wiki backlinks are too dangerious for main website

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 17472
  • Start date Start date
D

Deleted member 17472

Guest
Never used too many wiki backlinks to your main website

Always used wiki backlinks for tier 1, 2 and tier 3 backlinks.

Wiki backlinks are saturated very quickly.

If you ever purchased any wiki backlink service from BHW or from fiverr or any other website, then you can see that after 10-12 days, only 10-20% backlinks or less active and rest all are dead or edited by any other persons or deleted by wiki sites.

So take little precaution while building wiki backlinks.
 
i can understand what you are saying, but i have not had the same experience....

when i use wiki's i use thousands or urls and thousands or keywords so maybe this helps spread the affect...
 
No they aren't dangerous...
Use good quality articles... 80% unique and human readable.
Drip feed your links.
Use a lot of anchors... including some generic keywords, LSI keywords and even naked URLs.
 
Never used too many wiki backlinks to your main website

Always used wiki backlinks for tier 1, 2 and tier 3 backlinks.

Wiki backlinks are saturated very quickly.

If you ever purchased any wiki backlink service from BHW or from fiverr or any other website, then you can see that after 10-12 days, only 10-20% backlinks or less active and rest all are dead or edited by any other persons or deleted by wiki sites.

So take little precaution while building wiki backlinks.

Just like any backlinks going to moneysite, we have to take it with a grain of salt. Is the content placed on your wiki posts unique? LSI rich? Are your anchor texts diversified? What's the pagerank/authority like for the wiki site?

If you have links coming from an authoritative wiki site with good content, I don't see why you wouldn't want it going to your moneysite.
 
datpiff mixtape downloads 100 for 5buckz, 5k for 25 buckz, 10k for 35 buckz, 25k for 150 buck
 
How much do you diversify your anchor text?
If I'm creating 100 articles should I do 30% diversification in the anchor text?
 
LoL, I can vouch for that.

One time, I blasted a main site with 6000+ unique wiki links (all successful ones).
Now to think of it, that was a really dumb move as I was already ranking first page for several keywords.
At first all was normal after the blast... then a few days later, it disappeared.

I was banging my head against the wall for the next few days.
 
No they aren't dangerous...
Use good quality articles... 80% unique and human readable.
Drip feed your links.
Use a lot of anchors... including some generic keywords, LSI keywords and even naked URLs.

I don't know who is teaching this guy but he is spot on.
 
Back
Top