Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpetlint View Post
Ok, I have Used ScrapeBox for 3 days, and i notice That When the comments Say there where posted, I go tot the Site there is nothing there, and these are the blogs which are Auto accepted!
I went to all the sites where it said they where posted and there is nothing posted!
If i go there post them my self, the comments are posted!
Ideas?

All So the PR/Ping Mod, I have tried this on My sites, I have yet to see any hits Recorded.
These are the crape proxies
Ideas
I have you other Comment tools and so far find them to work better!
I think there More to scrapebox Im missing out on, with out really understanding more of the Feature Clealy

On posts showing or not showing - cookies will store some info and cause inconsistent results like that. It's been discussed before on here.

It may have been discussed before, but is there a fix to this? I'm getting 90% post success to blogengine but 0% actually showing up on the webpage. The only way I can get it to post to blogengine successfully is by using the manual method.

Is there any other way or a fix in the future?
 
Feature Request:
The ability to grab a proxy list .txt every X amount of minutes from a specified URL. This feature will help out greatly for those long posting/harvesting sessions.
 
Hi maybe this is a stupid question,but I am new to scrapebox.how to add the the results of scrape?seems it limits less than 1000,if I want to harvest more URL than 1000 how can I do?harvest it again and again?if doing like this maybe it can only get lots of duplicate URL.How to do?

This is a limitation of search engines, just put different keywords and you will get 1000 URL's per keyword.

This is explained in the tutorials
 
I think SB should be incrase to $500 like Xrumer, because SB is ROCK more than Xrumer

SB can do a lot of works , Xrumer can do some few work.
 
I think SB should be incrase to $500 like Xrumer, because SB is ROCK more than Xrumer

SB can do a lot of works , Xrumer can do some few work.
HMM LOL of course it beats hrefer in scraping nd seems u dont own XR
as far am concerned XR = XR ND SB=SB :rolleyes:
No offense I actually love Sb more than XR with out it i cant harvest urls :cool:
 
I commented to 105 BlogEngine Blogs using 8 different proxies from Proxy Bonanza.

Of the 105 comments, 34 were successful, and the rest failed. Are these normal numbers to see with Scrapebox?
 
I commented to 105 BlogEngine Blogs using 8 different proxies from Proxy Bonanza.

Of the 105 comments, 34 were successful, and the rest failed. Are these normal numbers to see with Scrapebox?
which mode ???
 
Suggestion: I would like to see Expressionengine blog commenting support. They seem to be do-follow comments, but most sites have captcha.

Footprint= "Remember my personal information" "Notify me of follow-up comments"

Cheers.
 
Suggestion: I would like to see Expressionengine blog commenting support. They seem to be do-follow comments, but most sites have captcha.

Footprint= "Remember my personal information" "Notify me of follow-up comments"

Cheers.

I did never post on that, but if i remember correctly, they have a "Location" field on their form. Is that required?
 
Is it a problem that some blogs are showing recent comments on each page? That leads to the point that I made 40 comments that went live but at the end got some hundred backlinks because of recent comments... They will go away but will this hurt somehow?
 
Sweetfunny, I bet like 90% of the questions you get via email are covered in the user guide. So why waste time answering every person? Why not just send them the link to the guide and say it's covered?

It's a shame that a bunch of noobs are making you waste your time like this. The program isn't that complicated.
 
@sweetfunny: i have probably found a bug in your program causing crashes because of the decaptcher integration.

i have sent you an email about this with this title: "program crashing: probable bug found"

please read and reply to it.

thanx
 
583548

Thats the number of unique urls of wordpress blogs I searched as a list now... Took days... :)
 
Well i have been away for a few weeks but got down to testing this amazing little program, how it can be sold for so little is unreal, anyway i must admit i am amazed at how good this program is , it really does what it says, but be careful it is really powerful, use with caution and use it wisely and your rankings will go higher and higher.
 
this ment as info tips i have found ...hope it helps....

ok first i wanna thank the owner of scrape box for
the copy i was given tonight .. hopefully when she
comes back online we can resolve the link problem.

second i wana thank gregstereo for spennding 6hrs
in voice chat with me on yahoo last night
between us we hope these tips help.

first thing..scrape box testing is rather slow
to increase this change these options
open scrapebox ini file edit the following
for faster leeching and testing

Threads=300
ProxyHarvester=200

this will increase the speed it leeches
and will test proxies alot faster..

time out default is 30 seconds
imagine testing say 10k proxies
where 7k are timed out - that means
7000 proxies each being re-tested for 30
seconds each. advise set it lower alot lower

TimeOut= use between 3-5. to lessen test time.

this next part only effects using socks proxies only
now if u use the internal leech option u will see if u
saved any proxies back to the main window all socks
back in the main windows list will look like this

S76.124.88.161:6715
S68.46.19.168:6830
S216.196.224.23:8091
S68.42.227.230:8176
S67.81.179.106:8719
S67.165.59.30:8837

when u import your leeched and tested proxies back to
the main window all socks will have a capital S at the start
of each port number.

why is this important - because if you take a list of socks say
from a post u might find and just load them into your main programe
window to run without testing they will look like this and will not work

76.124.88.161:6715
68.46.19.168:6830
216.196.224.23:8091
68.42.227.230:8176
67.81.179.106:8719
67.165.59.30:8837

the point being leeched lists checked and tested and sent back to
the main window carry the capital S... a socks list loaded into the
main programme window without testing and try to use, all socks
will fail..

sample of my own proxies i test in scrape box tonight..
34pz0ua.jpg


all the lists posted in my forum are mixed lists of
socks and anon proxies, so to get the socks in
the list to work u must re-test the whole list then
send it back to main windows or the socks will fail
if you try loading then directly into the main windows
and only the anon proxies will work as the capital S
will be gone.


UPDATE 2
========

and for thoes who say whats this S all about
heres the s.p.o.o.n. fed version

socks that are tested from the internal leecher
then sent back to the main programme so use
have the S at the start of each sock. it tells
the programme there is usuable socks in the list.

ok so here was have a few socks collected from
the leecher i removed all anon proxies to make the
point socks tested , dead removed

15oa1lf.jpg


now when the socks proxies are sent back to the
main programme look at how the programme shows
them listed. each sock has the letter S at the start
of each port - this format means they will run.
see pic below.
2drdqp1.jpg


if how ever u deciede to grab a list of socks
from a post somewhere and not test them but
just throw them in the main window to use
you will see the capital S is gone and any attempt
to run them will fail see pic

wjjosz.jpg


put simple if u have a list of socks or a list of
anon proxies/socks never just throw them in the
main window to use as all socks will fail..

send any imported liste to the proxy checker
then send them back to the main window so
that the programme applys ths S to the socks
in the list.. understand?


UPDATE 3
==========

finaly which file to edit the settings for faster
leeching and testing - the one marked in blue
34ihe2h.jpg


Threads=300
ProxyHarvester=200
TimeOut=2

if u have no idea about editing only change thoes 3

UPDATE 4
========

FINAL test was to inport 20k mixed proxies anon
socks thrown in the tester..20k on default settings
would take about 2hrs.. with new text edited settings
list loaded leached from 669 sources .
note - while loading a list that large dont touch the
mouse - or the programme will fail to respond and crash.

loaded ammount = 20k
time taken = 29mins
working = 660
this was without me adding my socks into the test list

2cosuw8.jpg


hope this helps - proxygo
2czavd1.jpg
 
Last edited:
this ment as info tips i have found ...hope it helps....


first thing..scrape box testing is rather slow
to increase this change these options
open scrapebox ini file edit the following
for faster leeching and testing

Threads=300
ProxyHarvester=200

this will increase the speed it leeches
and will test proxies alot faster..

time out default is 30 seconds
imagine testing say 10k proxies
where 7k are timed out - that means
7000 proxies each being re-tested for 30
seconds each. advise set it lower alot lower

TimeOut= use between 3-5. to lessen test time.

UPDATE 3
==========

finaly which file to edit the settings for faster
leeching and testing - the one marked in blue
34ihe2h.jpg


Threads=300
ProxyHarvester=200
TimeOut=2

if u have no idea about editing only change thoes 3

hope this helps - proxygo
2czavd1.jpg


I have my proxy harvest set to 75 max threads -

When I normally harvest the free proxies there are normally around 1800 available, then I test and it takes about 20 minutes to test.

I made the changes you mentioned above and ran the harvest then test and it took 17 min 30 sec and I received 0 good proxies.

Most of the failed proxies were listed as "Error 404 Connection aborted upon request". Why so many of these???????

What am I doing wrong here?? 0 good proxies. Also, there are 2 different ProxyHarvester= lines in that scrapebox ini file. One is set to "ProxyHarvester=40000". Is this the one that needs to be changed? Or the other one?
 
Last edited:
Thanks proxygo for the input.

I must disagree with the numbers though.
I made the changes in the ini file and the program a) harvest slower and b) no proxy was found good (probably from time out).

So, you probably have a very low latency line. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top