Any sophisticated operation is way more complicated than WordPress.Bruh, so much hate on wordpress.
bruh, you are talking about Symfony and laravel, so you suppose we are talking about users who already know codes.Any sophisticated operation is way more complicated than WordPress.
WordPress is complicated when it comes to being extensible.
This is what their whole CMS is about.
The core of it is super simple.
Now these extensions they provide aren't very fancy and the best you'll find is woocommerce or theme that lets you use Gutenberg blocks.
It's just a no-code tool for bloggers. It's hell for developers as every plugin / extension is written differently. It's really hard to optimize something like that. I don't want it.
I'd rather use something that is for the purpose of my venture out of the box.
When you use WordPress and want to customize it, you quickly realize you need to pay monthly fees for everything that is more custom than default. And it sucks. There's plenty of bugs with free alternative plugins. It's a mess if you don't have cash or build more complicated websites.
Symfony and laravel are better alternatives. Just don't install too many extensions cause again, they're usually free for basic options but anything more custom is paid...
Anything I write suddenly becomes 5 classes and 30 functions. I have rich ideas. I mean, big ideas. WordPress is ok for people who work in teams like any CMS. I don't work in a team. So without a team, I can just parse markdown files and display them on screen. I can also do LaTeX to show what I mean.Since you already know codes, what's the hassle for writing your own PHP snippets in Wordpress?
makes sense.Anything I write suddenly becomes 5 classes and 30 functions. I have rich ideas. I mean, big ideas. WordPress is ok for people who work in teams like any CMS. I don't work in a team.
Get rid of flexibility if you want consistency which is pure godliness and a sign of humbleness. Look at Apple. They abbreviate things and have so much money. People who use WordPress think extensibility is a good thing. Well, the same people work in 50 different niches. That's not gonna be good.With wordpress, there would be more flexibility in redesign.
It has opinions about how you do things. For example, the buttons and the modals, container size etc. Tailwind on the other hand has less of these opinions. It gives you colors palettes and utility classes to make the button and modal by yourself. It's like buying the ingridients of mac and cheese and making it yourself, instead of buying mac and cheese from your shop nearby.What is opinionated? The phrase is meaningless to me.
Why not make a cms of your own? Should be pretty simple to use something like ghost or something similar? I mean, you need a way to efficiently manage the data somehow, specially if you are doing a project for a client or a company. If its your own indie project, be wild lol.I can't use CMS. It will never give me the power of pure assembly. I don't want CMS.
For me tailwind is simpler. It all comes down to what you are used to. There is no right or wrong way of doing things. With starter projects like vite, tree shaking (the act of purging unused css) is done automatically. You just have to setup tailwind as per documentation.Bootstrap is better for landing pages. It's easier to make use of and it's easier to install individual classes.
Tailwind is complicated to setup in other projects. You need to filter classes, so you're not using useless stuff and creating big .css files.
I don't know.
Most of the good tailwind libraries are free anyway. Example, shadcn UI is absolutely awesome, and it is free and opensource.And yeah, you need to be careful to not blow your money on some tailwind library. There's plenty of people pushing tailwind ui libraries for money.
Haha, this is why you use a framework, coz it manages all for you... like next.js, nuxt and more.I mean the problems start to occur when you use cms / framework backending, react, tailwind, some tooling, all at once. God damn it, you only need one thing. I had all four and complained why my work is so time consuming. I wanted to do 6 projects in different hard, technical niches. Was I challenging myself.
Very true! So, don't be scared lol.Was I doing mistakes... But who doesn't make mistakes doesn't pave the road to success.
As a classic engineer I would say bootstrap is tightly coupled, while the library you recommended is loosely coupled beyond one coupling with tailwind but that's not too much as tailwind isn't tightly coupled and makes more sense for developers than bootstrap.It has opinions about how you do things. For example, the buttons and the modals, container size etc. Tailwind on the other hand has less of these opinions. It gives you colors palettes and utility classes to make the button and modal by yourself. It's like buying the ingridients of mac and cheese and making it yourself, instead of buying mac and cheese from your shop nearby.
Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. The setup of it is crazy. And it's the most painful step in it. I was setting it up with laravel + react back then which is a complete disaster. I abandoned those projects as it was just over-engineered and ideas themselves were too short term.For me tailwind is simpler. It all comes down to what you are used to. There is no right or wrong way of doing things. With starter projects like vite, tree shaking (the act of purging unused css) is done automatically. You just have to setup tailwind as per documentation.
the choice between Bootstrap and WordPress depends on your specific needs and goals. Bootstrap is ideal for front-end development and creating visually appealing websites, while WordPress excels in content management and offers a wide range of plugins and themes.Hello everyone.
I’m going to make a site with just articles and pictures. I’m thinking to use bootstrap because it load faster than Wordpress and probably my site will be ranking better. Am I right ?
@Alexandr1997 If your concern is only about posting articles and ranking then Wordpress would be convenient for you because you can edit things on your own if you don't have coming knowledge and if have then gone for that mainly for tailwind CSS bootstrap is quite an old approach.Hello everyone.
I’m going to make a site with just articles and pictures. I’m thinking to use bootstrap because it load faster than Wordpress and probably my site will be ranking better. Am I right ?
Isn't Google themselves saying that page speed, especially mobile, will influence ranking and even quality score of Adwords?You are wrong.
Loading fast won't make your site rank better.
they want you to do free work to make your site load fast so google's real customer(the searchers) are happy.Isn't Google themselves saying that page speed, especially mobile, will influence ranking and even quality score of Adwords?
They seemed very ambigious about it for years, but from a quick search their most recent statement from this year in their documentation goes as follows, stating Core Web Vitals is being used by their ranking systems:they want you to do free work to make your site load fast so google's real customer(the searchers) are happy.
Who doesn't like a fast site?
But it is just a trick that google want your free labor. Too many examples that crazy-low-speed sites rank as high as the sky.
afaik, google recently removed page speed or core web vitals from the ranking guideline, if i remember correctly.