Verification on Dating Apps (DAs)

[paschipasch]

Hi,

I'm running an OnlyFans Management and would like to verify my models on dating apps.
The models are not physically available to me but willing to verify.
What is the way to go in the most cases?

We have Anty Detect Browsers, mobile proxies, App Cloner, Androids etc.

Is it possible using an anty detect browser to verify our model?

Or should we run this on real phones using the native apps?
Then how to verify the model if the phone is not phyiscaly available to her?
Remote access is possible. But I think we need some camera tweak for Android, right?

Thanks in advance!

 

[giringlytsu]

1. Real-device flow is safest. Dating apps almost always check a live camera feed, face angle, liveness checks, etc. Anti-detect browsers or emulators usually fail those.
2. Remote phone setup:
   Ship the model a cheap Android with your SIM/proxy setup pre-configured.
3. Have her install a remote-control app (TeamViewer Host, AnyDesk) so you can trigger the camera check when she’s on a call.
4. Camera tweak: On Android you can install a virtual-camera module (e.g. “DroidCam” or “IP Webcam”) so the remote-control session can pass the real selfie feed into the app.
5. If you really want browser-only: You’d need an emulator with a virtual-camera driver and custom liveness-check bypass scripts—but it’s brittle and will get flagged fast.
6. TL;DR: Use a real phone + remote-control + virtual-camera bridge. It’s more setup up front but 100% reliable for verification.

 

[shijin]

Cloned app with camera redirection module worked once, not always.

 

[gubiopenda]

You really need real Android devices for a reliable verification flow—anti-detect browsers or emulators almost always trip the liveness checks on things like Tinder or Bumble. The simplest way is to ship each model a cheap Android handset that you’ve pre-configured with your App Cloner profile and the right mobile proxy. She installs a remote-control client (TeamViewer Host or AnyDesk), and when it’s time to verify you hop on, trigger the in-app camera check, and she follows the prompts.
To make sure the dating app sees an actual “camera,” install a virtual-camera tool (DroidCam or IP Webcam) on the phone before cloning. When you remote in, the selfie capture goes through that virtual driver as if it were the stock camera—so the anti-bot algorithm can’t tell the difference. That combo of a physical Android plus remote-access plus virtual-camera bridge is the only setup I’ve found that passes every verification without manual back-and-forth hassle.

 

[ToyBox Marketing]

What some agencies do is have their female staff verify the accounts and then once it get verified, then the can add their own models' images.

 

[mokeloporoso091]

Hey can you please share the methods you're using to create tinder accounts?

 

[HKWorldmarket107]

Hey can you please share the methods you're using to create tinder accounts?

you buy it

 

[UncleAdolf]

1. Real-device flow is safest. Dating apps almost always check a live camera feed, face angle, liveness checks, etc. Anti-detect browsers or emulators usually fail those.
2. Remote phone setup:
   Ship the model a cheap Android with your SIM/proxy setup pre-configured.
3. Have her install a remote-control app (TeamViewer Host, AnyDesk) so you can trigger the camera check when she’s on a call.
4. Camera tweak: On Android you can install a virtual-camera module (e.g. “DroidCam” or “IP Webcam”) so the remote-control session can pass the real selfie feed into the app.
5. If you really want browser-only: You’d need an emulator with a virtual-camera driver and custom liveness-check bypass scripts—but it’s brittle and will get flagged fast.
6. TL;DR: Use a real phone + remote-control + virtual-camera bridge. It’s more setup up front but 100% reliable for verification.

You really need real Android devices for a reliable verification flow—anti-detect browsers or emulators almost always trip the liveness checks on things like Tinder or Bumble. The simplest way is to ship each model a cheap Android handset that you’ve pre-configured with your App Cloner profile and the right mobile proxy. She installs a remote-control client (TeamViewer Host or AnyDesk), and when it’s time to verify you hop on, trigger the in-app camera check, and she follows the prompts.
To make sure the dating app sees an actual “camera,” install a virtual-camera tool (DroidCam or IP Webcam) on the phone before cloning. When you remote in, the selfie capture goes through that virtual driver as if it were the stock camera—so the anti-bot algorithm can’t tell the difference. That combo of a physical Android plus remote-access plus virtual-camera bridge is the only setup I’ve found that passes every verification without manual back-and-forth hassle.

Is this really the state of verification nowadays? Holy wowzers. Is there any way to create an account on desktop and just do soft actions and never trip verification? Or is verification always demanded?

 

[reversismsisrever]

Currently i'm able to verify anything but Tinder...

 

[UncleAdolf]

Currently i'm able to verify anything but Tinder...

Even Badoo, POF, and Bumble?

 

[reversismsisrever]

Even Badoo, POF, and Bumble?

Yeah pretty much anything that's not Tinder and phone only, if it can be used on a desktop then it's fair game, Bumble therefore is a no-no since they only allow phone use.
Haven't tested POF but i see it's allowed on desktop so i'm pretty sure it's easy enough.
Badoo is what i use for myself and verify for others on the daily.

 

[UncleAdolf]

Yeah pretty much anything that's not Tinder and phone only, if it can be used on a desktop then it's fair game, Bumble therefore is a no-no since they only allow phone use.
Haven't tested POF but i see it's allowed on desktop so i'm pretty sure it's easy enough.
Badoo is what i use for myself and verify for others on the daily.

How in the world do you verify Badoo? Especially if on desktop.

What happens when you verify Badoo and then start uploading pictures of a different person than the verification/original picture(s) on the profile and it locks you out for not being the same person or it requests additional verification?

This was the problem someone I know ran into many years ago before quitting. Feel free to PM the answer instead of posting it if you want.

Also, why is verification on desktop platforms doable/fair game but on mobile not so much?

 

[Kovall]

For me bumble veryfication and web working well. The only problem it's I need partner to scale it im out of money

 

[UncleAdolf]

Also, doesn't Badoo request a VIDEO selfie of the girl doing a unique pose, though? Seems more complex than just presenting an AI picture.

Very curious on this.

 

[reversismsisrever]

Also, doesn't Badoo request a VIDEO selfie of the girl doing a unique pose, though? Seems more complex than just presenting an AI picture.

Very curious on this.

Badoo requests a picture in a certain pose, but in my opinion lies about that, in my experience, they say it's only a photograph, but everything that happens from when you open the camera to when you snap the picture is being sent to Badoo.
Yeah of course it's not "presenting an AI picture", it's a whole process, but the jist of it is that currently it's possible to verify a fully ficticious non existing person.

You can use whatever you want for her photographs, NBP is enough for the most realistic but you can use any current top gen model.
My suggestion would be to just post the perfect 6 pictures and not have to change them, so you don't have to go through verification again, but if you really must, and when you change the photos it asks for verification again, i would just verify it again.

Also it's not the thread for it but i currently pass all Meta (Insta and Facebook) verification as well.

Didn't really want to say anything in specific and don't have much to add, i guess i'll be opening a thread in the marketplace once my account ages 60 days, open to work whenever though.

 

[JoyGlobals]

Verifying models remotely on dating apps is super tricky because most platforms are designed to catch spoofing at a deep level. You're probably better off using real phones with remote access and finding a solid way to virtually feed the camera input, since anti-detect browsers might struggle with the native app's hardware checks.

 

[UncleAdolf]

Badoo requests a picture in a certain pose, but in my opinion lies about that, in my experience, they say it's only a photograph, but everything that happens from when you open the camera to when you snap the picture is being sent to Badoo.
Yeah of course it's not "presenting an AI picture", it's a whole process, but the jist of it is that currently it's possible to verify a fully ficticious non existing person.

You can use whatever you want for her photographs, NBP is enough for the most realistic but you can use any current top gen model.
My suggestion would be to just post the perfect 6 pictures and not have to change them, so you don't have to go through verification again, but if you really must, and when you change the photos it asks for verification again, i would just verify it again.

Also it's not the thread for it but i currently pass all Meta (Insta and Facebook) verification as well.

Didn't really want to say anything in specific and don't have much to add, i guess i'll be opening a thread in the marketplace once my account ages 60 days, open to work whenever though.

How much would you charge per Badoo account to verify? Also, is there a way to take a real person's pictures, upload them to Badoo, and then verify the Badoo somehow? Would doing so be using AI to "recreate them" and their pictures as an AI model person if you don't have access to the person themselves? Thanks for all the info. Fascinating stuff.

 

[JinkHost]

If the models are physically available, why not just have them verify the acc on a cheap Iphone and ship it

 

[UncleAdolf]

Is it allowed to talk about it outside the marketplace? Wouldn't want to get my account banned.

I'm sure it is. We are just talking hypothetically about your hypothetical fee you would charge in the future when you are able to open up a thread. I don't have Telegram but I would ASSUME $5-10 per account would be a fair price for when you (if you do) decide to offer such a service in the future. Feel free to disagree.

NOTE: If this pricing discussion violates any rules, moderators, please feel free to edit it. I am unaware of any rules being violated. I'm only asking a potential future seller their hypothetical future price and also giving a fair assessment of what I think may be fair for such a service.

Also, is it done with you creating the account and then handing it off with cookies, etc.? Or do you need the login and then you log into an already existing account and verify it and then log out? In either case, won't Badoo ask you to re-verify if someone else logs back into their account or the account you made for them? And this can be done on desktop?

Just curious.

 

[reversismsisrever]

I'm sure it is. We are just talking hypothetically about your hypothetical fee you would charge in the future when you are able to open up a thread. I don't have Telegram but I would ASSUME $5-10 per account would be a fair price for when you (if you do) decide to offer such a service in the future. Feel free to disagree.

NOTE: If this pricing discussion violates any rules, moderators, please feel free to edit it. I am unaware of any rules being violated. I'm only asking a potential future seller their hypothetical future price and also giving a fair assessment of what I think may be fair for such a service.

Also, is it done with you creating the account and then handing it off with cookies, etc.? Or do you need the login and then you log into an already existing account and verify it and then log out? In either case, won't Badoo ask you to re-verify if someone else logs back into their account or the account you made for them? And this can be done on desktop?

Just curious.

You're extremely off, since it costs me about 20 to 30 if unlucky just to generate the material that's needed to verify, without counting the time invested or any "fee" for the "method", if i understand correctly it's either:

- You can't even sell the service on marketplace because it's "too much"
- No one is able to offer the service at this moment

So i am not the right guy if people that work for that kind of money exist, maybe there are bigger fishes that verify profiles in seconds and they can offer it at that price, but that's not me.

But from what i can see there's only a few people able to verify with the current identity restrictions.