- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,786
- 31,562
I took the Chinese vaccine and so far everything's OK just 现在一切都好, 不用担心。放松点, 伙计们。你们今天做什么?赚钱?我今天晚些时候要扔 Bbq 。
No, they aren't. https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19#:~:text=Herd%20immunity%2C,exposing%20them%20to%20it.
From your link. Opening paragraph
‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.
What part of that definition is "vaccine herd immunity" in fact I can't find any definition of it being called "vaccine herd immunity"
It's either a vaccine or it's herd immunity.
A vaccine can "help" achieve herd immunity IF that is even a thing. They are NOT the same.
People need to really focus and read about terms real meaning before misinterpreting them in their mind right away.
"Herd immunity" does not mean
?
"Herd immunity" is not something necessarily achieved via natural exposure to a pathogen, most often it's the opposite (via vaccination), look up the definition.
What are you talking about?Yes because there are countless examples of herd immunity working through history that it's the only viable path to anything....
I'm not twisting or miss representing anything.
If you bother to read previous posts I quoted someone that posted or made out vaccine and herd immunity are the same thing because there is a thing called "vaccine herd immunity" there is no such thing. I can't even find the definition of it.
This is why I kept out of the last 50 or so threads like this, we all go round in circles and miss information spreads. Just like "vaccine herd immunity" IF that was the case why don't we all get the flu jab every year? Lets take care of that along with COVID-19 at the same time eh?
People take 1 post twist to come off as the next high IQ genius on here because they can read a wiki.
What are you talking about?
Polio herd immunity is reached when around 85% of the population are vaccinated.
Measles herd immunity is reached when around 90% of the population is vaccinated.
It's literally in the article I linked and it's in this one https://www.ovg.ox.ac.uk/news/herd-immunity-how-does-it-work
Its how smallpox was wiped out, through herd immunity obtained through vaccines.
Yes because there are countless examples of herd immunity working through history that it's the only viable path to anything....
I'm not twisting or miss representing anything.
If you bother to read previous posts I quoted someone that posted or made out vaccine and herd immunity are the same thing because there is a thing called "vaccine herd immunity" there is no such thing. I can't even find the definition of it.
This is why I kept out of the last 50 or so threads like this, we all go round in circles and miss information spreads. Just like "vaccine herd immunity" IF that was the case why don't we all get the flu jab every year? Lets take care of that along with COVID-19 at the same time eh?
People take 1 post twist to come off as the next high IQ genius on here because they can read a wiki.
Because of antivaxxers.Yeah because kids dont get polio still? or Measles? I Think my kids had measles both had MMR...
Still cases of Polio in the world... or is that the 15%
Yup herd is working out great there.. maybe when it gets to 99% might kick in
Because of antivaxxers.
Two types of polio have been wiped out, the remaining type has a stronghold in countries with a strong mistrust of vaccines
Are you saying that both the WHO and Oxford have the wrong definition of herd immunity through vaccines?
While the semantics of a term is always fun to hash over for a whole page, what's more interesting in this comment is the part about two types of polio being wiped out and the one remaining types still being in countries where there is a mistrust of vaccines.Because of antivaxxers.
Two types of polio have been wiped out, the remaining type has a stronghold in countries with a strong mistrust of vaccines
Are you saying that both the WHO and Oxford have the wrong definition of herd immunity through vaccines?

I literally have no idea what you're talking about.Nope. You have the wrong definiton of it. You said vaccine herd immunity which is my compelte argumnet. There is no such thing.
There is no herd immunity. Immunity is established once you vaccinate a bunch of people, people can still catch it but chances are lower. Where does herd immunity kick into that?
It doesn't it's called a vaccine. If herd immunity wa a thing why do we all get a cold?
As for the anitvaxxers... I just said both my kids got the MMR jab... they still caught measles.
Honestly this entire thing is idotic.
Show me a case study in all of man kinds history where herd immunity took place WITHOUT a vaccine. Then tell me there is a thing called Herd Immunuty.
Probably because it was very close to being eradicated. Glad the vaxcine efforts are paying off, aren't you?While the semantics of a term is always fun to hash over for a whole page, what's more interesting in this comment is the part about two types of polio being wiped out and the one remaining types still being in countries where there is a mistrust of vaccines.
If this is what you're talking about:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/wor...e-workers-have-three-diseases-to-fight-polio/
This paragraph is particularly interesting:
Can anyone explain to me why a disease that has been eradicated to the point that the year before the time of writing there had been a grand total of 12 cases gets the kind of attention like there's a serious problem in Pakistan that anti-vaccination sentiment is causing?
In October there had been... 76 cases. 76 cases in a country of 212M people. Well that certainly deserves a lot of media coverage. When you only have 76 people catching a disease from a population of 1/5 of a billion people, that's called being eradicated and is no longer news-worthy.
Less people getting polio is positive, yes. News stories making 76 cases of polio seem like it's more significant than it really is aren't positive, they're manipulative, or at best, pointless.Probably because it was very close to being eradicated. Glad the vaxcine efforts are paying off, aren't you?
Because of antivaxxers.
Two types of polio have been wiped out, the remaining type has a stronghold in countries with a strong mistrust of vaccines
Probably because it was very close to being eradicated. Glad the vaxcine efforts are paying off, aren't you?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32101-4/fulltextLess people getting polio is positive, yes. News stories making 76 cases of polio seem like it's more significant than it really is aren't positive, they're manipulative, or at best, pointless.
Where is your source for the statement that:
(furious keyboard typing ensues)
No worries.So is that a vacine or herd immunity.
There is NO SUCH THING AS HERD IMMUNITY AS PEOPLE STILL CATCH VIRUSUS REGARDLESS OF ANTI VAXERS OR NOT. FLU, COLD, MEASLES, POLIO.
FOR FUCKS SAKE.
You can't have it both ways.
Go to WIKI type in. vaccine herd immunity. Show me the page and defintion of it. There is one for herd immunnity. There is one for vaccine. There is no deffintion of one what you use or throwing around saying herd immunity is taking place because of a vaccine or as you like to call it vaccine herd immunity.
You can't post things up and throw numbers around or cases to make some made up word fit your narrative.
I'll give you 5min to come back with a totally different case or twist some facts or call me daft.
I'm off, not got time for this bullshit.