You will never be punished or penalized by Google for having social signals, that just doesn't exist
True, but you won't be rewarded for social signals either. It may work for other search engines, it won't fly with Google.
As I said earlier, you will absolutely be rewarded for Social signals in Google.
NOT in terms of SEO and ranking. Like I've said above social ranking depends on external data google has no control over, they did a test some time ago and abruptly for no apparent reason they were cut off, this is exactly why external data google has no control over doesn't matter in terms of ranking. Sure they will show you a tweeter feed if you google a name + tweeter handle name, if that's what you after go for it but in terms of a ranking factor, it's useless.
Social signs are human collaboration measurements on social stages like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Medium, and so on. A few instances of social signs are: likes, loathes, shares, votes, pins, sees, and so forth which usually help to exhibit notoriety and partiality for a particular bit of substance.
I don't, the thing you're not getting is that google will NEVER rely on an external data they have no control over as a major ranking factor, that's the big picture you're failing to see. Like I said before, they've been there, they've done that, they've been cut off at one point for no apparent reason, and it messed up their ranking. Sure it'll work if you google a name + Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Medium, and so on but if at any point google doesn't have access to that data your ranking is gone with the wind and replaced with what google thinks is right. Right now it does rank for some keywords but it's not a major ranking factor.You're failing to see the big picture. You have to learn to think outside of the box, especially dealing with Google and their mealy-mouthed bullshit.
Because of what social signals inherently do, which DO in fact contribute to ranking and are in fact ranking factors such as traffic engagement mentions all of which Google clearly states are part of the algorithm, they therefore do Boost ranking.
Case closed
Backlinks sure are an external factor which in a lot of cases are more easy to manipulate than social signals. Social signals are worth at least as much as nofollow links (which is considerable) up to a lot more depending on the specific case.I don't, the thing you're not getting is that google will NEVER rely on an external data they have no control over as a major ranking factor, that's the big picture you're failing to see. Like I said before, they've been there, they've done that, they've been cut off at one point for no apparent reason, and it messed up their ranking. Sure it'll work if you google a name + Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Medium, and so on but if at any point google doesn't have access to that data your ranking is gone with the wind and replaced with what google thinks is right. Right now it does rank for some keywords but it's not a major ranking factor.
I don't, the thing you're not getting is that google will NEVER rely on an external data they have no control over as a major ranking factor, that's the big picture you're failing to see. Like I said before, they've been there, they've done that, they've been cut off at one point for no apparent reason, and it messed up their ranking. Sure it'll work if you google a name + Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Medium, and so on but if at any point google doesn't have access to that data your ranking is gone with the wind and replaced with what google thinks is right. Right now it does rank for some keywords but it's not a major ranking factor.