Yeah, I agree with you raidar.
If someone was banned because they try to push a rule like advertising in a sig, or they have an argumentative personality and push it too far with a mod, that doesn't necessarily mean they aren't trustworthy. In fact it kind of shows that they're up front about themselves, even if it may be a little too much up front. A good scammer would do everything possible to gain peoples trust so he could conduct his scam easier.
Someone that got banned might be a expert, and very successfull at what they do, even if they blow it with a mod over a tos issue, or they're in a bad mood and start baiting and arguing with the mods or other members. They might be a jerk, they might be really annoying, but even an annoying jerk can be great at helping make a project work.
A lot of people in this business tend to be slightly antisocial and a little tempermental by nature anyway, it takes a little of that just to be able to devote the computer time required to learn everything.
I think this was probably the reasoning behind why the banned users subforum in the shitlist was created originally. Unfortunately it's never been used with enough consistency to be effective.
It would be helpful if when people were banned there was at least a minimal amount of info posted about it, either a public message on their public profile or a listing in the shitlist>banned users forum. Just a simple statement giving the basic info.
- Type of Ban -
A-Temporary or B-Permanent Ban, and if reason A what's the duration?
- Reason for Ban -
A-Scam or Fraud, B-Spammer, C-Violation of TOS. section X.x, D-Antisocial behavior, E-Clueless Noob needing a lesson, etc.
Maybe even temporary bans for C, D or E, only posted on the members public profile, and permanent Bans posted there and in the Shitlist>Banned Users.
I've suggested in other threads that it could be a good idea for the C, D or E violators to be put into a SHUN level first, with no posting priveledges before getting a ban. (and only able to PM with Mods)
This type of basic info could help people in raidar's position, where he's considering doing work with someone. He doesn't just WANT to know what happened with a member, he NEEDS to know in order to make a decision. Someone with a C or D violation, we might be glad to have them off the forum for a bit because they're annoying, but it doesn't mean they aren't trustworthy for doing some business with.
It could also put a stop to the speculation people make about why there was a ban, and people that don't know what really went on trying to put forth support for a banned member. In fact a lot of times that's the reason for a Ban. Even if misguided, a little bit of loyalty like that shows some good character if your considering a JV with someone.
Creating the Banned Member forum shows that the admins and mods have put some thought into the matter, but since it hasn't really been used much shows that a simple workable method for them to use it hasn't been developed yet. Issues like this one can be complex for a variety of reasons, so it might never have a complete solution.