Your Web 2.0s: You Blasting BS or Manually Putting up Unique Content?

uncguy4321

Regular Member

Jul 10, 2011

339

120

• Apr 16, 2015

• #1

I guess I need some motivation, or confirmation this is the best way. I use software to create my 2.0 accounts and then I go in to about half of them and manually create profiles, themes, etc to make it look real and personal. I use unique content on these and use them as a big part of my tier 1 link layer.

Then I see other sites on those web 2.0s where its obvious the people just automated the hell out of everything, spun BS with links...and obviously its still there, else I wouldnt see it.

Am I doing it right? Im doing this for a few authority sites that im in for the long haul with.

Should I be carefully crafting 15-20 web 2.0s or blasting the hell out of 120 of them and hope some stick?

So...your opinions? What do YOU do for your long term moneysites?

 

S

senzu

Regular Member

Nov 18, 2014

216

75

• Apr 16, 2015

• #2

I do all of mine manually. Create email, Web 2 account, etc. I also write unique articles for them. All of them have lasted for at least 6 months. Throw in some other links for diversity and low comp keywords aren't a problem.

 

uncguy4321

Regular Member

Jul 10, 2011

339

120

• Apr 16, 2015
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #3

senzu, ive got a new domain...site and domain are only about 1.5 months old, 2 at the most. would that hurt me you think? even for low comp keywords

 

lilmasta

Elite Member

May 21, 2009

2,865

1,346

• Apr 16, 2015

• #4

for long term i would say stick to what you are doing now, if you wanna blast them then create another layer of parasites (web2.0, articles, free press release, doc/pdf submission) targeting the 1st layer which you made with unique content and blast the 2nd layers using exact match and naked url anchors. you can also try dripapps penny ranking method its basically about creating 301 tinyurl redirects, to be safe i would suggest to target 2nd layer of parasites.

 

asap1

BANNED

Mar 25, 2013

4,956

3,262

• Apr 16, 2015

• #5

Stick with high quality web 2.0s, yes the low quality will work but will they last the test of time? Maybe not

 

jonwatson

Senior Member

Dec 17, 2012

1,188

178

• Apr 16, 2015

• #6

i am suggest you to create high quality web 2.0 with manually

 

thebat1980

Senior Member

Nov 19, 2013

836

198

• Apr 16, 2015

• #7

Again another Manual creator - if you find it easier to talk more fluidly then a voice to text program is pretty cool I use Dragon NaturallySpeaking on my Mac - just through complete boredom![h=3][/h]

 

uncguy4321

Regular Member

Jul 10, 2011

339

120

• Apr 16, 2015
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #8

Thank you guys for your input...it truly helps.

 

supervitallica

Junior Member

Mar 14, 2014

176

100

• Apr 16, 2015

• #9

I was asking myself this question too. I implemented it for a new blog (low competition 3000 searches/month).I don't have results right now. But this is what i do/will do:
tier 1) Create 5 high quality web2.0 profiles with no backlinks. post content like spinned articles, videos and pictures on it (scheduled)
tier 2) Outsource web 2.0 creation. point these links to my tier 1 web 2.0 blogs.
tier 3) spam the hell out of tier 2 with all kinds of links (LQ)

after tis is done i will check my tier 1 for rankings and place a link or two to my moneysite.
Hope this is all clear

 

7thAmigo

Supreme Member

Dec 4, 2011

1,387

75

• Apr 16, 2015

• #10

I've been using spun readable content for my own sites and client sites and they get the job done. Though I would recommend unique content...not everyone can afford it.

 

Kralj187

Senior Member

Jul 9, 2012

1,098

244

• Apr 16, 2015

• #11

Creating tier 1 Web 2.0 manually, but with wordai readable spun content. Some Web 2.0 are over 2 years old and not once was one deleted (have 200+)...

 

S

seapunk

Registered Member

Dec 28, 2014

85

20

• Apr 17, 2015

• #12

Hand writing text nobody is going to read is a waste of time.

And linking techniques like the one you're describing won't work "for the long haul", so you really have no fucking clue about what you're doing.

 

asap1

BANNED

Mar 25, 2013

4,956

3,262

• Apr 17, 2015

• #13

seapunk said:

Hand writing text nobody is going to read is a waste of time.

And linking techniques like the one you're describing won't work "for the long haul", so you really have no fucking clue about what you're doing.

Click to expand...

Damn your just spreading all kinds of bullshit, this is the second time I seen you post some crap.

YES, no one will read your web 2.0s but what happens if google rolls out a update that can recognize this spun crap? Google will slap your ass to N/A while im sitting pretty at #1

 

S

seapunk

Registered Member

Dec 28, 2014

85

20

• Apr 17, 2015

• #14

asap1 said:

Damn your just spreading all kinds of bullshit, this is the second time I seen you post some crap.

YES, no one will read your web 2.0s but what happens if google rolls out a update that can recognize this spun crap? Google will slap your ass to N/A while im sitting pretty at #1

Click to expand...

What if Google rolls out an update that can recognize the 200,000 forum profile links behind your American-college-student-written non-crap?

It's happened before.

And I'm not even talking about manual reviews yet...

 

uncguy4321

Regular Member

Jul 10, 2011

339

120

• Apr 17, 2015
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #15

Weewoo, genius alert. We help each other here. Anything constructive to add?

seapunk said:

Hand writing text nobody is going to read is a waste of time.

And linking techniques like the one you're describing won't work "for the long haul", so you really have no fucking clue about what you're doing.

Click to expand...

 

Last edited: Apr 17, 2015