content... how is he going to stop CONTENT? PLEASE dude... just leave this thread and don't look back

Who are you calling a noob? Matt Cutts has absolutely no reason to lie. He was making a point that it is easy for people to go and make articles that point back to their sites in the hope that people take those articles (with your link still included) and then use them on their own sites.
And also the types of sites that just scrape articles for content purposes aren't the best quality so why would you want links from those types of sites?


I am not tryin' to tell you what your doing is wrong. I just hope it still works for you and will continue to do so.

 

[RealBlackHat]

Who are you calling a noob? Matt Cutts has absolutely no reason to lie. He was making a point that it is easy for people to go and make articles that point back to their sites in the hope that people take those articles (with your link still included) and then use them on their own sites.
And also the types of sites that just scrape articles for content purposes aren't the best quality so why would you want links from those types of sites?


I am not tryin' to tell you what your doing is wrong. I just hope it still works for you and will continue to do so.

Look.. Article Marketing works... and will continue to work... get over it.

It works for me.

 

[Imhotep]

I would like to see ability to edit the list myself and keep a database of it on my machine only. Something default loaded every time. Then the usual filtering options could be applied by each different account. But I just hate having all the bad and red sites still in my list count. I would love some better list managing and reporting too. I'm just picking cherries here I guess lol

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

I'm just picking cherries here I guess lol

It sounds to me like you are but expressing your desires is good for the product developer, Vince/Sniper, so he can look at things and see what he can do to make the product better.

Not every request is good but many are.

 

[Sniper]

I have a feature requests section on the AMR forum. Not all items get addressed, but some do. You can blacklist directories by highlighting one or more of them, right-click, blacklist options.

 

[Imhotep]

I knew about the forum, just can't find my login haha, but did not know about the blacklist thanks !

I have a feature requests section on the AMR forum. Not all items get addressed, but some do. You can blacklist directories by highlighting one or more of them, right-click, blacklist options.