AI-generated content is OFFICIALLY allowed by Google!
- Thread starter korcho
- Start date
LetsFkingDoIt
BANNED
- Nov 3, 2022
- 308
- 201
RIP AI Detector case studies https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/case-study-why-you-should-not-used-ai-content-writers.1471575/?utm_source=pm&utm_medium=8-feb-2023&utm_campaign=1471575 (cough cough) as well.
xD
GainTheImpossible
Banned by request of the account holder.
- May 29, 2020
- 1,025
- 1,440
Reward "high quality" not "spam". That will make the difference!
PersistenceAttacks
Junior Member
- Aug 9, 2009
- 162
- 46
This would be fun now. Or might be google love experimenting and will keep killing such websites
While I agree that AI is scary. It's so far off from being smarter than humans, that it's not a problem we should face in our life time. AI is still using human logic, until it's not, then we'll always be able to out smart it.
sagarmalik007
BANNED
- Mar 7, 2021
- 416
- 109
I think it is just the start. Wr need to wait for sometime
clickj4ck
Senior Member
- Aug 30, 2013
- 967
- 326
Bro its already a problem.
Let me tell you how.
Me and you speak on whatsapp or any other messaging app. We talk by Voice messages.
I upload your voice messages to AI . It will mimic your tone and voice exactly like yours.
There are some AI (i haven't used personally ) but you send your images and video and it will copy your face and make a video of you.
Now put both things together and we have an impersonation of you. Then we can use that for any kind of fraud .... from sending messages to your friends and family asking for money or anything else or using your identity for any form of verification.
- Jun 9, 2020
- 6,578
- 3,266
They already doing it.
korcho
Junior Member
- Dec 29, 2018
- 147
- 65
I agree with you.
But
1.If you are not idiot and your wife is not always right, you can give good prompts to the AI and it can actually produce good content and good ideas.
2.ChatGPT does not give latest information. We should wait and see what Bing chat can give us so we can discuss.
3.I disagree. Of course we can agree to disagree and still discuss without offense. With the right prompts you can produce Engagement.
Of course if you pay 500$ per article for a content writer you will get top-notch quality content. In my country 500$ is above average monthly salary .
SeeingEye
Junior Member
- Jan 30, 2010
- 112
- 51
Is this the drop after Bing announced the news of the introduction of AI? And Bing is Google's first competitor, is that why we see the drop here?
- May 8, 2012
- 4,217
- 3,728
"You've heard of whitehat content-marketers who have been bad-mouthing Artificial Intelligence (AI) content ever since it came on the scene. But did you know that Google and content-makers have been using AI-driven content for a while now? Well, news-flash: AI content is here and it’s not going anywhere anytime soon.
These whitehats who claim it’s too far-fetched that algorithms could ever replace the intricacies of human touch, are so far out of touch. The truth is that Auto Content Creation (ACC) is already commonplace when it comes to curating content for webpages, social media posts and web search rankings. And this whole notion of AI taking over content creation for the entire internet? Don’t worry. AI isn't going to be the 'Big-Bad-Wolf' that devours us all.
But still, those die-hard whitehat marketers refuse to consider the idea of AI content. They firmly believe that if something isn’t done manually, it can’t be done right. What compels all these whitehat marketers, who seem to be so adamant, so fixed in their own opinion?
The answer, according to many Artificial Intelligence buffs and marketers, is that these whitehats are now so used to writing everything manually, they don’t know what to do with the volume-based marketing and quantity-driven production shifts required by AI Content. But whatever their reasons for opposing AI-driven content may be, the fact remains that if AI is being allowed by Google — a company with more power and influence on how we use the web than any other — then it can’t be all that bad.
Maybe, if these whitehats took the time to consider the advantages of AI-driven content, they’d find that the benefits far outweigh the risks."
- created by AI, not detected as AI content lol
copyleaks: 99.9 propability for human text, writer.com: 100% human written, openai: very unlikely AI-generated
These whitehats who claim it’s too far-fetched that algorithms could ever replace the intricacies of human touch, are so far out of touch. The truth is that Auto Content Creation (ACC) is already commonplace when it comes to curating content for webpages, social media posts and web search rankings. And this whole notion of AI taking over content creation for the entire internet? Don’t worry. AI isn't going to be the 'Big-Bad-Wolf' that devours us all.
But still, those die-hard whitehat marketers refuse to consider the idea of AI content. They firmly believe that if something isn’t done manually, it can’t be done right. What compels all these whitehat marketers, who seem to be so adamant, so fixed in their own opinion?
The answer, according to many Artificial Intelligence buffs and marketers, is that these whitehats are now so used to writing everything manually, they don’t know what to do with the volume-based marketing and quantity-driven production shifts required by AI Content. But whatever their reasons for opposing AI-driven content may be, the fact remains that if AI is being allowed by Google — a company with more power and influence on how we use the web than any other — then it can’t be all that bad.
Maybe, if these whitehats took the time to consider the advantages of AI-driven content, they’d find that the benefits far outweigh the risks."
- created by AI, not detected as AI content lol
copyleaks: 99.9 propability for human text, writer.com: 100% human written, openai: very unlikely AI-generated
korcho
Junior Member
- Dec 29, 2018
- 147
- 65
If this is the ChatGPT, what are the prompts that you are using to make content undetected for AI Detectors?
korcho
Junior Member
- Dec 29, 2018
- 147
- 65
- May 8, 2012
- 4,217
- 3,728
its GPT-3 davinci.. not gonna share my prompts sorry. its all about good prompt design to stand out
korcho
Junior Member
- Dec 29, 2018
- 147
- 65
What is your opinion on davinci model. Can be fine-tuned to give better results than ChatGPT?its GPT-3 davinci.. not gonna share my prompts sorry. its all about good prompt design to stand out
- May 8, 2012
- 4,217
- 3,728
doesn't even need to be fine tuned, it already gives better results as chatGPT in my opinion. chatGPT is good for answering questions and giving solutions and actually follow a conversation (though it will lose focus after i think 4000 tokens or something). for article generation davinci-003 is better. just depends how you adjust the settings and how well your prompt is designed. my example text was generated with a single prompt and only giving it a topic, then explaining in detail how it should be written. no special keywords or additional example text.
CheapestContent
Senior Member
- Jan 30, 2023
- 895
- 259
Bad news for content/article writers. Anyone can write with some keyword research skills and general writing skills.
New to SEO
Junior Member
- Jun 14, 2019
- 104
- 32
Total GAme cahnger