AI-generated content is OFFICIALLY allowed by Google!

So chatgpt let me stay out, I can not buy plus plan (I live in europe) I only have paypal and SEPA debit card (visa) I'm so pissed off....
we the modern folks not need such imperialims today......I hope the chatgpt team will improve that soon.

Are there really good alternatives on the same niveau like chatgpt to write good expert content?

Do you guys have experience with you.com chat ai?
Bing AI?
contentbot ai ?
The free chrome extension (I have forgot the name)
Or really good chat ai for content creation based on pay as you go who accept SEPA debit cards (Europe) or paypal?

Then there are some journalistic chat ai but I'm not sure if you who is not in a journalism network will get access.
Now I see on my android I have access to the Bing Ai.

Test it ;

a) create available social username from my name: myname
respond; ai asks two questions
then respond: I can not write social usernames for you.....

this will count as three sessions?

b) write 1000 word article about topic: improve work life balance
respond: I can not write 1000 words for you it will eyxceed the limit ....blablabkla
the short article was very generic.

What? cannot write 1000 word article?
Today I will looking for good deeper precise promtps to work with Bing AI, or you need precise 5 chapters so ai can write every chapter with 500-800 words as example.

But when this Bing AI can not write 1000 article for you how you will produce long form articles everyday with this ai?
So my test will count as five sessions, then you need good deep precise prompts, so you you get many ai questions, with that you will fast exceed your daily limit of 60 sessions and you will not produce many articles every day with this limit.

Is google BARD out now? I think it will come in google cloud as pay as yopu go?
 
Although AI-generated content is officially allowed by Google, I'm not sure that is the correct way to read this.

The funny thing about any kind of writing is that human beings can be counted on to only get the message they are prepared to receive.

When you read Google's developer guidelines for content, what they're saying is that as long as it is trustworthy, reliable, expert content, they will honor it.

They don't talk about how the content is generated.

They don't talk about how it's sourced.

They are just focused on what its effect on the reader is.

Now considering the fact that there are fact verification issues with artificial intelligence-created content, this would undermine at least a couple of the guidelines that Google is talking about.

Far from being a glass-half-empty or glass-half-full kind of situation, Google's policy doesn't focus on how content is generated.

This doesn't mean that Google encourages AI content generation.

It doesn't mean that there's some sort of official approval of content just because it's AI-generated.

Instead, it's just a reminder of the content quality that they've always required.

Now if this is going to encourage people to just crank out AI-generated garbage and flood Google with it, don't be surprised if Google strikes back by using its content parameters to filter AI content even harder.
 
OBSERVATION:

I recently received a few PBN posts. The content reads very well, but most of it is listed as "AI Generated" by Zero GPT. I noticed that NONE of the AI posts in the PBN are indexed in Google. There are non AI written pages indexed.

EXPERIMENT:

I just created a brand-new site on a clean domain (never registered previously) using WP. I discouraged indexing while I setup the look and feel of the site. I very slightly reworded the default Privacy page and added around 200 words of "About".

Once the site looked good and was SEO optimized I removed the (discourage indexing). I confirmed the site was not indexed in Google. I then created a lengthy (1200+ word) AI generated article. I then ran the article through SpinRewriter using the most readable settings. A version of this article came back as 64% AI generated according to Zero GPT. I posted that article with images to the new site. NOTE: The new site does not have a static homepage. It is recent posts. The next day I checked Google. The About, Privacy and an empty page with only a Newsletter signup form, were indexed. The lengthy article was NOT indexed.

I have since then posted one more AI article that was slightly spun, and then I posted another large AI article, which was spun. With the recent larger article, I manually rewrote all the portions that Zero GPT detected as AI generated. Let's see what happens.
 
Everyone began to integrate AI in their content, already!!
 
Now Real Game is going to start. AI start ruling our world. No true value for original content hereafter. Can't believe Google supporting AI
 
AI is replacing humans & making things easier. However, manual editing would be better for AI-generated content.
See my observations and experiment in the post above. None of the AI content has been indexed yet. Even a 1200+ word post that I manually rewrote all the sections that Zero GPT detected as being AI generated. I do think that post will get indexed. I added at least 400 words of completely unique content. It's just strange how G has indexed a blank page with a Newsletter Signup form, but none of the lengthy, edited AI content.
 
Back
Top