What the hell is this COVID about?

What about the cure, putin applied to his daughter?? Any comrade here please inform us
 
CDC came out with report on new infections in July. 70% of newly infected wore masks ALWAYS, 15% nearly always. There has been exactly ONE RCT done on the ability of cloth masks to prevent the spread of a virus (flu). The CONTROL group got infected LESS than those that wore the cloth masks. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
Sweden didn't lock down, and now their deaths are nil. Spain locked down hard, and now they aren't looking so good. We can't keep the world on lockdown, and most masks don't help and may actually make things worse.
Ahh more factual information, and what a surprise, once you look at facts instead of people just regurgitating "stay at home", "wear a mask", what you find is that data-based reality might be a bit different to the messaging from the news.

Positive rate is the number of people that tested positive among those that were tested. It's independent of the number of actual tests.
Yeah but obviously the important metric isn't the rate so much as the total number, which is what he meant. The total number of positives goes up as more testing is done, and logically that statement is true.
 
On Facebook? Same "haha" and "wrr" reactions. Nobody agrees with the government's decisions. Everyone knows there is a virus, a maximum of a few % negate it. But almost 100% doesn't agree with actual restrictions.
Great example of bubble created by facebook and other similar social media.
 
Great example of bubble created by facebook and other similar social media.
A great example of normal people not wanting to lose their jobs, businesses, and sources of income for something that 99.9% of people under 60 don't die from.

The normal flu is statistically more dangerous to people under 60 actually.
 
Great example of bubble created by facebook and other similar social media.
So what you suggest? That those restrictions are the only way? I don’t think so. And that’s why people are reacting.
 
CDC came out with report on new infections in July. 70% of newly infected wore masks ALWAYS, 15% nearly always. There has been exactly ONE RCT done on the ability of cloth masks to prevent the spread of a virus (flu). The CONTROL group got infected LESS than those that wore the cloth masks. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

The control group wore medial masks. This study simply says that cloth masks are ineffective, medical masks should be used instead. It does not promote not wearing masks.
 
A great example of normal people not wanting to lose their jobs, businesses, and sources of income for something that 99.9% of people under 60 don't die from.

The normal flu is statistically more dangerous to people under 60 actually.

Where is this constant comparison to the flu all the time?

Flu yearly kills 500 000 people

Covid has killed more than 1 000 000 and this is WITH QUARANTINE AND EXTRA MEASURES.

That's the bubble I mentioned. People get their data only from media that feeds it to them (Facebook feed)
 
So what you suggest? That those restrictions are the only way? I don’t think so. And that’s why people are reacting.

Every country tries its own way. Sweden tried with easy measures and no quarantine and we all know where it leads them. After that, they changed tactics and it got better.

Its balance between lives and economy. On one hand shitty economy brings more suicide, and another hand, you get killed by covid.
I know it sucks but spreading false information can get more people killed
 
Where is this constant comparison to the flu all the time?

Flu yearly kills 500 000 people

Covid has killed more than 1 000 000 and this is WITH QUARANTINE AND EXTRA MEASURES.

That's the bubble I mentioned. People get their data only from media that feeds it to them (Facebook feed)
And you get the data from TV. That's the point.


Look. "Covid has killed more than 1 000 000"
I would better say "1,000,000+ people died WHILE they had covid19" and that changes the whole sense. Isn't it true?
 
And you get the data from TV. That's the point.
I don't watch TV, never said I do.
Internet is your best way to gather data and no I don't mean youtube "documentaries" or facebook posts.
Look. "Covid has killed more than 1 000 000"
I would better say "1,000,000+ people died WHILE they had covid19" and that changes the whole sense. Isn't it true?
Same thing you can say with flu. People who die WHILE they have flu.
Newsflash, this is how diseases usually work
 
Where is this constant comparison to the flu all the time?

Flu yearly kills 500 000 people

Covid has killed more than 1 000 000 and this is WITH QUARANTINE AND EXTRA MEASURES.

That's the bubble I mentioned. People get their data only from media that feeds it to them (Facebook feed)
CDC figures, 94% of COVID deaths had an average of 2.6 other potentially fatal conditions and caused of death when they died.

1,000,000 * 0.06 = 60,000

Internet is your best way to gather data and no I don't mean youtube "documentaries" or facebook posts.


https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm


Feel free at this point to say "Oh ok, I didn't know that but that's changed my perspective a bit, there's a chance that COVID is way less deadly than I thought it was and the common flu might actually be more deadly than COVID."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Positive rate is the number of people that tested positive among those that were tested. It's independent of the number of actual tests.

BUT positive numbers can only go up based on the number of people being tested... I don't get why that's hard to understand.

THERE are more people being tested now that there where back in March / April / May.

If you test more people. There are going to be more positives in them numbers.

Makes no difference how you try and spin it. If there is more testing there is going to be more positives. The accuracy behind those is another thing again..

Look at this way.

If no one got tested. There are no positives. So does that mean everyone immune? Or there is no virus?

Don't even get me started on the flaws of reporting when it comes to area number and case reported vs how many actual tests they can do in a day.
 
Last edited:
CDC figures, 94% of COVID deaths had an average of 2.6 other potentially fatal conditions and caused of death when they died.

1,000,000 * 0.06 = 60,000




https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm


Feel free at this point to say "Oh ok, I didn't know that but that's changed my perspective a bit, there's a chance that COVID is way less deadly than I thought it was and the common flu might actually be more deadly than COVID."
Read my post above.
THIS IS HOW DISEASES WORK
People rarely die with only one underlying disease.
Those who have good health and no health problems don't die and the immune system fights off most diseases.
 
Read my post above.
THIS IS HOW DISEASES WORK
People rarely die with only one underlying disease.
Those who have good health and no health problems don't die and the immune system fights off most diseases.

No @VSYNC point is I think.

If you die in a car crash tomorrow. You are included in the COVID death count. But did Covid kill you or the car crash?

There is no clear definition between them. However there is not when it comes to the death figure being reported.
 
No @VSYNC point is I think.

If you die in a car crash tomorrow. You are included in the COVID death count. But did Covid kill you or the car crash?

There is no clear definition between them at least not one that is being reported.
So you and @VSYNC are saying that all the doctors of the world are conspiring and reporting false deaths?
 
People are dying. Among main reasons is MEDICATION. That’s a top 3 factor. Someone quit on taking medication? No.

People are dying from flu and lungs issues every year. Is the world closed down because of that? No.

People are dying from vaccines, too. Are vaccines banned? Well, the companies behind take no legally responsability. Govt, approved death.

Keep throwing hate around because people are dying. It is a NORMAL survival of the fittest game. A natural event.
 
Back
Top