Building a back link profile Google will love
- Thread starter kuruptseo
- Start date
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
Exactly. black hat these says is basically being white hat. you can build links just do it as a white hat site would, progressively and steady over time.
A new whitehat site will not really have back links since the webmaster is not actively engaging in link building, so the patent is true in its assumptions how it scores back links shortly after inception.
I've seen many sites with only 50-100 back links that were built later on and spaced out outranking sites with 3000 RDS and 100,000s of backlinks.
- Sep 8, 2015
- 5,599
- 5,426
Yes, these can cause a problem. Even manual review.
Important thing to mention is that "spike" is very relative. It can be anything.
For site getting 5 links per month it can be 100, for the one with 100 it can be 500.
I see many local services lately blasting their homepages, becoming a strong outlier and going deeper and deeper.
Turbo B.
Elite Member
- May 24, 2015
- 2,854
- 1,641
Domain using translated / generated content - 4k words on homepage in totally shit format - no headings, nothing - only piece of pure spam text.
It has only one page - homepage, and many subdomains on same keyword in different languages also with one page each.
Backlinks profile - simple GSA blast - some articles, profiles, comments with thousands of OBL. Nofollow / do-follow - 50/50.
No single normal backlink, made manually or paid.
Stats of one subdomain of this domain, which brings the most traffic:
It has only one page - homepage, and many subdomains on same keyword in different languages also with one page each.
Backlinks profile - simple GSA blast - some articles, profiles, comments with thousands of OBL. Nofollow / do-follow - 50/50.
No single normal backlink, made manually or paid.
Stats of one subdomain of this domain, which brings the most traffic:
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
it seems he waited 7 weeks or so about since inception but he blasted the hell out of that.
is he still ranking high a year later?
Turbo B.
Elite Member
- May 24, 2015
- 2,854
- 1,641
He started link blast exactly after 1 month after domain registration.
Screenshots above is from presents time.
Next link blast he did in the end of June 2021.
Main keyword is 3M search volume and he now is stable at #2.
#1 outrank is not possible, because that site has very strong link profile - but he was for some time at #1 also. Right after second GSA blast.
Sorry, i was wrong - he has not 4k but 8k words on homepage.
On-page SEO:
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
he seems to have been slapped from 5M a month.
damn thats insane traffic.
Still getting high traffic it seems but he's getting gradually links discounted..
i doubt he shows up in Bing with those blasts? bing tends to deindex for blasting
damn thats insane traffic.
Still getting high traffic it seems but he's getting gradually links discounted..
i doubt he shows up in Bing with those blasts? bing tends to deindex for blasting
Turbo B.
Elite Member
- May 24, 2015
- 2,854
- 1,641
As i said - site at #1 has thousands of referring domains and is very old.
That's why he was slapped to #2.
On Bing he is at page 7.
Lets analyze another site.
pornhubdeutsch.info
Domain is registered 2019-12-28
First backlinks - 2020-01-21, 2 weeks later - 45 referring domains at once.
Result:
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
interesting. he hasnt seem to have added anything for the rest of 2020 or 2021.
ahrefs showing
Referring Domains
11762% d00ofollow
so he has about 72 d00ofollow RDs.
his alexa rank is # 169,587 which although is not very accurate but this rank usually means about 1,000 uniques per day.
still decent for a blast 1 month after launching and not doing much else
Turbo B.
Elite Member
- May 24, 2015
- 2,854
- 1,641
In my opinion Alexa is useless and outdated company.
Never used it for SEO.
This domain has much more than 1,000 uniques per day.
It is at #1 on 4.9M keyword.
Another site:
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
what is the million dollar keyword for this one?
can you share domain for this one?
thnx
Turbo B.
Elite Member
- May 24, 2015
- 2,854
- 1,641
Not for now.
Maybe later - now it is time to do tests by myself.
Sorry.
Anyway, there can be hidden powerful PBNs behind these sites.
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
Ok cool,
I'm always testing myself, i see tons of different approaches, some working some not. There's always a reason behind it though like hidden PBN yes or social signal to justify the burst etc.
If you find anything else interesting please share.
fc-dh
Elite Member
- Oct 20, 2012
- 3,271
- 2,927
Can you show me some real data on this, cus i am 99.99% sure this is a 100% nonsense (and i have been doing this SEO thing for a while)
But, I will give you the chance to collaborate your insane stance on SEO with actual data, if not...
Well, then we know there is a BST tread coming up soon!
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
I'll help you understand the "insanity"...
"For example, it may be assumed that a document with a fairly recent inception date will not have a significant number of links from other documents (i.e., back links). For existing link-based scoring techniques that score based on the number of links to/from a document, this recent document may be scored lower than an older document that has a larger number of links (e.g., back links). When the inception date of the documents are considered, however, the scores of the documents may be modified (either positively or negatively) based on the documents' inception dates.
Consider the example of a document with an inception date of yesterday that is referenced by 10 back links. This document may be scored higher by search engine 125 than a document with an inception date of 10 years ago that is referenced by 100 back links because the rate of link growth for the former is relatively higher than the latter. While a spiky rate of growth in the number of back links may be a factor used by search engine 125 to score documents, it may also signal an attempt to spam search engine 125. Accordingly, in this situation, search engine 125 may actually lower the score of a document(s) to reduce the effect of spamming."
This is basically saying new domains getting links too soon can be seen as suspicious by the algorithm.
Argue with them.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7346839B2/en
Turbo B.
Elite Member
- May 24, 2015
- 2,854
- 1,641
So I analyzed with Ahrefs at least 20 sites with millions of traffic, 1-2 years old.
Some of them started link building after some time from domain registration - ~2 months and when they already had some organic traffic.
Some of them started link building in a month after domain registration, or even in a couple of days from it - with zero organic traffic.
The conclusion is - 50/50 - both link building methods in a time frame works.
Some of them started link building after some time from domain registration - ~2 months and when they already had some organic traffic.
Some of them started link building in a month after domain registration, or even in a couple of days from it - with zero organic traffic.
The conclusion is - 50/50 - both link building methods in a time frame works.
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
ive analyzed hundreds of sites, from what ive noticed:
the ones that have success who build too early, build MANY more steadily later on (make up for reduced score from early backlinks?)
the ones that only wait until 3 months +++ tend to succeed and sometimes outrank the higher RD early builders with much fewer backlinks.
My theory is the ones who build too early have their scores reduced as the patent suggests "~fairly recent inception documents/websites should not have backlinks, in this instance we reduce the score to counter spamming" must counter their reduced score with many more new ones. (instead of starting as a new site would with score 0, maybe these early back links and what patents says they could be running at a MINUS score before their new campaigns later on kick off, hence sandbox?)
If you waited you'd probably rank among the 1000+RD guys with 1 high authority link every 2 weeks once you reach the 3-6 month aging mark. 6 months would be extremely careful.
Im running multiple experiments right now.
I have 3 networks, same niche, same registration and launch dates. the 1st i build only 1 high quality relevant contextual link to from the first week is doing more poorly than the others that have zero links so far.
The 2nd network i will begin at 3 months
and the 3rd network i will begin at 6 months
Slow high quality varied anchor back links.
This will show me how early is too early. i doubt at 6 months should be "fairly recent" to G
fc-dh
Elite Member
- Oct 20, 2012
- 3,271
- 2,927
Sorry bro but this doesn't support your claim in any way, just take a close look at the SERPS and you will see that, Google claims thousands of patents a year, that doesn't mean they will use it.
Good luck with your BTS thread later on (as we all know it is coming)
kuruptseo
Power Member
- Aug 1, 2021
- 653
- 273
what the hell is bts you keep mentioning?
absolut agree... every NORMAL webmaster will start to promote his new project right after publication. no normalo will wait 3-6 months.... (i do since 1998 seo)...