YT Bot Operation Review

wydos21

BANNED
Oct 21, 2018
75
27
For about two months I have been with the bot.

It has gained organic growth, but it takes quite a bit of money each month to implement it.

Also, it takes a lot of time to find a proxy, and proxies don't last long.

Server costs are also quite expensive.

Since I am not with AdSense, there are no restrictions on the content.

It's not bad for me, but it's hard to maintain and it's hard to find a working proxy, so I'm stopping now.

I think there will be a better way other than this one.

After making a reservation for Premier, we first released the video and checked several channels that increased viewership. I'm currently trying to find their way.

Conclusion: There are bots that work, but their operations are costly and not as fast as the investment cost.
 
at the end bots will always get detected, youtube/google are always improving their anti-spam tools, they can invest unlimited resources in that direction, so the best is to re-think this and try to do things more naturally, since they also changed the algorithm in a way that will prevent ranking from automated views
 
at the end bots will always get detected, youtube/google are always improving their anti-spam tools, they can invest unlimited resources in that direction, so the best is to re-think this and try to do things more naturally, since they also changed the algorithm in a way that will prevent ranking from automated views

Yes. The bot is detected.
However, what I learned from this test is that the bot is still valid and more effective than BHW's SMM.
If I could still have a proxy that satisfies the conditions, I would have commercialized this. But it is impossible.
 
For about two months I have been with the bot.

It has gained organic growth, but it takes quite a bit of money each month to implement it.

Also, it takes a lot of time to find a proxy, and proxies don't last long.

Server costs are also quite expensive.

Since I am not with AdSense, there are no restrictions on the content.

It's not bad for me, but it's hard to maintain and it's hard to find a working proxy, so I'm stopping now.

I think there will be a better way other than this one.

After making a reservation for Premier, we first released the video and checked several channels that increased viewership. I'm currently trying to find their way.

Conclusion: There are bots that work, but their operations are costly and not as fast as the investment cost.

Yes. OP you are correct. Ther are bots that work but in order to get things you need proper investment and that will do the job. :)



Thanks,
AD
 
For about two months I have been with the bot.

It has gained organic growth, but it takes quite a bit of money each month to implement it.

Also, it takes a lot of time to find a proxy, and proxies don't last long.

Server costs are also quite expensive.

Since I am not with AdSense, there are no restrictions on the content.

It's not bad for me, but it's hard to maintain and it's hard to find a working proxy, so I'm stopping now.

I think there will be a better way other than this one.

After making a reservation for Premier, we first released the video and checked several channels that increased viewership. I'm currently trying to find their way.

Conclusion: There are bots that work, but their operations are costly and not as fast as the investment cost.
lol that all depends on how ur bot is coded and how effective it is.
i have my own bot, been farming 4M to 7M views per month per channel.

my investment cost and maintenance cost is cheap.

if you get a public bot and have no proper investment money, then u will get poor results.

i also use livestream bot, but we also have a video suggestion bot being developed and our first test helped out video get sugggested and we will start using this bot by october when our dev completes making it.
but again our investment is not big like u make it sound, if u use public method its always going to be hard. ever since i started my own bot method i dont use any smm panel anymore.

for an expense of 100 to 200 usd per month for vps, proxies and other bills/things, i make 1.5k to 2k usd, back per channel lol.


they key point here is, it is private method. ive got several friends who know what i do and they offered me cash to bot them.

i rejected all of it. i just realized, selling or renting views is not worth it, rather ill do it myself.


any public method = short lived and quick patch.


ill rather keep it private
 
I luckily found a vendor that provides a clean proxy.
And according to other partners, the bot works even if it's not a residential proxy. I've found a supplier that provides a very cheap clean proxy, so I'll try again.
 
For about two months I have been with the bot.

It has gained organic growth, but it takes quite a bit of money each month to implement it.

Also, it takes a lot of time to find a proxy, and proxies don't last long.

Server costs are also quite expensive.

Since I am not with AdSense, there are no restrictions on the content.

It's not bad for me, but it's hard to maintain and it's hard to find a working proxy, so I'm stopping now.

I think there will be a better way other than this one.

After making a reservation for Premier, we first released the video and checked several channels that increased viewership. I'm currently trying to find their way.

Conclusion: There are bots that work, but their operations are costly and not as fast as the investment cost.
Yeahh, hard to maintain is the thing.
 
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features and essential functions on BlackHatWorld and other forums. These functions are unrelated to ads, such as internal links and images. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock