Why SEnuke sucks...

Gary Becks said:

I personally prefer magic submitter. Does everything Senuke does and more as of today. Plus I can add/fix sites whenever they go down.

Click to expand...

I tried magic submitter and it never worked for me. Tried it on 2 different computers, it just failed everything basically. From around 12 hours trying it, only got 1 live link posted. I was not happy at all and was very frustrated using it. I don't think its as user friendly as SENuke.

accelerator_dd said:

It's the greed of not paying more and better programmers that would be only assigned at finding and fixing errors. It's not the .net language, i use it and my software does what it's supposed to do.

And knowing how little you should change for most errors it's pathetic. Seriously? Changing a simple regex takes 2-5 days? Few HttpWebRequests error checks not working?

I honestly can't see ANY reason why this guy is shitting where he eats. If i had software that was making me that much money I'd be sure to pay as much as needed to make it work properly (which I can bet is not even close to half of what he's making)

Click to expand...

For the record .Net is not a language but a framework and in my humble opinion it does indeed suck. But that's just me some people live and die by it.

Can't say for sure where the info about what they have to fix as far as regexes or http related stuff is coming from but I do know that when your working with an enormous project like Senuke debugging can be very tedious at best especially when working in Visual Studio, you often go in to fix one thing and then realize that in fixing it something else has stopped working properly. It's not half as easy as one might imagine.

Kickflip said:

I tried magic submitter and it never worked for me. Tried it on 2 different computers, it just failed everything basically. From around 12 hours trying it, only got 1 live link posted. I was not happy at all and was very frustrated using it. I don't think its as user friendly as SENuke.

Click to expand...

Different strokes for different folks. It was hell at first but seems to be working pretty well as of today.

I agree, it surely isn't as user friendly as Nuke though.

still works fine in my computers ...

Frankly unless you are selling a link building service based on SENuke OR manage a ton if link building campaigns then SENuke simply isn't worth the price tag.

.....there are a ton of similarly priced tools and services offered on BHW that offer way more bang for your buck....

Heck, whenever I need web 2.0 or other similar types of links I'll turn to BHW. They services are cheap, based in how I'd use SENuke personally, and don't require me to fiddle endlessly setting up and monitoring campaigns and results.

With the 147/mo. price tag I can get myself several decent blasts each month for my sites.

To each there own though

sick submitter and amr do the same thing senuke does..