Your Feedback Needed: A Plan for Old Sales Threads

Which option do you prefer?

  • Option 1: Replace Old Opening Posts' content

    Votes: 192 71.4%
  • Option 2: Delete all archived threads' content & posts

    Votes: 62 23.0%
  • Other (Leave a comment with your suggestion)

    Votes: 15 5.6%

  • Total voters
    269
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Echo

Marketplace Admin
Staff member
Moderator
Jr. VIP
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
13,182
Reaction score
6,753
Hey everyone,

As our Marketplace grows, we always look for ways to improve everyone's experience. Lately, we've been thinking about how best to handle very old/archived sales threads from months or even years ago—specifically, the contact/ Call To Action (CTA) bit of the opening posts of archived Sales Threads. This has been suggested before, and we listen to those suggestions and review what the impact may be of any changes.

Important: Before voting, please consider the problem we're trying to solve from every perspective—a seller's, a buyer's, and the community/visitors' perspectives. Put yourself in their shoes and decide what's best for the Marketplace, the community, and non-members, i.e., those who don't have an account yet but buy services from the marketplace.

The problem

We've noticed that old Sales Threads can sometimes be confusing or contain outdated/incorrect contact info. They also detail services that may be defunct or no longer working, which is unfair for those who actively maintain their service to keep their business and visibility going.

We have had the removal of contact details from expired/archived sales threads on our agenda for a while, and it has been suggested more than once. This includes any sort of Call To Action—website, telegram, teams, email, phone numbers, etc.

The goal

We aim to make the Marketplace safer, more transparent, and fairer for everyone by clearing up archived Sales Threads. To do that, we’ve come up with a few ideas, and we’d love your feedback before we move forward.

Note: We also have a plan for Calls To Action in bump posts, but we won't touch upon that here. Just keep in mind that we already have a plan for that.

The options we're considering

Option 1: Replace Old Sales threads Opening Posts' content

We would edit the first (opening) post of very old or expired sales threads. This means swapping the entire content of the opening post with a notice saying the sales thread is archived, and adding a link to the destination forum where the sales thread is located so that viewers can find similar active services.

PROSCONS
Keeps the valuable discussion and history in the threadThe follow-up posts would still contain CTAs (i.e., contact details and website details).
Removes the risk of members/viewers contacting an inactive or unrelated sellerMembers who don't read the first post, explaining the thread closure, may still contact the seller to receive an outdated service or one that isn't available from that seller anymore.
It also helps redirect everyone to our active and approved services and sellers who support the community.
Preserving the integrity and value of paid memberships
Improves the integrity of the Marketplace and the forum in general


Option 2: Delete all archived threads, including content & posts

The URL of the archived sales thread would still remain accessible (so, it won't be a 404 page), only the content would be replaced. We'd replace the opening post with the current stickies from the same destination forum (Note: this post would always be up-to-date with the current stickies). This way, the active sellers would get even more exposure for their services.


PROSCONS
Ensures only current services and sellers receive visibility.Losing the history of the sales thread entirely (opening post + conversation posts, reviews, etc.)
No contact details/CTA for potential confusion.SEO Impact [deleting thousands of pages - something we'd look into]
No free advertising for members with old/defunct services.If there's a dispute case against a seller, you cannot find contact details without contacting our Support.
Significant boost for stickies in all sections in the Marketplace.


NOTE: We'll maintain this going forward whether we choose option 1 or option 2.

Poll time - We Want to Hear From You!

Please take a moment to vote in our poll. It's a quick way to let us know your general preference.

If you choose "Other", do leave a comment with your thoughts. We'd really appreciate it.

The poll is just the start. What do you think of these options? Do you see any benefits or downsides we might have missed? Do you have a completely different idea that could work even better?

Your experience as a buyer, a seller, and simply a community member matters most here :)

We'll leave this thread open for feedback for the next 14 days from the date of the initial post.
The thread would remain reopened to collect more feedback from sellers and community members.

Thanks for helping us make this community better and safer for everyone. We're looking forward to hearing what you have to say!
 
Last edited:
Option 1 due to the SEO impact. Besides, redirecting people to relevant active sale threads is a good idea.

I'm just concerned about the work volume of this measure, there are probably hundreds or thousands of threads to edit, I hope it's possible to somehow automate it
 
option 1 feels cleaner. ppl still see history + reviews, and new users get redirected to live offers. wiping old threads (option 2) kills transparency and trust signals. better to archive visibly, slap clear notice + link to active sellers, and let convo remain as record. deposit box for new sellers can save a lots of dispute fees headchaces.
 
Option one makes sense. Good to see forum is being cleaned a bit.
Glad you like it! There's a few thread cleanup projects going on, this one was just the first one out of the gate that we were ready to share.
 
Option 1: Replace Old Sales threads Opening Posts' content
I vote for this option, because sometimes you have to change the url of website or add new to Sales thread, and will be easy with this option
 
I think Option 1 makes the most sense — it keeps the history and reviews intact while removing outdated CTAs. That way, buyers don’t get misled, but the community still benefits from past discussions. Option 2 feels too extreme since it erases useful feedback and SEO value. Maybe a hybrid approach could work — replace CTAs in both the OP and follow-up posts, while still keeping the thread content visible.
 
I would go with option 1.
 
Archive old threads, 301 them to the main category they've been on.

No need to keep them alive without the seller paying for them (or even active).

To remove some of the support desk headache with providing contact details of sellers (not sure if the GDPR guys are gonna like this), we can keep it up for three months and then archive it.
 
Delete and archive them, never understood the point of having them other than SEO to keep them visible.
 
Delete and archive them, never understood the point of having them other than SEO to keep them visible.
It preserves the history of the thread mostly - reviews, questions, customer service, etc.

Say a seller had the sales thread closed, but they opened a similar service and would like to use some of the reviews they received in the archived thread - that would not be possible if the thread and its content were entirely deleted.

Archive old threads, 301 them to the main category they've been on.

No need to keep them alive without the seller paying for them (or even active).

To remove some of the support desk headache with providing contact details of sellers (not sure if the GDPR guys are gonna like this), we can keep it up for three months and then archive it.

We thought about that as well. It means 301-ing thousands of URLs :) probably not the best approach here, but it's an option for sure.

As for GDPR, yes, of course, we thought about that as well. Whether you 301 them or delete them entirely, a tiny fraction of their customers might contact support to try to get their contact details.

Pretty much all options come with a set of pros and cons :)
 
I think the opening posts should be kept for SEO/record purposes, but the contact details should be removed from both the opening posts and the bump posts.
 
Option (one) It keeps the useful discussions while clearly showing the offer is closed and redirecting people to active services. Best balance overall.
 
Option 1 makes more sense. it keeps valuable info for buyers and removes old contacts to avoid confusion.
 
Bumping this to get the attention of those who haven't seen it yet
 
Option #1 seems to make sense, but if we want to clear it out of the UI - Why couldn't we implement a filter that we can toggle in case we are interested in seeing these old archived threads?

By default nobody would of course see the contents of these threads, but I think this would be a much simpler change than re-writing posts.

Some kind of status change, or alert component is a must for sure to indicate that it is no longer up to date / available though.
 
Hey guys! Just seeing this . omg late! But here I'm

The thread prefixes are IMO the best for this ocation. Why? Because is attached before the thread's title so everyone will read the prefix first.
Adding prefixes as : Closed or Locked for Old threads will prevent users to click into the thread.
That worked well in the FRC section. I have noticed that.

Additionally we can select multiple threads and just apply a prefix to those old sales threads. That's an easy solution for the staff and a convenient and smart way to inform the users without deleting or replacing their threads.
Besides this is quite easy to do in the ACP, just by modifying the template.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top