Is the messenger Dust safe?

[rayblack]

What will you choose? Adamant or Dust? You can't trust both messengers.

Adamant as I and some people around already use it.
And I trust more its secured communication than Dust.

 

[Dialgon]

Adamant as I and some people around already use it.
And I trust more its secured communication than Dust.

Do you know many adamant users? I don't know one.

 

[rayblack]

Do you know many adamant users? I don't know one.

I have few people who I have conversations with using this messenger.

 

[Dialgon]

I have few people who I have conversations with using this messenger.

Are you trying to attract new users?

 

[rayblack]

Are you trying to attract new users?

Nope, I don't need that.
I have those important people who use it and that's okay.
You may not use this messenger.

 

[Dialgon]

Nope, I don't need that.
I have those important people who use it and that's okay.
You may not use this messenger.

I want to use a secure messenger and keep my personal information confidential. We decided that this is only one messenger. I don't know his users. I can't communicate with myself. I can't show such a terrible user interface to my colleagues.

 

[dibridor]

Which one does also?

did you hear anything about the signal?

 

[Dialgon]

did you hear anything about the signal?

No. What do you know about it? Is it safe?

 

[Prensty]

If you use encrypted chats in Telegram or even WhatsApp, you can be sure of privacy.
Or you think it's all scam?

You're wrong, man.. The point is that Telegram agreed to pass information about users to 3rd parties if needed. And as for secret chats - there's a simple algorithm to hack it.
One guy did it easily, he reported to Telegram about that issue but they are so busy to put some attention to it.

 

[Dialgon]

You're wrong, man.. The point is that Telegram agreed to pass information about users to 3rd parties if needed. And as for secret chats - there's a simple algorithm to hack it.
One guy did it easily, he reported to Telegram about that issue but they are so busy to put some attention to it.

Is it true? What information about us can pass on to third parties? Are you sure?

 

[macdonjo3]

Isn't that the one Mark Cuban talks about?

 

[Dialgon]

Isn't that the one Mark Cuban talks about?

I think about it Mark Cuban talks.

 

[Prensty]

Is it true? What information about us can pass on to third parties? Are you sure?

You can find the official proof on the web. They can pass your correspondence and ip addresses. They say it will only concern criminals, but I tink that in order to find them they check our messages. So it's not trusty anymore.

 

[rayblack]

You're wrong, man.. The point is that Telegram agreed to pass information about users to 3rd parties if needed. And as for secret chats - there's a simple algorithm to hack it.
One guy did it easily, he reported to Telegram about that issue but they are so busy to put some attention to it.

You talking about Durov?

 

[Prensty]

You talking about Durov?

Durov is a developer of Telegram and as I know he announced the reward to anyone who will find any bugs in the service.
But as time shows he doesn't really check all the cases that are reported as the service becomes only worse.

 

[BobLender]

.
No. I hear such information for the first time. Can you give more details about it?

if you google about dust security, you will find more info from the trustworthy sources about data not protected from developers.

 

[Dialgon]

You can find the official proof on the web. They can pass your correspondence and ip addresses. They say it will only concern criminals, but I tink that in order to find them they check our messages. So it's not trusty anymore.

It looks like they are rummaging through our dirty laundry.

 

[Dialgon]

Durov is a developer of Telegram and as I know he announced the reward to anyone who will find any bugs in the service.
But as time shows he doesn't really check all the cases that are reported as the service becomes only worse.

Can he transmit data consciously? Or he can't correct the mistakes. We don't know for sure.

 

[Prensty]

Can he transmit data consciously? Or he can't correct the mistakes. We don't know for sure.

It seems like he's too busy for that as still there are very many users of Telegram. Just a few people will refuse it and install some other more protected messengers.
Moreover not all the people believe in this news..

 

[Dialgon]

It seems like he's too busy for that as still there are very many users of Telegram. Just a few people will refuse it and install some other more protected messengers.
Moreover not all the people believe in this news..

Should we trust this too? This information can be reported by competitors and intruders, right?