Need Help for my Youtube bot

nurmis16

Newbie
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
40
Reaction score
13
Hi all,
I have custom made Youtube bot created with BASS. The bot functions are working well, but Youtube find my bots and bans them with 10 minutes.
My both proxies and phone numbers are from Russia.
Should I change the proxies and phone verification location? or
Should I do smth that shows my bots look natural to Youtube?
 
The country is not the problem.
The algorithm update now recognises botted views, regardless of whether they are from the same IP or multiple proxy IP's.
Prior to the update, a botted view only needed to view content for 30+ seconds for the algorithm to register the view.
Now the algorithm needs that botted view to also interact with the content; a like, or comment, or liking a comment, etc.
It can recognise the interaction coming from the same IP as the view IP.
So it's not as simple as changing your Proxy IP's from Russia to America, or multiple countries.
1000 botted views on a video, without the aforementioned interactions; flag the views as being botted rather than real views.
This doesn't mean 1000 views need to have 1000 interactions in order to be registered by the algorithm.
However a realistic percentage need to interact.
For example 1000 views, 100+ video likes, 100+ comments, 100+ comment likes; 300 total interactions from those 1000 views etc. That looks organic to the algorithm.
1000 views coming from 1000 IP addresses with no interactions gets flagged as botted views by the algorithm.
This is why your botted views keep getting flagged by the algorithm, lack of interactions.
 
The country is not the problem.
The algorithm update now recognises botted views, regardless of whether they are from the same IP or multiple proxy IP's.
Prior to the update, a botted view only needed to view content for 30+ seconds for the algorithm to register the view.
Now the algorithm needs that botted view to also interact with the content; a like, or comment, or liking a comment, etc.
It can recognise the interaction coming from the same IP as the view IP.
So it's not as simple as changing your Proxy IP's from Russia to America, or multiple countries.
1000 botted views on a video, without the aforementioned interactions; flag the views as being botted rather than real views.
This doesn't mean 1000 views need to have 1000 interactions in order to be registered by the algorithm.
However a realistic percentage need to interact.
For example 1000 views, 100+ video likes, 100+ comments, 100+ comment likes; 300 total interactions from those 1000 views etc. That looks organic to the algorithm.
1000 views coming from 1000 IP addresses with no interactions gets flagged as botted views by the algorithm.
This is why your botted views keep getting flagged by the algorithm, lack of interactions.
That is great explanation.
My bot watches the video and likes it at the end. And still keeps waiting in the next video, not quitting suddenly after the watch.
It is not only in the views, but also in the subscription as well.
So do you think the algorithm is unbeatable now or we still have some chance to trick it?
If so what would be the trick ?
 
The Russians, and Vietnamese are at the cutting edge of view botting in a way that can bypass the algorithm.
The majority of SMM panels are unable to offer this as a paid service; hence the majority having view drops after the update.
They are still using the 30+ second view methods, which no longer works without interactions as I explained.
There are some suppliers with the ability to bot views without drops, with steady delivery, in quantity.
However this supply is expensive, and my source isn't something I am going to reveal to you free of charge.
Consider this; say I supply you with the method; that does not benefit me whatsoever.
What it does do is overload my supplier, thus slowing down my own personal delivery. A gain for you, a loss for me.
I can tell you your current method of botting will not work after the update.
The algorithm doesn't weight subscribed views, versus unsubscribed views differently; that makes no difference.
Interaction weights the view, the more interactions the better.
With the Russians, and Vietnamese they work on enormous volume; scaled up to levels you cannot imagine.
They don't need to use proxy IP addresses, as they have tens of thousands of gmail addresses with YouTube accounts ready to view content.
When the algorithm sees views coming from thousands of channels that interact across thousands of videos; they register their views.
You need to appreciate YouTube is mainly automated now, the human view behaviour has now been machine learned and automated.
The updated algorithm looks for human like real view behaviour; such as a view, plus video like, plus comment like, or comment.
They already know the typical real view retention is under 2 minutes, so it doesn't matter if your bot views 30 seconds, 60, 90, 120, etc.
The time stamp where the bot likes the content does not weight the view.
The point is you need to be botting in massive volumes, with massive volume interactions.
The key is the large view volume, and large interaction volume looks organic to the algorithm.
Lumping on 1000 views fast, and then liking 1000 times after 30 seconds isn't looking real to the algorithm; hence your accounts being flagged over and over again.
I will give you something else to consider; the time frame of the views is important.
Lumping on 1000 views within the first hour doesn't look real to the algorithm.
It needs to ramp up steadily; nothing in 0-1 hour, 1-2 nothing, 4-6 it begins, 8-10 it gets heavy, 12+ and delivery peaks, etc.
If you lump on 1K in hour 1 that flags the views as botted as that isn't real behaviour.
Content moves up the rankings not in the first hour, it takes massive views, and massive interactions to move content up the rankings.
Hence views and interactions peaking after 12 hours not in hour 1 etc.
The Russians and Vietnamese aren't just lumping on 100K views in hour 1, with 100K interactions; the delivery is all phased steadily.
Once the content moves up the rankings then delivery heats up to incredible levels of delivery.
So you see its not as simple as having a bot that watches content for 30+ seconds then likes a video.
That needs to be scaled up into the thousands of accounts, and delivery needs to be phased in steadily with time, not lumped on in too short a time frame.
I will give you an example. I am currently using a source; it looks like nothing is happening 4-6 hours after a video upload.
Then 6-8 hours on it heats up with delivery increasing fast with time until the full delivery is done within 24 hours.
No drops whatsoever, the algorithm registers the views. The typical interaction rate is circa 30% of the view total.
I will give you one interaction that the algorithm currently weights which causes it to accept views.
Changing the resolution on a video; from 1080 to 1440 or 2160 HD. This is human like behaviour, changing a video from 1080 to 4K when watching.
Say you have 1000 views going on, and they change the video playback settings from 1080 every view is registered due to the real interaction.
The point is, the interactions need to be varied, not just 300 likes. The variety of interaction is what bypasses the algorithm on massive volume being lumped on.
10K views with 300 varied interactions looks real to the algorithm. 300 video likes in 0-1 hours doesn't.
 
Last edited:
I laughed when people complain about their custom bot or views dropping. Creating a custom bot that escapes YouTube detection is very difficult now. It may work for a while, but it will ultimately failed. This is because YouTube is getting more sophisticated everyday. The constant updates will defeat many bots, sending them to the drawing board.
The best you can do is find a service that works and undetected by the algo.
 
Is it for views? if it is, then views and IPs does not matter.
it's more about your YT accounts. if they are human like (watching history/activity) you will more likely get your views counted.
 
The Russians, and Vietnamese are at the cutting edge of view botting in a way that can bypass the algorithm.
The majority of SMM panels are unable to offer this as a paid service; hence the majority having view drops after the update.
They are still using the 30+ second view methods, which no longer works without interactions as I explained.
There are some suppliers with the ability to bot views without drops, with steady delivery, in quantity.
However this supply is expensive, and my source isn't something I am going to reveal to you free of charge.
Consider this; say I supply you with the method; that does not benefit me whatsoever.
What it does do is overload my supplier, thus slowing down my own personal delivery. A gain for you, a loss for me.
I can tell you your current method of botting will not work after the update.
The algorithm doesn't weight subscribed views, versus unsubscribed views differently; that makes no difference.
Interaction weights the view, the more interactions the better.
With the Russians, and Vietnamese they work on enormous volume; scaled up to levels you cannot imagine.
They don't need to use proxy IP addresses, as they have tens of thousands of gmail addresses with YouTube accounts ready to view content.
When the algorithm sees views coming from thousands of channels that interact across thousands of videos; they register their views.
You need to appreciate YouTube is mainly automated now, the human view behaviour has now been machine learned and automated.
The updated algorithm looks for human like real view behaviour; such as a view, plus video like, plus comment like, or comment.
They already know the typical real view retention is under 2 minutes, so it doesn't matter if your bot views 30 seconds, 60, 90, 120, etc.
The time stamp where the bot likes the content does not weight the view.
The point is you need to be botting in massive volumes, with massive volume interactions.
The key is the large view volume, and large interaction volume looks organic to the algorithm.
Lumping on 1000 views fast, and then liking 1000 times after 30 seconds isn't looking real to the algorithm; hence your accounts being flagged over and over again.
I will give you something else to consider; the time frame of the views is important.
Lumping on 1000 views within the first hour doesn't look real to the algorithm.
It needs to ramp up steadily; nothing in 0-1 hour, 1-2 nothing, 4-6 it begins, 8-10 it gets heavy, 12+ and delivery peaks, etc.
If you lump on 1K in hour 1 that flags the views as botted as that isn't real behaviour.
Content moves up the rankings not in the first hour, it takes massive views, and massive interactions to move content up the rankings.
Hence views and interactions peaking after 12 hours not in hour 1 etc.
The Russians and Vietnamese aren't just lumping on 100K views in hour 1, with 100K interactions; the delivery is all phased steadily.
Once the content moves up the rankings then delivery heats up to incredible levels of delivery.
So you see its not as simple as having a bot that watches content for 30+ seconds then likes a video.
That needs to be scaled up into the thousands of accounts, and delivery needs to be phased in steadily with time, not lumped on in too short a time frame.
I will give you an example. I am currently using a source; it looks like nothing is happening 4-6 hours after a video upload.
Then 6-8 hours on it heats up with delivery increasing fast with time until the full delivery is done within 24 hours.
No drops whatsoever, the algorithm registers the views. The typical interaction rate is circa 30% of the view total.
I will give you one interaction that the algorithm currently weights which causes it to accept views.
Changing the resolution on a video; from 1080 to 1440 or 2160 HD. This is human like behaviour, changing a video from 1080 to 4K when watching.
Say you have 1000 views going on, and they change the video playback settings from 1080 every view is registered due to the real interaction.
The point is, the interactions need to be varied, not just 300 likes. The variety of interaction is what bypasses the algorithm on massive volume being lumped on.
10K views with 300 varied interactions looks real to the algorithm. 300 video likes in 0-1 hours doesn't.
Hey man,
That was eye opening. I really appreciate that.
 
I laughed when people complain about their custom bot or views dropping. Creating a custom bot that escapes YouTube detection is very difficult now. It may work for a while, but it will ultimately failed. This is because YouTube is getting more sophisticated everyday. The constant updates will defeat many bots, sending them to the drawing board.
The best you can do is find a service that works and undetected by the algo.
Where is my complain tho? I asked some directions.
Anyway thanks for the info
 
Hi mate, watch-out when you are using a bot for YT. Because, everyday YT algo is getting better and better with the new updates. I feel these artificial things wont last long. If algo finds it, too risky for the channel. Think about it.

If you are having multiple channels, then take up some channels within the niche you are familiar with and grow them organically. For remaining channels you can think about bot traffic. In that at least you are diversifying risk man.

Hope it helps.
 
Hi all,
I have custom made Youtube bot created with BASS. The bot functions are working well, but Youtube find my bots and bans them with 10 minutes.
My both proxies and phone numbers are from Russia.
Should I change the proxies and phone verification location? or
Should I do smth that shows my bots look natural to Youtube?
What kind of ban you're getting ?
 
Well the legit way is to hire some freelancer to make a really catchy thumbnail and really high-quality video
introduction about your channel, but it must be top quality video + top quality video edit.

* Under 2 or 5 mins, because people after that lose focus and have CTA inside videos like subscribe, hit that notification bell + see other videos.

* Also don't use in video ads use thumbnail ads that get mixed with recommendations at the end of the video and in the sidebar.


Run it 30 days * $10 and let us know the results. Because these things have lower results in the first two weeks after algo had some data collected with then pass to AI and then you get much better results due to ads being placed in front of people which behavior showed that they can benefit from your video.

* Also besides this do the #100 Days Content challenge, and while running ads also upload 1 video each day.

So you will get real user interactions from ads + adding new content daily this will also make youtube show your videos in an organic way as well.

My opinion is that for other services like TikTok, Linkedin, etc... SMM panels will work but not for youtube.
 
I am not 100% sure, but I think yeah I use them.
(Programmer told me before)
how come you don't know. I mean do pay monthly for them. FingerprintSwitcher is 20$ a month if you are not using it then you have too. by the way the free version is worthless. also, u will need to use the 4g proxies.
 
how come you don't know. I mean do pay monthly for them. FingerprintSwitcher is 20$ a month if you are not using it then you have too. by the way the free version is worthless. also, u will need to use the 4g proxies.
Yeah I am using free version, cause the bot programmer told me it was around $20.
 
YouTube has done updates to recognse all this.
 
Back
Top