Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[Loklush]

Sales Thread Update

This sales thread has been permanently closed!

Original sales content and contact information have been removed to protect our members
and maintain the quality of the Marketplace.

Click here to find active and tested Content / Copywriting services!

Check out our Marketplace Rules if you wish to become a seller in our Marketplace.​

 

[iModBot]

Marketplace Thread Approved​

Summary
This content writing service has been tested by the marketplace moderation team to ensure that it meets the standards for the marketplace. We cannot guarantee any satisfaction for the content you receive. Please do your own due diligence in looking into the seller and seeing if their writing is what you are looking for.

Service Information

• The content delivered for the review met the specifications requested by the reviewing moderator (word count, topic, etc.).
• The content was checked for plagiarism and no duplicate content issues were detected.
• There were minimal to no spelling or grammar errors present in the content.
• The content itself was readable.

Thread Edit Log

• Service update - 7 April 2024

Spoiler: Thread Edit Archive

With anything more than 5 going in here

Information For Buyers:

• Service Quality: The quality of the product or service that I receive is what you should expect, or better. If you feel that the quality of the service has dropped significantly, please let us know via the report button.
• Disputes: If you do not receive a product or service as advertised, or at all in the event of a dispute, do not be afraid of a "no refunds" refund policy as you are allowed to request a refund through the shit list process. For more information and to see whether or not your dispute qualifies, refer to the shit list rules and procedures.
• Review Copies: Per the marketplace rules, if a seller does not offer trials or review copies, please do not request them in the sales thread, otherwise your post will be removed and further action may be taken.

 

[Mr Positive]

I received my review copy earlier


1) The article is excellent just what I wanted for my client.

2) I liked how you connected the past, present with the dates.

3)The flow, research clearly shows you value your clients

4) For a change I didn’t need to ask for a copyscape report so that’s a bonus for me.

5) Overall I see lot of creativity and all the signs that you’ll succeed here

 

[EvilLore]

Can I get some samples for the different packages?

 

[goflippa]

Any samples?

 

[Loklush]

I received my review copy earlier


1) The article is excellent just what I wanted for my client.

2) I liked how you connected the past, present with the dates.

3)The flow, research clearly shows you value your clients

4) For a change I didn’t need to ask for a copyscape report so that’s a bonus for me.

5) Overall I see lot of creativity and all the signs that you’ll succeed here

Thanks for the review

 

[Loklush]

Can I get some samples for the different packages?

Any samples?

Check your inbox

 

[xReminisce]

I received an review copy from the OP earlier this year

Disclaimer: Some people see this as a problem, others don't.
However, OP provides the articles in Google Drive Link, the article was in Microsoft Word.
As some people are very skeptical about Google spying on everything.

I ran this through Quetext with no plagiarism detected.

I received 550 words total including Headers and Meta Description.
The article did not feel like it was written by a native writer, but instead, someone with good understanding of the English Language.
There was a few spelling and punctuation errors.
Some sentences felt really forced to include the main keyword in.

From what I see, the article was well researched, the KW I gave was very niche and would be quite difficult without any research nor understanding of the topic.
The article was well formatted and wasn't a long piece of text.
It was divided into sections through headers, pictures, bullet points and disclaimers as any well written article in this KW would have done.
I did not agree with the very first paragraph did not particularly like I felt it was slightly astray from the KW.
This is where rewrites comes in. I am not going to ask OP to rewrite this, however, if this was a written article I purchased, I am very confident OP would rewrite it to a acceptable standard (something I would agree with) as it was just a few sentences out of 500 words I did not like.
I was provided with the StockFree Image and a picture of the CopyScape report within the Word Document.

If we are going into more detail on reviewing the article itself.
In articles, it would not sound good using "etc" in any article under nearly all circumstances.
If we are taking a more literal example of the article

Garden Peas ( you can also divide it into survivor peas, spring peas, etc.),
Snap Peas (you can also divide it by Chinese Bone Peas, Chinese Snap Peas, Chinese n Peas, etc.) and

It would sound alot more professional if it was written this way

Garden Peas - Sub-branches includes survivor peas or spring peas.
Snap Peas - Sub-branches includes Chinese Bone Peas, Chinese Snap Peas and Chinese n Peas

The "and" is not necessary as the current format for this list is in dot points.

Otherwise, with a bit of cleaning up, this level of article could very well make it to Money sites or inner pages.

 

[CapSignal]

Any samples?

 

[gyamasak]

I ordered to test. Will leave an honest review after

 

[aristocratic]

I received a 500-word Article to Review this service!

The article was delivered within 4 days.
I asked the seller for some revision and he kindly accepted and fixed it in a few hours.
It had proper Heading and no grammar mistakes. 3 freepik images included.
Copy scape report delivered with the article.

Overall experience: Good article for the PRICE !

 

[MisterF]

Review

I was offered a sample article to see what this service was about.

TAT was quick, the final file was delivered with a Copyscape screenshot and a RankMath screenshot.

The quality is ok, it's ideal for inner pages or for PBNs/buffer sites.

"Know here how to" isn't something a native English speaker would ever say. The service does advertise this fact; No, this content is created by non-native English writers.

That being the case, this is what is advertised and for the price isn't a bad offering at all.
I ran the article through Quetext and it was fine.

Instructions given were very basic and what was delivered was along the suggested pricepoint.

 

[provocative]

I have received a review copy from this seller before he opens this thread. I provided a feedback to him via DM but now sharing it here as well.

+ Really liked the quality considering the price
+ Having 2 stock-free pictures with the article is great
+ I liked headings, it was creative.

- Pictures were not directly related, I mean they were related to my niche but was not matching the article.

Overall, it's a great service for the price. I am thinking to order again when I need a similar article.

 

[cx3571]

Genuly interested. But I need texts 1) which have to be perfectly written (style) and also has a 70+ score with surfer seo. I am ready to pay more than your prices if you meet these 2 criterias...

 

[Loklush]

I ordered to test. Will leave an honest review after

Please check your inbox

 

[Loklush]

Any samples?

check your Inbox

 

[Loklush]

I received an review copy from the OP earlier this year

Disclaimer: Some people see this as a problem, others don't.
However, OP provides the articles in Google Drive Link, the article was in Microsoft Word.
As some people are very skeptical about Google spying on everything.

I ran this through Quetext with no plagiarism detected.

I received 550 words total including Headers and Meta Description.
The article did not feel like it was written by a native writer, but instead, someone with good understanding of the English Language.
There was a few spelling and punctuation errors.
Some sentences felt really forced to include the main keyword in.

From what I see, the article was well researched, the KW I gave was very niche and would be quite difficult without any research nor understanding of the topic.
The article was well formatted and wasn't a long piece of text.
It was divided into sections through headers, pictures, bullet points and disclaimers as any well written article in this KW would have done.
I did not agree with the very first paragraph did not particularly like I felt it was slightly astray from the KW.
This is where rewrites comes in. I am not going to ask OP to rewrite this, however, if this was a written article I purchased, I am very confident OP would rewrite it to a acceptable standard (something I would agree with) as it was just a few sentences out of 500 words I did not like.
I was provided with the StockFree Image and a picture of the CopyScape report within the Word Document.

If we are going into more detail on reviewing the article itself.
In articles, it would not sound good using "etc" in any article under nearly all circumstances.
If we are taking a more literal example of the article

It would sound alot more professional if it was written this way

The "and" is not necessary as the current format for this list is in dot points.

Otherwise, with a bit of cleaning up, this level of article could very well make it to Money sites or inner pages.

I received a 500-word Article to Review this service!

The article was delivered within 4 days.
I asked the seller for some revision and he kindly accepted and fixed it in a few hours.
It had proper Heading and no grammar mistakes. 3 freepik images included.
Copy scape report delivered with the article.

Overall experience: Good article for the PRICE !

Review

I was offered a sample article to see what this service was about.

TAT was quick, the final file was delivered with a Copyscape screenshot and a RankMath screenshot.

The quality is ok, it's ideal for inner pages or for PBNs/buffer sites.

"Know here how to" isn't something a native English speaker would ever say. The service does advertise this fact; No, this content is created by non-native English writers.

That being the case, this is what is advertised and for the price isn't a bad offering at all.
I ran the article through Quetext and it was fine.

Instructions given were very basic and what was delivered was along the suggested pricepoint.

I have received a review copy from this seller before he opens this thread. I provided a feedback to him via DM but now sharing it here as well.

+ Really liked the quality considering the price
+ Having 2 stock-free pictures with the article is great
+ I liked headings, it was creative.

- Pictures were not directly related, I mean they were related to my niche but was not matching the article.

Overall, it's a great service for the price. I am thinking to order again when I need a similar article.

Thanks For review my service

 

[Loklush]

Genuly interested. But I need texts 1) which have to be perfectly written (style) and also has a 70+ score with surfer seo. I am ready to pay more than your prices if you meet these 2 criterias...

Check your Inbox

 

[MJ]

Disclaimer: I received a review copy of 500 words from OP in exchange for a review.

OP had delivered the articles using Google Drive and it was in MS Word format. This can be problem with some users.

I checked the content manually using double quotes on Google and didn't found any Plagiarism.

There were around 600 words in total, including the meta description. Apart from this, there were 3 relevant images included from the freepik as well.
The quality of content is ok for inner money pages or for your PBNs/ Web 2 blogs. The article was researched, properly formatted, with heading tags, small paragraphs (under 300 words). I ran it on Yoast content analysis and everything was green except for Flesch Reading ease, which was 42 for this copy.

Overall, the quality of content is good for the price and will be useful for keeping your PBN's / Web 2 updated.

 

[Loklush]

Disclaimer: I received a review copy of 500 words from OP in exchange for a review.

OP had delivered the articles using Google Drive and it was in MS Word format. This can be problem with some users.

I checked the content manually using double quotes on Google and didn't found any Plagiarism.

There were around 600 words in total, including the meta description. Apart from this, there were 3 relevant images included from the freepik as well.
The quality of content is ok for inner money pages or for your PBNs/ Web 2 blogs. The article was researched, properly formatted, with heading tags, small paragraphs (under 300 words). I ran it on Yoast content analysis and everything was green except for Flesch Reading ease, which was 42 for this copy.

Overall, the quality of content is good for the price and will be useful for keeping your PBN's / Web 2 updated.

Thanks for review