Why Pay For AI Content?

Why do people pay for AI content?
All they do... take a few sources, spin the content and spew it out. So why pay when you can use free spinners to do exactly that?
Simply copy the bits you like then spin the article for free... now you have an AI-generated content for FREE.

Needless to say that good plagiarism checkers will pick it up. But it will pass copyscape as 100% plagiarism free.
I know of some writing services which do exactly that and sell it as original copyscape-passed content.

Can the free version of Quillbot create content as good as Jarvis?

I have thought of that too bro. That is why the statement What Sell most is not the best product but well marketed.

I just bought an AI tool days ago, i have not started using it, maybe this will be my last.

I didn t come accross a free ai tool with unlimited characters.

same here luls a lot of the sellers here provide AI content that is spun

As a content creator, I mostly use "AI" content generators when I need to quickly spit 5-10 ideas for a sentence, for example. I find them an ok product if you want to ease yourself when creating unique content. It is easier to structure sentences with the help of such content generators.

If i'm using an ai writer its searches for the content, and gets hopefully as relevant as it can contain. This saves me the time of doing that. I don't have to search websites for content.

I can also expect a Copyscape passed article, with at least the barebones to expand the article to something good with a few research checking, and expansions of text. Ok, this part doesn't change much in terms of time.

Written >> AI content >> spun >> copied

Are you saying these services exist on BHW who pass spin content as readable hand written content , if yes did you report them?. Pm the mods with proof as it’ll help all

medi123 said:

I didn t come accross a free ai tool with unlimited characters.

Click to expand...

for free? no
but there are relatively cheap AI generators (below $50/mth) with unlimited usage

It takes time to generate readable AI content that makes sense. If you need to fact-check - it takes even more time. Editing - more time.
If you don't want to do it yourself, you need to hire someone else to do it for you.

GPT-3 based tools aren't cheap tbh
Most spinners spew out garbage that hardly makes sense

HustleTong said:

GPT-3 based tools aren't cheap tbh
Most spinners spew out garbage that hardly makes sense

Click to expand...

Is copy.ai or rytr.me expensive at $30 per month while 10m characters is not even the limit?

real AI content is not just copied and spinned. it uses other text as source yes, but that is used to train the neural network how a language works.
it will then be able to generate similar text about a certain topic. training an AI is not that easy and takes a lot of resources and time to get good output.
take a simpler form as an example - the markov algorithm. its been used since ages to generate text.
it is not really readable, but works to create unique content that search engines will index (most people who use it cloak the site though).
anyways so what this algorithm does is calculate how often a word occures next to anotherone to find similarities.
it then creates so called markov chains of words with a propability that they fit together. it then goes word by word to create a sentence.
it is kind of a primitive AI without neural network, but it learns too in a simpler form. the more text you pass as "base" text, the more it can analyze and create.
so you see this is different to just copy and spin text. however of course that also works, i'm just saying that you can't compare it with AI content as that is generated and not just copied and not spinned at all (unless someone adds that on top).

getseoonline said:

same here luls a lot of the sellers here provide AI content that is spun

Click to expand...

If that's the case, report the BST mate.

As to the original question, there are different types of Ai content other than GTP-3. Some are much better than others.

You can get away with gibberish on buffer sites, but not for money sites.

reaaski said:

Is copy.ai or rytr.me expensive at $30 per month while 10m characters is not even the limit?

Click to expand...

Rytr doesn't satisfy me tbh
It's a great tool for filler content but Jarvis is a different animal

HustleTong said:

Rytr doesn't satisfy me tbh
It's a great tool for filler content but Jarvis is a different animal

Click to expand...

I didn't think Jarvis could generate higher quality content. However, when I look at different tools they produce entirely different outputs. They have different settings for GPT-3, so that would explain it.

Funny you have no idea how AI content works. Spun is basically paraphrasing word by word. AI can take a whole paragraph and create another paragraph within context. Now that's a totally different animal.

praetserge said:

Why do people pay for AI content?

Click to expand...

People will always pay for something that's cheap and can generate money.
In the past it was spun content, sometimes these content pieces didn't even make sense but still there was a market with demand.
AI content is just the next level of spun content can be used for variety of purposes like link building, autoblogging, ad copy (PPC), email marketing etc...........
And with a little help of a skilled human VA it can be optimized and converted into a decent quality blog post.

praetserge said:

Needless to say that good plagiarism checkers will pick it up. But it will pass copyscape as 100% plagiarism free.

Click to expand...

Google doesn't care so it doesn't matter if any plagiarism checker pics it up or not.
With my personal experience 75% or more on copyscape indexes and also ranks if optimized.
Now for ranking there are other ranking factors too but in general and low to medium competitive niches this type of content ranks often and indexes always.
I was doing multi level G translate for many years to generate blogs and affiliate sites.
I am still doing it and Google still doesn't care.

praetserge said:

All they do... take a few sources, spin the content and spew it out. So why pay when you can use free spinners to do exactly that?

Click to expand...

Nope it's not just spinning it's more than that and that's why quality is better & it's filler quality can be used on moneysite.
I used to use non native writers for filler quality content in past now AI generates bulk quantity of same content and it cheaper.
Nearly an year and half ago I had 12 in house writers now I have 4 skilled VA's doing the same thing with AI less expense more output.

I know time will come when this will die but until then game on.

MKSKS said:

People will always pay for something that's cheap and can generate money.
In the past it was spun content, sometimes these content pieces didn't even make sense but still there was a market with demand.
AI content is just the next level of spun content can be used for variety of purposes like link building, autoblogging, ad copy (PPC), email marketing etc...........
And with a little help of a skilled human VA it can be optimized and converted into a decent quality blog post.

Google doesn't care so it doesn't matter if any plagiarism checker pics it up or not.
With my personal experience 75% or more on copyscape indexes and also ranks if optimized.
Now for ranking there are other ranking factors too but in general and low to medium competitive niches this type of content ranks often and indexes always.
I was doing multi level G translate for many years to generate blogs and affiliate sites.
I am still doing it and Google still doesn't care.

Nope it's not just spinning it's more than that and that's why quality is better & it's filler quality can be used on moneysite.
I used to use non native writers for filler quality content in past now AI generates bulk quantity of same content and it cheaper.
Nearly an year and half ago I had 12 in house writers now I have 4 skilled VA's doing the same thing with AI less expense more output.

I know time will come when this will die but until then game on.

Click to expand...

Thanks a lot for the great answer.