Building a back link profile Google will love

kuruptseo

Power Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2021
Messages
653
Reaction score
273
This is going to be short, quick and sweet but it gets straight to the point for a winning profile.


Google Algorithm basically looks for suspicious patterns of multiple types:

  • Significant (in programming and math lingo means anything non-zero) numbers of backlinks for brand new domains
  • Spiky growth in back link numbers continuously after that in terms of time periods
  • Spiky growth in anchor words, bigrams (2 words side by side) and phrases
  • Unusual growth in anchors that are too coherent (accurate) OR discordant (non-accurate) so we want to keep a balance of these

So to achieve the most natural looking back link profile to the search engine, follow this protocol for a penguin-proof back link profile:

  • If its a new domain, wait 3-6 months before building anything at all, focus only on content creation and on-site optimization/technical issues/bugs.

Then, when it's time to begin, each backlink you build, create them in this cyclical fashion:

  1. 1 back link containing a post title/keywords in some variation (change up the target page each time to have different anchor titles/pages linked)
  2. 1 generic anchor back link
  3. Repeat
 
How many backlink per day on new site...
nothing for the initial 3 month period.

then begin doing very small numbers and you will see growth.

1 every other week for few months.

After 3-6 months of this you can scale up safely for more.

If you do this right you wont need many to rank well.

Many blast 100s or 1000s of RD's because they begin too early and velocity is sh*t overdone and most back link end up getting discounted or hurting the site instead of helping.

This way you can make each back link work full proper effect.
 
Sorry, I strongly disagree.
Build as many links as you want... do you really think I'll delete or ask people to delete links to my site? No way I remove natural links.
This is probably the best guide - https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/w...build-their-anchor-text-in-backlinks.1118984/.


Oh dear.
that post covers anchor text, i combine it with the proper starting velocity ive seen in many case studies and studying the official patent to make it a sure win.

Links coming in after 3+ months will have much more significant effect without even potentially harming the site than links build from start.

To deny this is to deny the patent for public viewing. They view fairly new websites with any backlinks as spam.

Even if you were to go viral which is a defense many here argue, the site would usually have to be online for some time to eventually have that Oomph article.

Unless you're donald trump with 45office you cannot typically blast away and do well, unless you are an anomaly slipping through the penguin grips which will eventually get slapped at some point.
 
Links coming in after 3+ months will have much more significant effect without even potentially harming the site than links build from start.

To deny this is to deny the patent for public viewing. They view fairly new websites with any backlinks as spam.
That's just nonsense and "public view".

Let's say I start a site and write something new... so I naturally get some links and mentions... is it bad? NO WAY.
Those links are natural and will be fine.

Let's say I buy crap pbn links... nobody cared about my site before and all of a sudden I get links from link farms... BAD.

PS: Please keep your trump talk to yourself, against forum TOS.
 
Things I think are myths when it comes to backlinks:


1. If you have a site with hundreds or thousands of pages, it will be tough to build backlinks.


2. Backlinks are useless if you don't have a large website.


3. You can't get backlinks through guest posts.


4. You can't buy backlinks.


5. There's no point in buying links.


6. Getting links is hard work.


7. You can't get good backlinks from PBNs


There are probably more but I realized how much time I was wasting trying to come up with these LOL
 
You know, I overthought it for a long time, but...

you can rank by buying nothing but brand-name anchor links pointed at your home page, on high-quality sites. This is all I do anymore. If your site gives users what they need, it'll work.

You don't need to overthink it.
 
That's just nonsense and "public view".

Let's say I start a site and write something new... so I naturally get some links and mentions... is it bad? NO WAY.
Those links are natural and will be fine.

Let's say I buy crap pbn links... nobody cared about my site before and all of a sudden I get links from link farms... BAD.

PS: Please keep your trump talk to yourself, against forum TOS.
you obviously didnt read my post concerning your pbn links argument
"
  • Spiky growth in back link numbers continuously after that in terms of time periods"
The trump reference was an SEO example since he bombarded his site with links from the start yet did fine because of the press and other justification enabling such crazy link growth.

Go drink a soybean latte so worked up over my SEO EXAMPLE REFERENCE.

You don't need to agree with my post i couldn't care less. This is for people who want to rank a new domain with efficiency and minimum work for maximum yield.

You know, I overthought it for a long time, but...

you can rank by buying nothing but brand-name anchor links pointed at your home page, on high-quality sites. This is all I do anymore. If your site gives users what they need, it'll work.

You don't need to overthink it.
you've ranked with 100% identical anchors? how much traffic?
 
Thanks for sharing, I normally wait 1 month on a fresh domain and then do social media and directory submissions on 2nd month. By the 3rd month I am doing tiered pyramids, PBNs and parasites.
 
You shouldn't follow a pattern to build links. Just create initial links with your brand name or URL as anchor. As your site gets some traction, you'll either get some natural links or slightly diversify your anchor text. It's better not to stick to a ratio while building backlinks.
 
Thanks for sharing, I normally wait 1 month on a fresh domain and then do social media and directory submissions on 2nd month. By the 3rd month I am doing tiered pyramids, PBNs and parasites.
this is the good approach sir :) when you begin do you start slow?
 
What if my new website gets featured on big social networks right after launch,
and gets hundreds of referring domains daily in organic way?
 
What if my new website gets featured on big social networks right after launch,
and gets hundreds of referring domains daily in organic way?
that would definitely mean you are popular.

but the seo value of the links that come too early on will likely be discounted.

They MAY give seo value later on but based on the patent of how google works any backlinks too close to inception are treated suspiciously.
 
  • If its a new domain, wait 3-6 months before building anything at all, focus only on content creation and on-site optimization/technical issues/bugs.
It is 100% natural for webmasters to build links to their own websites as soon as it is launched. Social media comes to mind, just for an example.

If you have content that deserves to be linked to, it would be unnatural to receive your first backlink 3-6 months after you have published the content.

I think I will personally continue to build links as soon as my websites are launched/content published.

Just don't spam tiered contextual links with SER.
 
Sorry mate. Completely disagree with both your philosophy and approach.

Build your site and links as an actual business would.

1. Start creating social media profiles from day 1. i.e. FB, IG, INSTA, REDDIT, Youtube etc.

Those all have links of some sort, some d0follow, some noFollow

Fill out those profiles with some content.

Obviously don't start doing direct money anchors like "best mattress cover" for quite a while.... I usually wait till site is fully indexed of all content, and ranking naturally for longtails.

2. Start with business directories like Manta, Yelp, Merchant Circle, etc. those are 100% natural links to have for a new business (hint: you don't have to have an actual business location for these sites. Just grab one from google maps; they don't verify like GMB; if you can get a verified GMB even better, but for most affiliate stuff that's not going to work, but you can still get those other business directories)

3. Do some Wiki Data entries, if you can manage it, do some Wikipedia edits and sneak in a reference to an informative post on your site.

4. Put up some click baity interesting article on your site and drive some traffic to it via reddit/quora (keeping with the "mattress theme" post something like some guy jumping off a house onto a mattress type video on your site and link to it. Just pulled that one out of my ass, but you get the idea). The goal is just to have some actual traffic going to your site.

5. You can definitely get a few guest posts on good domains, just keep your anchors fairly neutral i.e. "check out this article" or just naked url.

After a few weeks you'll have a solid and natural looking backlink structure and will have saved yourself several months of waiting around, at which point you should start doing all this stuff anyway.

Main point is, treat your new domain as a new business. There's absolutely no flag warning for a business listing itself on the main business directories, nor creating social media accounts for itself, nor posting content on those profiles that sometimes links back to it's own pages.

The biggest spam flag for new sites is lots of direct anchors from the get go..... and more likely than not certain keywords in certain niches are probably more prone to sandbox (but that's just a personal theory)
 
Brother backlinks strat is complicated , All is we need is time and some focus to seek how algo going , you could try some link pyramids for some rankings , but still the constant ranking secret is buried upon google !
 
Good to have a more in depth idea of how that algorithm works, Thank you
youre welcome sir

Sorry mate. Completely disagree with both your philosophy and approach.

Build your site and links as an actual business would.

1. Start creating social media profiles from day 1. i.e. FB, IG, INSTA, REDDIT, Youtube etc.

Those all have links of some sort, some do-follow, some noFollow

Fill out those profiles with some content.

Obviously don't start doing direct money anchors like "best mattress cover" for quite a while.... I usually wait till site is fully indexed of all content, and ranking naturally for longtails.

2. Start with business directories like Manta, Yelp, Merchant Circle, etc. those are 100% natural links to have for a new business (hint: you don't have to have an actual business location for these sites. Just grab one from google maps; they don't verify like GMB; if you can get a verified GMB even better, but for most affiliate stuff that's not going to work, but you can still get those other business directories)

3. Do some Wiki Data entries, if you can manage it, do some Wikipedia edits and sneak in a reference to an informative post on your site.

4. Put up some click baity interesting article on your site and drive some traffic to it via reddit/quora (keeping with the "mattress theme" post something like some guy jumping off a house onto a mattress type video on your site and link to it. Just pulled that one out of my ass, but you get the idea). The goal is just to have some actual traffic going to your site.

5. You can definitely get a few guest posts on good domains, just keep your anchors fairly neutral i.e. "check out this article" or just naked url.

After a few weeks you'll have a solid and natural looking backlink structure and will have saved yourself several months of waiting around, at which point you should start doing all this stuff anyway.

Main point is, treat your new domain as a new business. There's absolutely no flag warning for a business listing itself on the main business directories, nor creating social media accounts for itself, nor posting content on those profiles that sometimes links back to it's own pages.

The biggest spam flag for new sites is lots of direct anchors from the get go..... and more likely than not certain keywords in certain niches are probably more prone to sandbox (but that's just a personal theory)
1. 99% of these socials will be nofollow though and cannot be for intention of inflating PR since they wont.
2. Creating ANY ******** directory links off the bat which work to inflate PR which google assumes fairly recent inception dates should not have back links pointing to them could and may be seen as unnaturally built by the webmaster and "intended to manipulate PR"
3. Again easy to spot the webmaster is creating these, no new site is having other people who didnt even have a chance to read your content in any reasonable timeframe is creating wiki articles for you.
4. This can work for traffic but again the reddit/quora is nofollow so wont be seen as a violation.
5. This can ONLY be the webmaster building these, so its manipulative and unnatural if done before 3-6 months of site being online to earn "natural links" from age and exposure first.
6. only after several months will you're domain be seen as not a "fairly recent inception date". Restraint can bring a lot of power to back links you build AFTER this probationary period as opposed to BEFORE is what im saying. The same guest posts will have a more profound effect if built after the time google considers "recent inception".

Exactly, you can still treat your domain as a business. Press releases with non-link citations and also NOFOLLOW links since you are trying to do word of mouth, not manipulate your own Search engine ranking right? :p

A business that doesn't know about SEO or have SEO in mind wouldn't look to stick ******** links in articles to get the word out. Treat early promotion as a newspaper.

Yes identical anchors not direct are the problem which i also list in the OP. Google looks for unique words/bigrams/phrases. You always want to vary your anchors with extra words, splitting up keywords sticking a unique word there, and even generic discordant ones.

PS. Can a mod explain to me why we cannot write the word doooo-follow? using a 0 used to work but even that is blocked now. is this a very bad word?
 
Back
Top