SO IRRITATED!!!!

[DuckingOutstanding]

So, I've heard of this happening to other people, never quite THIS quickly though....

Yesterday (I spent a good chunk of time writing and editing, by hand, an exceptionally long (a little over 3k word) blog post to give a blog of mine a solid boost. Took care, it was MS content to ensure that it was edited and formated well, citations were perfect, proper amount of media assets , and optimized properly, without going overboard, anchor text was ideal - it was something to be proud of.

I happened to be checking on another article I ordered from a vendor, was gonna run it through copyscape, ran my own through copyscape first as a "control" because I know I wrote that by hand yesterday so it's (obvioulsy) original content...

Well when it went thorugh copyscape's "siteliner" which checks external sites - guess what?

Some spammy piece of $&!@ scraped parasite piece of shit site had already managed to scrape it, spin it JUST enough to completely ruin it's readability - GET IT INDEXED ALREADY and it's showing up as the "Original" and MINE is showing up as Duplicate (apparently their spinner was enough to destroy the experience but not make it different enough to not be able tell it was my article, that they managed to steal from my site and get indexed literally within 12hours of it being posted!)

I'm So FUCKING MAD RIGHT NOW


BTW if you're one of those lazy POS parasite Motherfuckers who aren't even talented enough to have their own method - your method involved buying some stupid bot with mommy and daddy's money and entering a command every now and then - FUUUUCCCCCKKKK YYOUUUUU you have no business on the internet you RETARDED MILLENNIAL PARASITE


# Uncharactaristic Rant Complete

 

[blackwalker]

I just checked this one though, so you should be good

 

[DuckingOutstanding]

I just checked this one though, so you should be good

You've officially made me crack a smile lol Thank you for htat

 

[theeyeinside]

How about the next time you do this -

Set the date of publication to 3 days ago

Publish

Take the url of the article and manually submit it to google so it gets time stamped in their system

Submit the url on one of those sites that submit to 500 engines

Submit the url to Archive.org so maybe they capture it

Might that create a "paper trail" so that google will recognize your ownership?

Sincerely,

TheEye

 

[DuckingOutstanding]

How about the next time you do this -

Set the date of publication to 3 days ago

Publish

Take the url of the article and manually submit it to google so it gets time stamped in their system

Submit the url on one of those sites that submit to 500 engines

Submit the url to Archive.org so maybe they capture it

Might that create a "paper trail" so that google will recognize your ownership?

Sincerely,

TheEye

Didn't Google do away with manually submitting URL to crawl a couple months ago? Also, I've never heard of setting of publish date earlier than now LOL enlighten me on that

 

[christianbed]

Didn't Google do away with manually submitting URL to crawl a couple months ago? Also, I've never heard of setting of publish date earlier than now LOL enlighten me on that

Yes, they dropped it and so did Bing. I don't know about the publish date either, but my guess is that he thinks Google will see it as canonical since it has an earlier date on the publishing platform. However, if the other guy is getting indexed faster, I don't know that it matters. You can try posting it immediately to social networks...also, if you can see the time the other guy posted his, it probably will let you know when he's typically awake. So add or subtract 12hrs from that time and schedule your next post for then to see if that works.

 

[Trolling4Dollars]

Yes, they dropped it and so did Bing.