Why is ZennoPoster better than uBot?
- Thread starter -FPC-
- Start date
So much bull in this thread now yes ubot is good but not that good
luminus
me (posted reply on page 4)
Backing it up bug posted by me
25 January 2012 on the ubot forum
25 February 2012
Its now 4th march
Just shows don't believe all you read do your own research and look for facts
luminus
luminus
me (posted reply on page 4)
Backing it up bug posted by me
25 January 2012 on the ubot forum
Code:
http://ubotstudio.com/forum/index.php?/topic/9199-runtime-error-message/page__p__46962#entry46962
Code:
http://ubotstudio.com/forum/index.php?/topic/9589-40100-r6025-error-revisited/Its now 4th march
Just shows don't believe all you read do your own research and look for facts
Gary Becks
Power Member
- Apr 11, 2010
- 679
- 285
To be completely fair both tools are great in their own right - but as of right now I prefer Ubot . My problems with both of the tools have been with the devs and the way they treat customers concerning certain situations.
All and all I feel Ubot is more versatile now that lots of the bugs have been fixed and Zenno is more stable , especially when it comes to not crashing on you.
All and all I feel Ubot is more versatile now that lots of the bugs have been fixed and Zenno is more stable , especially when it comes to not crashing on you.
Hey. I only can post message here Luminus. I have not reach criteria of 15 post.
May I know the different between Ubot and senukeX and zenoposter? I know Now senukeX the success rate has drop than before.
Ubot 4 I realise Only the professional version have catcha recognize. What is success rate solve catcha?
Looking forward for your reply.
Thank you
May I know the different between Ubot and senukeX and zenoposter? I know Now senukeX the success rate has drop than before.
Ubot 4 I realise Only the professional version have catcha recognize. What is success rate solve catcha?
Looking forward for your reply.
Thank you
luminus
Junior Member
- Oct 21, 2008
- 112
- 33
Hey zap - If you had thousands of customers using thousands of web pages, how would you prioritize bug fixes? Multiple people spent a lot of time trying to reproduce the bug that you mentioned, and we were honest about not being able to reproduce it. We didn't ignore it. Just couldn't fix what we couldn't see. We mentioned that we were finally able to find it and reproduce it on the 29th of February, but a fix is not yet in place because of the complexity. I understand your criticism, but bugs that "appear randomly" and only happen "to some people" are extremely hard to nail down and solve, and in those few instances, you're right, we don't fix them immediately. That would be impossible. But we absolutely fix what is effecting most users and we do so very fast. That's our main goal.
luminus
Junior Member
- Oct 21, 2008
- 112
- 33
Hey rmaxsg,
We do not have "captcha recognition" in UBot at the moment. We use integrated captcha services like Decaptcher etc, and the success rate of those is fairly high - but obviously comes at a price.
I'll PM you with more information, as I did before, so as not to be criticized for posting in the thread. If anyone else wants to chime in here they should.
We do not have "captcha recognition" in UBot at the moment. We use integrated captcha services like Decaptcher etc, and the success rate of those is fairly high - but obviously comes at a price.
I'll PM you with more information, as I did before, so as not to be criticized for posting in the thread. If anyone else wants to chime in here they should.
Seth
Bottom line in my eyes is your software is good but the reliably lets it.
Hell the last few update killed my software I can no longer run a compiled threaded bot more then about 150 loops before it shuts down.
And yes I?m very angry about all the time I have put into ubot so much so I canceled my subscription to ubot and I?m left with nothing, So your intentions maybe good but the end result for me is not good, I see fit to criticizes your software in the same way that I have praised it when its has worked well, But I cannot work with the reliably of this standard
I told you this on your forum (fix all the bugs before adding now functions) make the software rock soiled reliable
No at first I was told it was not ubot as there are no pure function calls made by ubot weeks passed before it was said it could be a library file.
So more advanced users making more complex bots have to sit and wait?
Bottom line in my eyes is your software is good but the reliably lets it.
Hell the last few update killed my software I can no longer run a compiled threaded bot more then about 150 loops before it shuts down.
And yes I?m very angry about all the time I have put into ubot so much so I canceled my subscription to ubot and I?m left with nothing, So your intentions maybe good but the end result for me is not good, I see fit to criticizes your software in the same way that I have praised it when its has worked well, But I cannot work with the reliably of this standard
redchillies
Junior Member
- Feb 1, 2013
- 184
- 22
ZennoPoster is a good software, but the learning curve imho is much higher than that of something like Ubot. Ubot is solid, but it too has a steep learning curb and can be difficult to navigate for the noob but nowhere as much as Zenno poster. Zennoposter has alot more potential to address certain problems and glitches that Ubot does not, but it is so hard to learn the software for many people.