The crazy part here is the hosting. Takedown a website just because some guys told it was full of hate while you can see daily young people on Reddit, Instagram, and Facebook being threatened, abuse, destroy from these same social media who talk everywhere about "keeping" the platform sane with no violence. I cannot count how many Reddit videos from the BLM situation had 100K+ upvotes where people showed how they destroyed their neighbor's business happily... many accounts banned because they wanted to show how stupid it was.
The big ones want people to stay stupid and make them think how they want them to think.... and it works perfectly lol
Yeah the sad thing is that when it's the other way around, people mobilise and boycott businesses that do they kinds of things Amazon and social media has done to Parler. When the shit flows in this direction - silence. I'm guessing most of the people that support Parler still have Fb accounts and most people that support Drumpft still have Twitter accounts.
It's probably mostly to do with social media and the mainstream media inciting responses to certain things (on one side) and criticising those who respond to the other side. Also they can easily make certain stories, movements and hashtags trend, while suppressing others.
One black drug addict gets killed by police (as wrong as it was) and 20 cities burn for weeks. The account of the President of America is banned from all social media and simultaneously the ability to congregate on the next best thing is also shut down, no one has done a fucking thing.
I'd like to see riots in Silicon Valley and people smashing up the social media headquarters in response to it. Will there be? Nope. One side is prepared to take action, the other side has spent decades getting comfortable and soft. Pretty weak imo. If this happened in 1946, the execs of most of the tech companies would probably be lynched or lined up and shot at dawn.
Sadly, the influence of the strong men that fought in wars has all but faded now, and what's left is selfies, cancelling and micro-aggressions.
You could just use your own datacenters rather than reinvent the wheel.
Yep, datacenters at that level aren't cheap, but I'm sure if they tried to raise capital for building one and sought funding they would get 10X what they're after.
They could even run a kickstarter and would easily get tens of millions I would guess after all this bullshit. I'd personally send them a decent amount of cash, like I did for Kyle Rittenhouse's court case, and I'm sure a shitton of other people would too.
They were seeing millions of downloads a day before they got fisted - if every one of those people donated $1 they would have the datacenter they need.
AWS is known for vendor-lockin. I'm guessing parlor used all the AWS specific techs (dynamodb, aurora, elasticache). It is fucking impossible to migrate. That's how AWS keeps its customers locked-in.
I fucking love aws. What AWS did was wrong. I don't give a fuck about parlor (or free speech in america

). But after this incident, I'm more careful about what kind of aws-tech I use to build stuff.
Cassandra instead of Dynamodb
Manual auth instead of Cognito
Mysql instead of aurora
Redis instead of elasticache
.. this list goes on....
Yeah it's the m.o. of all the big tech companies - build something so good that people really want to have it, but they lock them in.
I've never used AWS for anything, although considered it a few times. After this, I'd prefer to build a wix site than put anything on AWS.