Parler CEO Goes Into HIDING

Inciting violence is telling people to go out and carry out illegal acts of violence.

Maybe if you email Twitter and explain they are wrong and that you know best they will listen?

Not often we get to hear this level of insight from a practicing lawyer, thank you for sharing.
 
I don't remember any of the famous people being banned from Twitter for saying to murder Orange Man, or to murder the Covington Kids, or to murder Kyle Rittenhouse. Deliberately misgender Ellen Page and you can bet your life you'll be banned though.

Inciting violence against those people is obviously not the right kind of inciting violence.. Guess when you make the rules you can apply them as you want. Just a bit laughable to portray the situation as fair.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love how so many people don't wanna talk politics until they are the ones on the lamb.
 
I don't remember any of the famous people being banned from Twitter for saying to murder Orange Man, or to murder the Covington Kids, or to murder Kyle Rittenhouse. Deliberately misgender Ellen Page and you can be your life you'll be banned though.

Inciting violence against those people is obviously not the right kind of inciting violence.. Guess when you make the rules you can apply them as you want. Just a bit laughable to portray the situation as fair.
I no joke go banned on Twitter the first tweet I ever made. All I said was surely Orange man is not as bad as you say. Then people try to tell me its cause "the rules". There are no rules.
 
That are not true, I red just recently tht 70000 accounts were banned for similar things just recently.

sea hear: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/ne...-70000-accounts-following-the-capitol/593193/
They primarily deleted QAnon supporting accounts.. further supporting what I said about one group of people being targeted while the other isn't.

That doesn't even 1% dispute the idea that a lot of famous people happily called for the murder of the Covington Kids and Kyle Rittenhouse, as well as Drumpft, and 100% of their accounts are still active.

It would just be good if there was some semblance of balance to the way that these rules are applied. When the employees of a company are entirely comprised of people that all think a certain way - what other outcome could you expect I guess. It's just preposterous to pretend that's not how it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They primarily deleted QAnon accounts.. further supporting what I said about one group of people being targeted while the other isn't.

That doesn't even 1% dispute the idea that a lot of famous people happily called for the murder of the Covington Kids and Kyle Rittenhouse, as well as Drumpft.

It would just be good if there was some semblance of balance to the way that these rules are applied. When the employee of a company are entirely comprised of people that think a certain way - what other outcome could you expect I guess.
Didn't Cathy Griffith just repost herself holding Trumps bloody head? Nah that's not a call to violence but saying "it will be wild" is. Hmmmm
 
They primarily deleted QAnon supporting accounts..

Not true, they clearly stated they deleted the accounts of people spreading misinformation, that has nothing to do with what cluub you are in its just facts or dangerous misinformation.

Thas all.
 
If I ask you to verify this very simple misinformation will your next link also prove your own argument wrong or? What am I missing here?

Dangerous misinformation which is extremely easy to verify was used as a reason for Twitter to ban 70000 people propagating it, as literally posted by twitter who did it, due to this website's rules regarding not mentioning politics I cannot post links to what those people have done.

In short, they broke a site's rules, those rules were to not spread dangerous lies, sadly I can't post links as those people were posting lies about politics and that is banned here.

Please feel free to use your own time and broser to search and sea 4 yoself.
 
If its so dangerous, then what is the actual homicide offense rate of that selected group(not including domestic violence)?:anyway:
Well that group doesn't tend to dwell in cities so look at the crime rate of a state without the big cities and you will see the difference.
 
IMO Reddit is the most toxic social media out there. I wouldn't say I like to spend much time there it isn't good for my mind.
Parler wasn't so awful.

I tihnk it just comes down to having good moderation and strong user agreement, same for any platform really, without it, any site at all can be ruined by complete idiots.
 
I want to build a decentralized social media "platform" network badly.. same as Bitcoin, runs autonomously on thousands of servers globally using a good set of heuristics to moderate autonomously with that set being able to evolve based on logic instead of the control of a single person or small group.

The problem is storing that much data on a blockchain is not possible by any stretch of the imagination currently. The data stored in each block on the Bitcoin blockchain had to be designed to be relatively small to make that possible.

But fuck this, seriously. Someone needs to put the boot into the tech monopoly - at some point the growth of decentralized information sharing is inevitable, like it was with decentralized value creation and transfer.

These mf's are more powerful than the President of the world's most powerful country, they're unelected, clearly have no problem at all with censorship, and have openly engaged in the manipulation of the way people think on a massive scale.

Think what you want about the people that used Parler, but the ease with which they could get rid of this platform and send the CEO into hiding should ring major alarm bells for anyone that has even a shred of intelligence and the ability to think critically.
 
i just dont see parler going away, they no they have a section
of the market twatter cant control , free speech
Theyve gone away, I can't even find the app in the appstore when I search now.
 
Back
Top