Google releasing a large update today

People have had sites recover but are keeping quite about it. Why would people openly create more competition for themselves?

I am not saying that people should reveal their domains/websites. What's the point of having a thread about a core update if people refuse to share their experiences? All I would like is to be pointed in the right direction. Should I focus on links, content or page speed etc..
 
I wouldn't disavow ANY backlinks. How do you know which backlinks are good and which are bad in Googles eyes? Is it also said that links which are pure spam are ignored by Google, so they don't make you lose your rankings etc.

Another thing is that this update is pure bullshit. This thread is 60 pages long and no one knows what this update is about. Everyone tries to make changes to their websites but still they're not regaining their ranks. So what's the point? I'll not touch anything on my website as in my opinion its pointless. Either the ranks will get back to normal in the next few weeks or in the next G update. If not - then it's time to switch to another traffic sources as Google is making everything to make you buy adverts.

New, small websites are ranking high. Authority sites are mostly not being hit by the update. Sites that are between these two above got tanked.

I see your point and I have waited for two weeks for things to settle down, then a month to see if things improve and now, almost two months in and seeing that anyone can copy parts of my articles and easily outrank them, I have to assume that it's a penalty and not just a waiting game. That's why I think there has to be something about the links (about 80% are ******** - completely natural though).

I'll disavow some of my links, at this point I have nothing to lose, if I don't see an improvement I can always remove those links from the disavow file.
I'll do it in stages, disavow links from a couple of posts that have high exact anchor text. If I see an improvement I'll move on and disavow more links.
As I said, I have nothing to lose as at this point the ranking lost anyway.

I've read a few days ago on seroundtable that google doesn't put any time limit on links, if they go after links and anchor text, they go all the way back, NOT 2 or 3 years back. Although I have not bought any links in the past 3 years, there could some very old links that might be hurting my site/ranking.
I have good quality content, so there is not much I do with it. Maybe small adjustments here and there.

I look forward to see how things work out for your site. If nobody experiments, then there's no getting to the bottom of this issue.
 
I gotta ask, for all those deranked, do you lean left or right?

With everything going on, I'm at the point where Google knows what I like and dislike on Youtube and this could be an anti-Trump update.

"Not on our side, derank".
Same as "They are not on our team, get them fired".
The people on the inside are evil and insane. Remember this.
I honestly find this question relevant, might be something here. Though i know politics isnt allowed on bhw so dunno if were allowed to discuss this?
 
We dont lean anyway..........nothing to do with politics and have never mentioned a politician or any political views on our site. Dont watch any relevant videos either
 
just a question

By 100% whitehat, do you mean that the site doesn't contain sites like web 2.0s? like no Blogspot, typepad and strikingly sites?

and for those who are hit (I know almost all of you in this forum) how's your backlink profile? have you had those web 2.0s direct to your money site?

if not, does your main links have links to those sites as well (tier 2s or 3s)?

and for those with spammy backlinks, are the ones linking back to them are sites that don't have any backlinks at all?

How's your traffic? Is it till on the up side because I'm considering removing web 2.0 backlinks pointing to my site. I don't know if it's the right thing to do.
 
Some of my keywords are still jumping from page 1 to 5,6,7,8,9, and then back to 1 again. I still think we should be a little bit more patient.
 
I totally agree. At this point, no one really knows what is going on with google and the update. I've seen sites that have little to no backlinks rank high, authority sites like facebook/pinterest rank high, even spammy sites ranking high. It seems the main ones that got hit were the ones in between. More authority than a new site but less authority then the big companies. Every one in my entire niche got hit except for the tiny guy.

see the attached. The site, amateur dropshipping site, no blog, no content. Except for the product description.
DA is 6, 33 referring domains, and 999 backlinks. It ranks number 8 for my keywords.

My site DA55, dropped from page 1 to page 5.

I tweeted the site to John to ask if his team made a mistake. He said he is happy to see a new site appeared on the first page.

It pissed me off. This update is so fishy.
 

Attachments

  • da-1.jpg
    da-1.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 198
How's your traffic? Is it till on the up side because I'm considering removing web 2.0 backlinks pointing to my site. I don't know if it's the right thing to do.

Are web2.0 and profile page on github etc is bad for backlink?
 
Does submission to video, pdf, audio, ebook, infographic, etc to sites like these.

help or hurt my site?

Does it consider as a spam / low quality / bad link?

 
Holly molly. I just checked for a review and there are two Amazon links at the top followed by two pages of YouTube videos (TWO PAGES!) and then start the reviews of some poor losers that I was actually searching for. Oh Google, what the hell are you doing?
 
I searched for another review and the first page is like this: four Amazon links, two identical links to a review websites, two links to the manufacturer. What's with these multiple links from the same domain?
 
Holly molly. I just checked for a review and there are two Amazon links at the top followed by two pages of YouTube videos (TWO PAGES!) and then start the reviews of some poor losers that I was actually searching for. Oh Google, what the hell are you doing?
Yeah, tell me about it. Yesterday I searched for a bank profile in the US and found five Google Books pages on the top 10, and those pages were not in any way relevant to the search query I entered. It was in page 2 I saw what I was actually looking for. Google is so messed up right now. And that's one of the reasons I believe there's a higher chances of them reverting this update in the near future.
 
It's been nearly a month and a half now and these fuckers still haven't reversed it.
 
Back
Top