Good job I wasn't trying to prove anything then, eh? The burden of proof is on the person making the claim, i.e. you. The fact that these global updates reach places where people have no stake or interest in Donald Trump is a basic flaw in your logic, not something in support of a claim I'm making.
If you want to talk facts and numbers, feel free. The Guardian (biggest newspaper of the UK left) saw drops in this update; the Daily Mail (ditto of the UK right) saw about exactly the same. NBC went up while Fox went down, although Fox still have almost SEVEN times as many keywords in SERPs, so make of that what you will. The funniest, though, is that Donald Trump's own website saw YUGE gains in the update...
We could argue until the cows come home about this website or that website, but if Trump's very own website got a boost in the update, I doubt this was an update targeting Trump lmao. Unless these are false flag SERPs!!!
https://www.semrush.com/analytics/organic/positions/?db=us&searchType=domain&q=dailymail.co.uk
https://www.semrush.com/analytics/organic/positions/?db=us&searchType=domain&q=theguardian.com
https://www.semrush.com/analytics/organic/positions/?db=us&searchType=domain&q=foxnews.com
https://www.semrush.com/analytics/organic/positions/?db=us&searchType=domain&q=nbc.com
https://www.semrush.com/analytics/organic/positions/?db=us&searchType=domain&q=donaldjtrump.com
could you please attach a screenshot of the newspaper elpais.com, and point the algoritmic updates?
dont have semrush atm